UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12a
Main Street Capital Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set
forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
Main Street Capital Corporation
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800
Houston, Texas 77056
_______ __, 2009
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend this years Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Main Street
Capital Corporation, which will be held on June 11, 2009, at 1330 Post Oak Boulevard, First Floor
Auditorium, Houston, Texas, commencing at 9:00 AM, local time. The notice of annual meeting and
proxy statement following this letter describe the matters to be acted on at the meeting.
If your shares are held in book-entry form on the records of American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, our transfer agent and registrar, we have enclosed a proxy card for your use. You may vote
these shares by completing and returning the proxy card or, alternatively, calling a toll-free
telephone number or using the Internet as described on the proxy card. If a broker or other nominee
holds your shares in street name, your broker has enclosed a voting instruction form, which you
should use to vote those shares. The voting instruction form indicates whether you have the option
to vote those shares by telephone or by using the Internet.
Thank you for your support of our company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely yours,
VINCENT D. FOSTER
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please take a few minutes now to vote your shares.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to Be Held on June 11, 2009.
Our proxy statement and annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 are
available on the Internet at http://mainstcapital.com under the Proxy and Annual Report section
of our web site.
The following information applicable to the Annual Meeting may be found in the proxy statement
and accompanying proxy card:
|
|
|
The date, time and location of the meeting; |
|
|
|
|
A list of the matters intended to be acted on and our recommendations regarding those
matters; |
|
|
|
|
Any control/identification numbers that you need to access your proxy card; and |
|
|
|
|
Information about attending the meeting and voting in person. |
Main Street Capital Corporation
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800
Houston, Texas 77056
Notice of 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The 2009 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of Main Street Capital Corporation, a Maryland
corporation, will be held at 1330 Post Oak Boulevard, First Floor Auditorium, Houston, Texas, on
Thursday, June 11, 2009, at 9:00 AM local time, in order to:
|
(1) |
|
elect our directors for a term of one year; |
|
|
(2) |
|
approve a proposal to authorize us, with the approval of our Board of Directors, to
sell shares of our common stock during the next twelve months at a price below our then
current net asset value per share; |
|
|
(3) |
|
ratify our appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009; and |
|
|
(4) |
|
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment
thereof. |
If you were a stockholder as of the close of business on April 15, 2009, you are entitled to
vote at the meeting and at any adjournment thereof.
Please indicate your vote as to the matters to be acted on at the meeting by following the
instructions provided in the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form, whether or not you
plan on attending the meeting. If you plan to attend the meeting and wish to vote or change your
vote there, please review the instructions set forth in the accompanying proxy statement under the
caption Voting Information.
We have enclosed a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, with this notice and proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors,
JASON B. BEAUVAIS
Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: _______ __, 2009
PROXY STATEMENT FOR 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
i
Main Street Capital Corporation
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800
Houston, Texas 77056
PROXY STATEMENT
2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
GENERAL INFORMATION
We are mailing this proxy statement and accompanying proxy card to our stockholders beginning
on ___, 2009. Our Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at our
2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) to be held on June 11, 2009 at 1330 Post
Oak Boulevard, First Floor Auditorium, Houston, Texas, at 9:00 AM local time. We will bear all
expenses incurred in connection with this proxy solicitation, which we expect to conduct primarily
by mail. We have engaged Laurel Hill Advisory Group LLC to assist in the solicitation for a fee
that will not exceed $6,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, our officers and regular
employees may solicit your proxy by telephone, by facsimile transmission or in person, for which
they will not be separately compensated. If your shares are held through a broker or other nominee
(i.e., in street name), we have requested that your broker or nominee forward this proxy
statement to you and obtain your voting instructions, for which we will reimburse them for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
VOTING INFORMATION
Record Date and Who May Vote
Our Board of Directors selected April 15, 2009 as the record date (the Record Date) for
determining stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. This means that if you were a
registered stockholder with our transfer agent and registrar, American Stock Transfer and Trust
Company, on the Record Date, you may vote your shares on the matters to be considered by our
stockholders at the Annual Meeting. If your shares were held in street name on that date, the
broker or other nominee that was the record holder of your shares has the authority to vote them at
the Annual Meeting. They have forwarded to you this proxy statement seeking your instructions on
how you want your shares voted.
On
the Record Date, ___ shares of our common stock were outstanding. Each outstanding
share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote on each matter to be acted on at the Annual
Meeting.
How to Vote
For shares held of record, you can vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting or vote
now by giving us your proxy. You may give us your proxy by completing the enclosed proxy card and
returning it in the enclosed U.S. postage-prepaid envelope, or by calling a toll-free telephone
number or using the Internet as further described in the enclosed proxy card. In either case,
telephone and Internet voting procedures have been designed to verify your identity through a
personal identification or control number and to confirm that your voting instructions have been
properly recorded. If you vote using either of these electronic means, you will save us return mail
expense.
By giving us your proxy, you will be directing us on how to vote your shares at the Annual
Meeting. Even if you plan on attending the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote now by giving us
your proxy. This will ensure that your vote is represented at the Annual Meeting. If you do attend
the Annual Meeting, you can change your vote at that time, if you then desire to do so.
If your shares are held in street name, the broker or nominee that holds your shares has the
authority to vote them, absent your approval, only as to routine matters, such as the election of
our directors and the ratification of our appointment of our independent registered public
accounting firm. For all other matters, the broker or nominee that holds your shares will need to
obtain your authorization to vote those shares and has enclosed a voting instruction
1
form with this proxy statement. In either case, they will vote your shares as you direct on
their voting instruction form. You can vote by completing the enclosed voting instruction form and
returning it in the enclosed U.S. postage-prepaid envelope. If you want to vote your shares in
person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker or nominee. You should
refer to the instructions provided in the enclosed voting instruction form for further information.
Additionally, the availability of telephone or Internet voting depends on the voting process used
by the broker or nominee that holds your shares.
You may receive more than one proxy statement and proxy card or voting instruction form if
your shares are held through more than one account (e.g., through different brokers or nominees).
Each proxy card or voting instruction form only covers those shares of common stock held in the
applicable account. If you hold shares in more than one account, you will have to provide voting
instructions as to all your accounts to vote all your shares.
How to Revoke or Change Your Vote
For shares held of record, you may revoke a proxy or change your vote at any time before it is
exercised by written notice to our Corporate Secretary, granting a new proxy or by voting in person
at the Annual Meeting. Unless you attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person, you
should change your vote using the same method (by telephone, Internet or mail) that you first used
to vote your shares. That way, the inspectors of election for the meeting will be able to verify
your latest vote.
For shares held in street name, you should follow the instructions in the voting instruction
form provided by your broker or nominee to change your vote. If you want to change your vote as to
shares held in street name by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy
from the broker or nominee that holds those shares for you.
Quorum
The Annual Meeting will be held only if a quorum exists. The presence at the Annual Meeting,
in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the
Record Date will constitute a quorum. If you attend the meeting or vote your shares using the
enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form (including any telephone or Internet voting
procedures provided), your shares will be counted toward a quorum, even if you abstain from voting
on a particular matter. Shares held by brokers and other nominees as to which they have not
received voting instructions from the beneficial owners and lack the discretionary authority to
vote on a particular matter are called broker non-votes and will count for quorum purposes.
Proposals to Be Voted on; Vote Required; and How Votes Are Counted
We are asking you to vote on the following:
|
|
|
the election of all the members of our Board of Directors; |
|
|
|
|
the proposal to authorize us, with approval of our Board of Directors, to sell shares
of our common stock during the next twelve months at a price below our then current net
asset value per share; and |
|
|
|
|
the ratification of our appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. |
Election of Directors. The affirmative vote, in person or by proxy, of a plurality of all the
votes cast at the Annual Meeting is sufficient to elect a director. Each share may be voted for
each of the six director nominees. Abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on
this item.
Approval to Authorize the Sale of Common Stock, with Approval of our Board of Directors,
During the Next Twelve Months at a Price Below Net Asset Value Per Share. Under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act, the affirmative vote of (1) the holders of a majority of the
shares of stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting; and (2) the holders of a
majority of the shares of stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting that are not
held by affiliated persons of our company (as such term is defined in the 1940 Act) is
2
required to approve this proposal. For purposes of this proposal, the 1940 Act defines a
majority of the outstanding shares as: (A) 67% or more of the voting securities of a company
present at a meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such
company are present or represented by proxy; or (B) 50% of the outstanding voting securities of
such company, whichever is less. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of votes
against this proposal.
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, is required to ratify the
appointment of Grant Thornton LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Abstentions will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will not
have any effect on the result of the vote.
We are not aware of any other matters that may be presented or acted on at the Annual Meeting.
If you vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or using the telephone or Internet
voting procedures, the individuals named as proxies on the card may vote your shares, in their
discretion, on any other matter requiring a stockholder vote that comes before the Annual Meeting.
Confidential Voting
All voted proxies and ballots will be handled to protect your voting privacy as a stockholder.
Your vote will not be disclosed except:
|
|
|
to meet any legal requirements; |
|
|
|
|
in limited circumstances such as a proxy contest in opposition to our Board of
Directors; |
|
|
|
|
to permit independent inspectors of election to tabulate and certify your vote; or |
|
|
|
|
to adequately respond to your written comments on your proxy card. |
3
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(ITEM 1)
Pursuant to our articles of incorporation, each member of our Board of Directors serves a
one-year term, until the annual meeting of stockholders and until his respective successor is duly
qualified and elected. Currently, our Board of Directors has six members.
The term of office of all directors will expire at this years Annual Meeting. On the
nomination of our Board of Directors, Messrs. Michael Appling Jr., Joseph E. Canon, Arthur L.
French, William D. Gutermuth, Vincent D. Foster and Todd A. Reppert will stand for reelection as
directors at the Annual Meeting for a term of one year.
Unless otherwise directed, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card intend to
vote FOR the election of the nominees. If any nominee should become unavailable for election, the
shares will be voted for such substitute nominee as may be proposed by our Board of Directors.
However, we are not aware of any circumstances that would prevent any of the nominees from serving.
Set forth below is certain information (ages are as of April 30, 2009) with respect to the
nominees for election as directors. Certain of our directors who are also our officers may serve as
directors of, or on the boards of, certain of our portfolio companies. The business address of each
nominee listed below is 1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.
Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Name and Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
|
Since |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Appling, Jr. |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Mr. Appling is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of TNT Crane & Rigging Inc.,
a privately held full service crane and
rigging operator. From July 2002 through
August 2007, he was the Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of
XServ, Inc., a large private equity-funded,
international industrial services and rental
company. Mr. Appling has also held the
position of CEO and President for United
Scaffolding, Inc., an XServ, Inc. operating
subsidiary. In February 2007, XServ, Inc. was
sold to The Brock Group, a private industrial
services company headquartered in Texas. From
March 2000 to June 2002, Mr. Appling served as
the Chief Financial Officer of CheMatch.com,
an online commodities trading forum,
ChemConnect, Inc., a venture-backed
independent trading exchange, acquired
CheMatch.com in January 2002. From June 1999
to March 2000, Mr. Appling was Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of American Eco
Corporation, a publicly traded, international
fabrication, construction and maintenance
provider to the energy, pulp and paper and
power industries. Mr. Appling worked for ITEQ,
Inc., a publicly traded, international
fabrication and services company, from
September 1997 to May 1999, first as a
Director of Corporate Development and then as
Vice President, Finance and Accounting. From
July 1991 to September 1997, Mr. Appling
worked at Arthur Andersen LLP, where he
practiced as a certified public accountant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph E. Canon |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Since 1982, Mr. Canon has been the Executive
Vice President and Executive Director, and a
member of the Board of Directors, of Dodge
Jones Foundation, a private charitable
foundation located in Abilene, Texas. Prior to
1982, Mr. Canon was an Executive Vice
President of the First National Bank of
Abilene. From 1974 to 1982, he was the Vice
President and Trust Officer with the First
National Bank of Abilene. Mr. Canon currently
serves on the Board of Directors of First
Financial Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ-GM:FFIN), a
financial holding company headquartered in
Abilene, Texas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Name and Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
|
Since |
|
Mr. Canon also serves on the
Board of Directors for several bank and
trust/asset management subsidiaries of First
Financial Bankshares, Inc. He has also served
on the Board of Directors of various other
organizations including the Abilene Convention
and Visitors Bureau, Abilene Chamber of
Commerce, Conference of Southwest Foundations,
City of Abilene Tax Increment District, West
Central Texas Municipal Water District and the
John G. and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial
Foundation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur L. French |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
From September 2003 through March 2007, Mr.
French was a member of the Advisory Board of
Main Street Capital Partners, LLC and a
limited partner of Main Street Mezzanine Fund,
LP (both of which are now subsidiaries of Main
Street). Mr. French began his private
investment activities in January 2000; he has
served as a director of FabTech Industries, a
steel fabricator, since November 2000, and as
a director of Rawson, Inc., a distributor of
industrial instrumentation products, since May
2003. Mr. French served as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Metals USA Inc. from
1996-1999, where he managed the process of
founders acquisition, assembled the management
team and took the company through a successful
IPO in July 1997. From 1989-1996, he served as
Executive Vice President and Director of
Keystone International, Inc. After serving as
a helicopter pilot in the United States Army,
Captain-Corps of Engineers from 1963-1966, Mr.
French began his career as a Sales Engineer
for Fisher Controls International, Inc., in
1966. During his 23-year career at Fisher
Controls, from 1966-1989, Mr. French held
various titles, and ended his career at Fisher
Controls as President and Chief Operating
Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William D. Gutermuth |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Since 1986, Mr. Gutermuth has been a partner
in the law firm of Bracewell & Giuliani LLP,
specializing in the practice of corporate and
securities law. From 1999 until 2005, Mr.
Gutermuth was the Chair of Bracewell &
Giulianis Corporate and Securities Section.
Mr. Gutermuth is a published author and
frequent lecturer on topics relating to
corporate governance and enterprise risk
management. He has been recognized by
independent evaluation organizations as One
of the Best Lawyers in America-Corporate M&A
and Securities Law and as a Texas Super
Lawyer. In addition, Mr. Gutermuth serves as
a director of the Texas TriCities Chapter of
the National Association of Corporate
Directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interested Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Foster and Reppert are interested
persons, as defined in the 1940 Act, due to
their positions as officers of Main Street. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Vincent D. Foster is the Chairman of our Board
of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer
as well as a member of our investment
committee. Since 2002, Mr. Foster has been a
senior managing director of Main Street
Mezzanine Management, LLC and Main Street
Capital Partners, LLC (both of which are now
subsidiaries of Main Street). He has also been
the senior managing director of the general
partner for Main Street Capital II, LP, a
small business investment company he
co-founded, since January 2006. From 2000 to
2002, Mr. Foster was the senior managing
director of the predecessor entity of Main
Street Mezzanine Fund. Prior to that, Mr.
Foster co-founded Main Street Merchant
Partners, a merchant-banking firm. He has
served as director of U.S. Concrete, Inc.
(NASDAQ-GM: RMIX) since 1999. He also serves
as a director of Quanta Services, Inc.
(NYSE:PWR), an electrical and telecommunications
contracting company, Carriage Services, Inc.
(NYSE: CSV), a death-care company, and Team,
Inc. (NASDAQ-GS: TISI), a provider of
specialty industrial services. In addition,
Mr. Foster serves as a director, officer and
founder of the Texas TriCities Chapter of the
National Association of Corporate Directors.
Prior to his private investment activities,
Mr. Foster was a partner of Andersen Worldwide
and Arthur Andersen LLP from 1988-1997. Mr.
Foster was the director of Andersens
Corporate Finance and Mergers and Acquisitions
practice for the Southwest United States and
specialized in working with companies involved
in consolidating industries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Name and Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
|
Since |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Todd A. Reppert is our President and Chief
Financial Officer and is a member of our
investment committee. Since 2002, he has been
a senior managing director of Main Street
Mezzanine Management, LLC and Main Street
Capital Partners, LLC (both of which are now
subsidiaries of Main Street). Mr. Reppert has
been a senior managing director of the general
partner for Main Street Capital II, LP, a
small business investment company he
co-founded, since January 2006. From 2000 to
2002, Mr. Reppert was a senior managing
director of the predecessor entity of Main
Street Mezzanine Fund. Prior to that, he was a
principal of Sterling City Capital, LLC, a
private investment group focused on small to
middle-market companies. Prior to joining
Sterling City Capital in 1997, Mr. Reppert was
with Arthur Andersen LLP. At Arthur Andersen
LLP, he assisted in several industry
consolidation initiatives, as well as numerous
corporate finance and merger/acquisition
initiatives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The affirmative vote, in person or by proxy, of a plurality of all the votes cast at the
Annual Meeting is sufficient to elect a director. Each share may be voted for each of the six
director nominees. Abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this item.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES
NAMED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
6
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We maintain a corporate governance section on our Web site which contains copies of the
charters for the committees of our Board of Directors. The corporate governance section may be
found at http://mainstcapital.com under Governance in the Investor Relations section of our Web
site. The corporate governance section contains the following documents, which are available in
print to any stockholder who requests a copy in writing to Main Street Capital Corporation,
Corporate Secretarys Office, 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056:
Audit Committee Charter
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter
Compensation Committee Charter
In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may be found at http://mainstcapital.com
under Governance in the Investor Relations section of our Web site and is available in print to
any stockholder who requests a copy in writing.
Director Independence
Our Board of Directors consists of six members, four of whom are classified under applicable
listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market as independent directors and under Section 2(a)(19)
of the 1940 Act as not interested persons. Based on these independence standards, our Board of
Directors has affirmatively determined that the following directors are independent:
Michael Appling Jr.
Joseph E. Canon
Arthur L. French
William D. Gutermuth
Our Board of Directors considered the following relationships in evaluating our directors
independence under the applicable listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Both Messrs. Canon
and French had previously been limited partners in Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP, and Mr. French
had previously served on the Advisory Board of Main Street Capital Partners, LLC, one of our wholly
owned subsidiaries and the investment advisor to Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP. Our Board of
Directors determined that those prior relationships would not impact the ability of either Mr.
Canon or Mr. French to exercise independent judgment and do not impair the independence of either
of them.
Communications with the Board
Stockholders or other interested persons may send written communications to the members of our
Board of Directors, addressed to Board of Directors, c/o Main Street Capital Corporation, Corporate
Secretarys Office, 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056. All communications
received in this manner will be delivered to one or more members of our Board of Directors.
Lead Director
Our Board of Directors approved the designation of Arthur L. French as lead director to
preside at all executive sessions of non-management directors. In the lead directors absence, the
remaining non-management directors may appoint a presiding director by majority vote. The
non-management directors meet in executive session without management on a regular basis.
Stockholders or other interested persons may send written communications to Arthur L. French,
addressed to Lead Director, c/o Main Street Capital Corporation, Corporate Secretarys Office, 1300
Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.
7
Board of Directors and its Committees
Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors met six times and acted by unanimous written
consent eight times during 2008. All directors attended 100% of the meetings of the Board of
Directors and of the committees on which they served during 2008. We require each director to make
a diligent effort to attend all Board and committee meetings, as well as each Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Committees. Our Board of Directors currently has, and appoints the members of, standing Audit,
Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Each of those committees is
comprised entirely of independent directors and has a written charter approved by our Board of
Directors. The current members of the committees are identified in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board Committees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Corporate |
Director |
|
Audit |
|
Compensation |
|
Governance |
Michael Appling Jr.
|
|
Chair
|
|
|
|
þ |
Joseph E. Canon
|
|
þ
|
|
þ
|
|
Chair |
Arthur L. French
|
|
þ
|
|
Chair |
|
|
William D. Gutermuth
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
þ |
Audit Committee. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Audit Committee met five times
and acted by unanimous written consent once. The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting,
engaging and discharging our independent accountants, reviewing the plans, scope and results of the
audit engagement with our independent accountants, approving professional services provided by our
independent accountants (as well as the compensation for those services), reviewing the
independence of our independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of our internal control over
financial reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for assisting our Board of
Directors, in connection with its review and approval of the determination of the fair value of our
debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded or for which current market values are not
readily available. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Appling is an Audit Committee
financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and an independent
director. Messrs. Canon and French are the other members of the Audit Committee. For more
information on the backgrounds of these directors, see their biographical information under
Election of Directors above.
Compensation Committee. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Compensation Committee
met five times and acted by unanimous written consent once. The Compensation Committee determines
the compensation for our executive officers and the amount of salary, bonus and stock-based
compensation to be included in the compensation package for each of our executive officers. The
actions of the Compensation Committee are generally reviewed and ratified by the entire Board of
Directors, excluding the employee directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs.
Canon, French and Gutermuth.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met five times. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee is responsible for determining criteria for service on our Board of Directors,
identifying, researching and recommending to the Board of Directors director nominees for election
by our stockholders, selecting nominees to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors or a committee
of the Board, developing and recommending to our Board of Directors any amendments to our corporate
governance principles and overseeing the self-evaluation of our Board of Directors and its
committees and evaluations of our management. The members of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee are Messrs. Appling, Canon and Gutermuth.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent for purposes of the applicable
listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. No member of the Compensation Committee (1) was,
during the year ended December 31, 2008, or had previously been, an officer or employee of Main
Street or any of its subsidiaries or (2) had any material interest in a transaction of Main Street
or any of its subsidiaries or a business relationship with, or any
8
indebtedness to, Main Street or any of its subsidiaries. No interlocking relationship existed
during the year ended December 31, 2008 between any member of the Board of Directors or the
Compensation Committee and an executive officer of Main Street.
Director Nomination Process
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has determined that a candidate for election
to our Board of Directors must satisfy our general criteria. Each candidate must:
|
|
|
be an individual of the highest character and integrity and have an inquiring mind,
vision, a willingness to ask hard questions and the ability to work well with others; |
|
|
|
|
be free of any conflict of interest that would violate any applicable law or regulation
or interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director; |
|
|
|
|
be willing and able to devote sufficient time to the affairs of our company and be
diligent in fulfilling the responsibilities of a member of our Board of Directors and a
member of any committee thereof (including: developing and maintaining sufficient knowledge
of our company and the specialty finance industry in general; reviewing and analyzing
reports and other information important to responsibilities of the Board of Directors and
any committee of our Board of Directors; preparing for, attending and participating in
meetings of our Board of Directors and meetings of any committee of our Board of Directors;
and satisfying appropriate orientation and continuing education guidelines); and |
|
|
|
|
have the capacity and desire to represent the balanced, best interests of our
stockholders as a whole and not primarily a special interest group or constituency. |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to identify potential director
candidates who will strengthen the Board of Directors and will contribute to the overall mix of
specific criteria identified above. This process includes establishing procedures for soliciting
and reviewing potential nominees from directors and for advising those who suggest nominees of the
outcome of such review. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to
retain and terminate any search firm used to identify director candidates.
Any stockholder may nominate one or more persons for election as one of our directors at an
annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the notice, information and consent
provisions contained in our by-laws and any other applicable law, rule or regulation regarding
director nominations. When submitting a nomination to our company for consideration, a stockholder
must provide certain information that would be required under applicable SEC rules, including the
following minimum information for each director nominee: full name, age and address; class, series
and number of any shares of our stock beneficially owned by the nominee, if any; the date such
shares were acquired and the investment intent of such acquisition; whether such stockholder
believes the nominee is an interested person of our company, as defined in 1940 Act; and all
other information required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in
an election contest or is otherwise required, including the nominees written consent to being
named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected. See
Stockholders Proposals in this proxy statement and our by-laws for other requirements of
stockholder proposals.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates identified through
the processes described above, and will evaluate each of them, including incumbents, based on the
same criteria. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also takes into account the
contributions of incumbent directors as Board members and the benefits to us arising from their
experience on our Board of Directors. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
will consider candidates identified by stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee may determine not to recommend those candidates to our Board of Directors, and our Board
of Directors may determine not to nominate any candidates recommended by the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee. None of the director nominees named in this proxy statement was
nominated by stockholders.
9
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth the compensation that we paid during the year ended December
31, 2008 to our directors. Directors who are also employees of Main Street or of its subsidiaries
do not receive compensation for their services as directors.
Director Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or |
|
Stock Awards |
|
All Other |
|
|
Name |
|
Paid in Cash |
|
($)(1)(2) |
|
Compensation ($)(3) |
|
Total |
Michael Appling Jr. |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
$ |
86,838 |
|
Joseph E. Canon |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
81,838 |
|
Arthur L. French |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
81,838 |
|
William D. Gutermuth |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
76,838 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts represent the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with
respect to the 2008 fiscal year for the fair value of awards granted in 2008 as well as prior fiscal
years, if any, as determined in accordance with FAS 123R. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown
exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Please see
the discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of these awards in Note M to the audited
consolidated financial statements included in the annual report accompanying this proxy statement.
These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual
value that will be recognized by our directors.
|
|
(2) |
|
Each of our non-employee directors received an award of 5,000 restricted shares under the Main
Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted
Stock Plan on July 1, 2008. 2,500 restricted shares of each grant vested 100% immediately on the grant date for service on the Board
over the past year, and 2,500 restricted shares of each grant will vest 100% on June 10, 2009,
provided that the grantee has been in continuous service as a member of the Board of Directors
through such date. The grant date fair value of each non-employee directors award of restricted
stock granted in 2008 was $60,000 based on the $12.00 closing price of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market on July 1, 2008. Each non-employee director had 2,500 unvested shares
of restricted stock outstanding as of December 31, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
These amounts reflect the dollar value of dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards in 2008. |
The compensation for non-employee directors for 2008 was comprised of cash compensation paid
to or earned by directors in connection with their service as a director. That cash compensation
consisted of an annual retainer of $30,000. Non-employee directors will not receive fees based on
meetings attended absent circumstances that require an exceptionally high number of meetings within
an annual period. We also reimburse our non-employee directors for all reasonable expenses incurred
in connection with their service on our Board. The chairs of our Board committees receive
additional annual retainers as follows:
|
|
|
the chair of the Audit Committee: $10,000; and |
|
|
|
|
the chair of each of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance
committees: $5,000. |
Our 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan provides a means through which we may
attract and retain qualified non-employee directors to enter into and remain in service on our
Board of Directors. Under our 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, at the beginning
of each one-year term of service on our Board of Directors, each non-employee director will receive
a number of shares equivalent to $30,000 worth of shares based on the market value at the close of
the exchange on the date of grant. Forfeiture provisions will lapse as to an entire award at the
end of the one-year term.
10
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our executive officers serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors. The following
persons serve as our executive officers in the following capacities (ages are as of April 30,
2009):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position(s) Held |
Vincent D. Foster
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Todd A. Reppert
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Director, President and Chief Financial Officer |
Rodger A. Stout
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer, Senior Vice President
Finance and Administration and Treasurer |
Jason B. Beauvais
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Michael S. Galvan
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
Curtis L. Hartman
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Senior Vice President |
Dwayne L. Hyzak
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Senior Vice President |
David L. Magdol
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Senior Vice President |
For more information on Mr. Foster, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr.
Reppert, Director, President and Chief Financial Officer, see their biographical information under
Election of Directors above.
Rodger A. Stout serves as our Chief Compliance Officer, Senior Vice PresidentFinance and
Administration and Treasurer. Mr. Stout has been the chief financial officer of Main Street
Mezzanine Management, LLC, Main Street Capital Partners, LLC and the general partner of Main Street
Capital II, LP since 2006. From 2000 to 2006, Mr. Stout was senior vice president and chief
financial officer for FabTech Industries, Inc., a consolidation of nine steel fabricators. From
1985 to 2000, he was a senior financial executive for Jerold B. Katz Interests. He held numerous
positions over his 15-year tenure with this national scope financial services conglomerate. Those
positions included director, executive vice president, senior financial officer and investment
officer. Prior to 1985, Mr. Stout was an international tax executive in the oil and gas service
industry.
Jason B. Beauvais serves as our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to
joining us in June 2008, Mr. Beauvais was an attorney with Occidental Petroleum Corporation, an
international oil and gas exploration and production company, since August 2006. From October 2002
to August 2006, he was an associate in the Corporate and Securities section of Baker Botts L.L.P.,
where he primarily counseled companies in public issuances and private placements of debt and
equity and handled a wide range of general corporate and securities matters as well as mergers and
acquisitions. Mr. Beauvais has been licensed to practice law in Texas since 2002.
Michael S. Galvan serves as our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining
us in February 2008, Mr. Galvan was senior manager of financial operations with Direct Energy, a
retail gas and electricity service provider since October 2006. From September 2005 to October
2006, he was a senior audit manager with Malone & Bailey, PC, where he managed and coordinated
audits of publicly traded companies and other companies. From March 2003 to September 2005, Mr.
Galvan was Director of Bankruptcy Coordination at Enron Corporation. Prior to March 2003, he served
in other executive positions at various Enron affiliates.
Curtis L. Hartman serves as one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Mr. Hartman has been a managing
director of Main Street Mezzanine Management, LLC and Main Street Capital Partners, LLC since 2002
and a managing director of the general partner for Main Street Capital II, LP since January 2006.
From 2000 to 2002, he was a director of the predecessor entity of Main Street Mezzanine Fund. From
1999 to 2000, Mr. Hartman was an investment adviser for Sterling City Capital, LLC. Concurrently
with joining Sterling City Capital, he joined United Glass Corporation, a Sterling City Capital
portfolio company, as director of corporate development. Prior to joining Sterling City Capital,
Mr. Hartman was a manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, in its M&A/Transaction Services group.
Prior to that, he was employed as a senior auditor by Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Dwayne L. Hyzak serves as one of our Senior Vice Presidents and is a member of our investment
committee. Mr. Hyzak has been a managing director of Main Street Mezzanine Management LLC and Main
Street Capital Partners, LLC since 2002. He has also been a managing director of the general
partner for Main Street Capital II, LP since January 2006. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Hyzak was a
director of integration with Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE:
11
PWR), an electrical and telecommunications contracting company, where he was principally
focused on the companys mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance activities. Prior to
joining Quanta Services, Inc., he was a manager with Arthur Andersen LLP in its Transaction
Advisory Services group.
David L. Magdol serves as one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Mr. Magdol has been a managing
director of Main Street Mezzanine Management, LLC and Main Street Capital Partners, LLC since 2002
and a managing director of the general partner for Main Street Capital II, LP since January 2006.
From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Magdol was a vice president in the Investment Banking Group of Lazard Freres
& Co. LLC. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Magdol served as a vice president of McMullen Group, a private
equity investment firm capitalized by Dr. John J. McMullen. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Magdol worked in
the Structured Finance Services Group of Chemical Bank as a management associate.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, provides information relating to
the 2008 compensation of Main Streets Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial
Officer and four other most highly compensated executive officers during 2008. Those six
individuals are referred to in this CD&A as the Named Executive Officers, or NEOs.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The Main Street compensation system was developed by the Compensation Committee and approved
by all Independent Directors. The system is designed to attract and retain key executives, motivate
them to achieve the companys short-term and long-term objectives, reward them for superior
performance and align their interests with those of the companys stockholders. Significant
elements of the compensation arrangements with the NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer)
are set forth in separate employment agreements Main Street entered into with them in connection
with the companys initial public offering. Main Streets Chief Executive Officer, who has signed a
non-compete agreement, serves at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The structure of those
employment agreements and Main Streets incentive compensation programs are designed to encourage
and reward the following, among other things:
|
|
|
superior risk-adjusted returns on the companys investment portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
management team development; |
|
|
|
|
maintenance of liquidity and capital flexibility to accomplish the companys
business objectives; and |
|
|
|
|
strength in income and capital gains to support and grow the companys dividend
payments. |
Subject to the provisions of the employment agreements with the NEOs described below, the
Compensation Committee has the primary authority to establish compensation for the NEOs and other
key employees and administers all executive compensation arrangements and policies. Main Streets
Chief Executive Officer assists the Compensation Committee by providing annual recommendations
regarding the compensation of NEOs and other key employees, excluding himself. The Compensation
Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying or accepting those recommendations. The Chief
Executive Officer routinely attends Compensation Committee meetings. However, the Compensation
Committee also meets in executive session without the Chief Executive Officer or other members of
management present when discussing the Chief Executive Officers compensation and on certain other
occasions.
The Compensation Committee takes into account competitive market practices with respect to the
salaries and total direct compensation of the NEOs. Members of the Compensation Committee consider
market practices by reviewing proxy statements or similar information made available by other
internally managed business development companies, or BDCs, under the 1940 Act. The Compensation
Committee also has the authority to utilize compensation consultants to better understand
competitive pay practices. In this regard, the Compensation Committee engaged a compensation
consultant in late 2008 to study the level and structure of compensation paid to
12
our NEOs as compared to other internally managed business development companies, private
equity firms and specialty finance companies (both public and private). The Compensation Committee
is considering the findings of the compensation consultant but does not currently expect any
material changes to the compensation program for our NEOs.
Assessment of Market Data
To assess the competitiveness of executive compensation levels, the Compensation Committee
analyzes a comparative group of BDCs and reviews their competitive performance and compensation
levels. This analysis centers around key elements of compensation practices within the BDC industry
in general and, more specifically, compensation practices at internally managed BDCs reasonably
comparable in asset size, typical investment size and type, market capitalization and general
business scope to the company. Since there are relatively few internally managed BDCs, and because
of Main Streets relatively small asset size and market capitalization in comparison to many BDCs,
the Compensation Committee includes certain internally managed BDCs in Main Streets peer group
that are substantially larger than the company. The peer group consists of the following companies:
American Capital Strategies, Ltd., Allied Capital Corporation, Hercules Technology Growth Capital,
Inc., Kohlberg Capital Corporation, MCG Capital Corporation, Patriot Capital Funding, Inc., Harris
& Harris Group, Inc. and Triangle Capital Corporation.
Items reviewed include, but are not necessarily limited to, base compensation, bonus
compensation, equity option awards, restricted stock awards, and other compensation as detailed in
the respective proxies, research analysts reports and other publicly available information. In
addition to actual levels of compensation, the Compensation Committee also analyzes the approach
other BDCs are taking with regard to their compensation practices. Such items include, but are not
necessarily limited to, the use of employment agreements for certain employees, a mix of cash and
equity compensation, the use of third party compensation consultants and certain corporate and
executive performance measures established to achieve long-term total return for stockholders.
Although each of the peer companies is not precisely comparable in size, scope and operations to
the company, the Compensation Committee believes that they are the most relevant comparable
companies available with disclosed executive compensation data, and provide a good representation
of competitive compensation levels for the companys executives.
Assessment of Company Performance
The Compensation Committee believes that consistent financial performance coupled with
reasonable, long-term stockholders returns and proportional employee compensation are essential
components for Main Streets long-term business success. Main Street typically makes three to seven
year investments in lower middle-market companies. The companys business plan involves taking on
investment risk over an extended period of time, and a premium is placed on the ability to maintain
stability of net asset values and continuity of earnings to pass through to stockholders in the
form of recurring dividends. Main Streets strategy is to generate current income from debt
investments and to realize capital gains from equity-related investments. This income supports the
payment of dividends to stockholders. The recurring payment of dividends requires a methodical
investment acquisition approach and active monitoring and management of the investment portfolio
over time. A meaningful part of the companys employee base is dedicated to the maintenance of
asset values and expansion of this recurring income to support and grow dividends. The
Compensation Committee believes that stability with regard to the management team is important in
achieving successful implementation of the companys strategy.
Executive Compensation Components
For 2008, the components of Main Streets direct compensation program for NEOs include:
|
|
|
base salary; |
|
|
|
|
annual cash bonuses; |
|
|
|
|
long-term compensation pursuant to the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan; and |
13
The Compensation Committee designs each NEOs direct compensation package to appropriately
reward the NEO for his contribution to the company. The judgment and experience of the Compensation
Committee are weighed with performance metrics and consultation with the Chief Executive Officer to
determine the appropriate mix of compensation for each individual. Cash compensation consisting of
base salary and discretionary bonuses tied to achievement of individual performance goals reviewed
and approved by the Compensation Committee is intended to motivate NEOs to remain with the company
and work to achieve its business objectives. Stock-based compensation is awarded based on
performance expectations reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee for each NEO. The
blend of short-term and long-term compensation may be adjusted from time to time to balance the
Compensation Committees views regarding an NEOs individual preference for current cash
compensation with appropriate retention incentives.
Base Salary
Base salary is used to recognize particularly the experience, skills, knowledge and
responsibilities required of the NEOs in their roles. In connection with establishing the base
salary of each NEO, the Compensation Committee and management considered a number of factors,
including the seniority and experience level of the individual, the functional role of his
position, the level of the individuals responsibility, the companys ability to replace the
individual, the past base salary of the individual and the number of well-qualified candidates
available in the area. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers publicly available
information regarding the base salaries paid to similarly situated executive officers and other
competitive market practices.
The salaries of the NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis, as well as at the time of promotion
or any substantial change in responsibilities. Each of the NEO employment agreements establishes a
target for annual increase in base salary at 5%, but provides that any increase is at the sole
discretion of the Compensation Committee. Each such employment agreement also provides that the
base salary is not subject to reduction. The key factors in determining increases in salary level
are relative performance and competitive pressures.
Annual Cash Bonuses
Annual cash bonuses are intended to reward individual performance during the year and can
therefore be highly variable from year to year. Bonus opportunities for the NEOs are determined by
the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis and are based on performance criteria,
including corporate and individual performance goals and measures, set by the Compensation
Committee with the Chief Executive Officers input. As more fully described below in Employment
Agreements, the employment agreements of the NEOs provide for target annual cash bonus amounts as
a percentage of base salary.
Long-Term Incentive Awards
Main Streets Board and stockholders have approved the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to provide
stock-based awards as long-term incentive compensation to employees, including the NEOs. The
company uses stock-based awards to (i) attract and retain key employees, (ii) motivate employees by
means of performance-related incentives to achieve long-range performance goals, (iii) enable
employees to participate in the companys long-term growth and (iv) link employees compensation to
the long-term interests of stockholders. At the time of each award, the Compensation Committee will
determine the terms of the award, including any performance period (or periods) and any performance
objectives relating to vesting of the award.
Options. The Compensation Committee may grant equity options to purchase Main Streets common
stock (including incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options). The Compensation
Committee expects that any options granted by it will represent a fixed number of shares of common
stock, will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of common stock on the date of
grant, and will be exercisable, or vested, at some later time after grant. Some stock options may
provide for vesting simply by the grantee remaining employed by Main Street for a period of time,
and some may provide for vesting based on the grantee and/or the company attaining specified
performance levels. To date the Compensation Committee has not granted any stock options to any
NEO.
14
Restricted Stock. Main Street has received exemptive relief from the SEC that permits the
company to grant restricted stock in exchange for or in recognition of services by its executive
officers and employees. Pursuant to the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee may
award shares of restricted stock to plan participants in such amounts and on such terms as the
Compensation Committee determines in its sole discretion, provided that such awards are consistent
with the conditions set forth in the SECs exemptive order. Each restricted stock grant will be for
a fixed number of shares as set forth in an award agreement between the grantee and Main Street.
Award agreements will set forth time and/or performance vesting schedules and other appropriate
terms and/or restrictions with respect to awards, including rights to dividends and voting rights.
As more fully described below, each of the NEO employment agreements provides for a target annual
restricted stock award or an equitable substitute.
Other Benefits
Main Streets NEOs participate in the same benefit plans and programs as the companys other
employees, including comprehensive medical insurance, comprehensive dental insurance, business
travel accident insurance, short term disability coverage, long term disability insurance, and
vision care.
Main Street maintains a 401(k) plan for all full-time employees who are at least 21 years of
age through which the company makes non-discretionary matching contributions to each participants
plan account on the participants behalf. For each participating employee, the companys
contribution is generally a match of the employees contributions up to a 4.5% contribution level
with a maximum annual matching contribution of $10,350 during 2008. All contributions to the plan,
including the companys, vest immediately. The Board of Directors may also, at its sole discretion,
make additional contributions to employee 401(k) plan accounts, which would vest on the same basis
as other employer contributions.
Perquisites
The company provides no other material benefits, perquisites or retirement benefits to the
NEOs.
Employment Agreements
In connection with Main Streets initial public offering, the company entered into employment
agreements with each of its NEOs, other than Mr. Foster, its Chief Executive Officer. Initial terms
of the employment agreements extend to December 31, 2010. As the Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Foster does not have an employment agreement and will serve as an
executive officer at the direction and discretion of the Board of Directors. However, Mr. Foster
has executed a confidentiality and non-compete agreement with the company. The NEO employment
agreements specify an initial base salary which was paid in 2007 and contemplate a 5% target annual
increase in base salary (provided that any increase is in the sole discretion of the Compensation
Committee).
Each NEO employment agreement specifies a target discretionary annual bonus as a percentage of
his then current base salary based upon achieving the performance objectives established by the
Compensation Committee. Under the NEO employment agreements, the applicable NEOs have referenced
target bonus amounts for each of the years ending December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010. The target
bonus amounts for Mr. Reppert are 50%, 60% and 70% of his base salary, respectively, for each of
those three calendar years. The target bonus amounts for Messrs. Stout, Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol
are 40%, 50% and 60% of their base salaries for each of those three calendar years, respectively.
The Compensation Committee has established applicable individual performance objectives, and will
approve the actual bonus awarded to each NEO annually.
Each NEO employment agreement also provides for the initial grant of restricted stock in an
amount equal to 40,000 shares for Mr. Reppert and 30,000 shares for each of Messrs. Stout, Hartman,
Hyzak and Magdol in respect of such executives service performed in 2007, including in connection
with the successful completion of the companys initial public offering, and in 2008. As discussed
below, initial grants of restricted stock related to this provision were made to the NEOs on July
1, 2008. In addition, the NEO employment agreements provide for targeted annual restricted stock
awards for each of calendar years 2009 and 2010 with date of grant valuation of 75%
15
of base salary for Mr. Reppert and date of grant valuation of 50% of base salaries for each of
Messrs. Stout, Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol, in each case subject to the Compensation Committees
discretion based on the satisfaction of objective, reasonable and attainable performance criteria
established by the Compensation Committee. Restricted stock awards will generally vest in equal
annual portions over the four years subsequent to the date of grant.
The NEO employment agreements also provide for certain severance and other benefits upon
termination after a change of control or certain other specified termination events. The severance
and other benefits in these circumstances are discussed below and reflected in the Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change of Control Table.
Mr. Repperts employment agreement generally provides for a non-competition period after his
voluntary termination or a termination without cause by the company. However, Messrs. Stout,
Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol would generally only be subject to the non-competition provisions of
their employment agreements in the event they are terminated without cause. The NEO employment
agreements also provide for a non-solicitation period after any termination of employment and
provide for the protection of Main Streets confidential information.
Change in Control and Severance
Upon a change in control, equity-based awards under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan may vest
and/or become immediately exercisable or salable. In addition, upon termination of employment
following a change in control, the NEOs who are parties to the NEO employment agreements may be
entitled to severance payments.
2008 Equity Incentive Plan. Upon specified transactions involving a change in control (as
defined in the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan), all outstanding awards under the 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan may either be assumed or substituted for by the surviving entity. If the surviving entity does
not assume or substitute similar awards, the awards held by the plan participants will be subject
to accelerated vesting in full and, in the case of options, then terminated to the extent not
exercised within a designated time period.
Transactions involving a change in control under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan include:
|
|
|
a consolidation, merger, stock sale or similar transaction or series of related
transactions in which Main Street is not the surviving corporation or which results in
the acquisition of all or substantially all of the companys then outstanding common
stock by a single person or entity or by a group of persons and/or entities acting in
concert; |
|
|
|
|
a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the companys assets; |
|
|
|
|
Main Streets dissolution or liquidation; or |
|
|
|
|
a change in the membership of the companys Board of Directors such that the
individuals who, as of the effective date of the plan, constitute the Board of
Directors, whom are referred to as the Continuing Directors, and any new director whose
election or nomination by the Board of Directors was approved by a vote of at least a
majority of the Continuing Directors, cease to constitute at least a majority of the
Board. |
Severance. Under specified transactions involving a change in control (as defined in each NEO
employment agreement), if an NEO who is a party to an NEO employment agreement terminates his
employment with Main Street for good reason within one year following such change in control, or if
the company terminates or fails to renew the NEOs employment agreement within the one year
commencing with a change in control, he will receive a severance package beginning on the date of
termination. The severance package will include a lump-sum payment equal to two or three times,
depending upon the NEOs position, the NEOs annual salary at that time, plus the NEOs target
bonus compensation as described in the employment agreement, and the company will continue to
provide the NEO with certain benefits provided to him immediately prior to the termination as
described in the employment agreement for a designated time period.
16
Under the employment agreements, a Change in Control occurs if:
|
|
|
A person or a group acquires ownership of Main Streets capital stock that, together
with stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50 percent of the total
fair market value or total voting power of the companys capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
a person or a group acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on
the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) ownership of capital
stock possessing 30 percent or more of the total voting power of the companys capital
stock; |
|
|
|
|
a majority of members of the Board is replaced during any 12-month period by
directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of
the Board prior to the date of such appointment or election; or |
|
|
|
|
a person or a group acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on
the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) company assets that
have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40 percent of the total
gross fair market value of all of the companys assets immediately prior to such
acquisition or acquisitions. Certain transfers of assets are not considered a change in
control if transferred to specified parties. |
The rationale behind providing a severance package in certain events is (1) to attract and
retain dedicated and talented executives and to provide such executives with reasonable financial
remuneration and restitution in the event of dislocation and disruption of employment as a result
of involuntary severance, and (2) to maintain and maximize shareholder value through the management
teams commitment and fidelity to the integrity of a change-in-control transaction. For further
discussion regarding executive compensation in the event of a termination or change in control,
please see the table entitled Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table
included in this proxy statement.
Tax Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a deduction to public
companies to the extent of excess annual compensation over $1 million paid to certain executive
officers, except for qualified performance-based compensation. Main Streets general policy, where
consistent with business objectives, is to preserve the deductibility of executive officer
compensation. The Compensation Committee may authorize forms of compensation that might not be
deductible if the Compensation Committee deems such to be in the best interests of Main Street and
its stockholders. The company had no nondeductible compensation paid to executive officers in 2008.
2008 Compensation Determination
The Compensation Committee analyzed the competitiveness of the components of compensation
described above on both an individual and aggregate basis. The Compensation Committee believes
that the total compensation paid to the NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 achieves
the overall objectives of Main Streets executive compensation program.
Determination of Annual Base Salary
The Compensation Committee annually reviews the base salary of each executive officer,
including each NEO, and determines whether or not to increase it in its sole discretion. Increases
to base salary can be awarded to recognize, among other things, relative performance, relative cost
of living and competitive pressures. Increases in the 2008 annual base salary of each NEO over his
2007 annualized base salary are based exclusively on the loss by such NEO of certain benefits that
were received prior to the companys initial public offering. Without the adjustments described in
the previous sentence, the 2008 base salary of each NEO would have been equal to such NEOs 2007
annualized base salary.
17
Mr. Foster was paid an annual base salary of $353,910 for 2008, an increase of 1.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Reppert was paid an annual base salary of $316,410 for 2008, an increase of 1.7% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Stout was paid an annual base salary of $215,160 for 2008, an increase of 2.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Hartman was paid an annual base salary of $215,160 for 2008, an increase of 2.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Hyzak was paid an annual base salary of $215,160 for 2008, an increase of 2.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Magdol was paid an annual base salary of $215,160 for 2008, an increase of 2.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Determination of Annual Cash Incentive Bonus
Cash bonuses are determined annually by the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis.
Cash bonuses for 2008 were accrued in 2008 but were determined by the Compensation Committee and
paid to NEOs in the first quarter of 2009. The 2008 target cash bonus percentage of base salary
for each NEO is presented below as well as the actual cash bonus percentage of base salary for each
NEO in 2008. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may award cash bonuses that exceed
cash bonus targets if it believes that the performance of the NEO during the given year merits such
a bonus. The company did not pay a cash bonus to any NEO in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual % of |
|
|
Target % of |
|
2008 Salary |
Named Executive Officer |
|
2008 Salary |
|
Awarded |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
David L. Magdol |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
The Compensation Committee considered performance achievements in the determination of cash
bonuses for 2008, including company performance and the personal performance of each individual.
The performance goals used for determining the cash bonuses for NEOs included, among other things,
the following:
|
|
|
Maintaining liquidity and capital flexibility to accomplish the companys business
objectives; |
|
|
|
|
Maintaining appropriate dividend payouts to stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
Maintaining the highest ethical standards, internal controls and adherence to
regulatory requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
Maintaining reasonable relative overall portfolio performance. |
Based on a recommendation by Mr. Foster in light of the current economic environment, the
Compensation Committee did not award Mr. Foster a 2008 cash bonus but will however consider
awarding Mr. Foster additional restricted stock in 2009 in lieu thereof. Cash bonuses were paid as
shown below to other NEOs for 2008 performance. These bonuses are
less than specified in the individual employment
18
contracts of the NEOs but do not
reflect negatively on any individual executives performance. Instead, these bonus amounts
reflect the Compensation Committees and the executives desire to maintain an appropriate
operating cost level in a difficult economic environment.
Mr. Reppert was paid an annual cash bonus of $115,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Repperts performance as President and CFO during very turbulent market conditions and
particularly his leadership in strengthening the companys liquidity and capital flexibility.
Mr. Stout was paid an annual cash bonus of $75,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Stouts management of internal control, financial and accounting responsibilities while
transitioning to treasury and compliance accountability.
Mr. Hartman was paid an annual cash bonus of $75,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Hartmans performance in managing current portfolio investments, executing new investment
opportunities and developing and training Main Street personnel.
Mr. Hyzak was paid an annual cash bonus of $75,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Hyzaks performance in managing current portfolio investments, executing new investment
opportunities and developing and training Main Street personnel.
Mr. Magdol was paid an annual cash bonus of $75,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Magdols performance in managing current portfolio investments, executing new investment
opportunities and developing and training Main Street personnel.
Determination of Long-Term Incentive Awards
As contemplated by each NEOs employment agreement, after approval of the 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan by the stockholders, each NEO was granted shares of restricted stock under the plan,
effective July 1, 2008. The 2008 target grant amount of restricted shares for each NEO is
presented below as well as the actual 2008 grant amount of restricted shares awarded to each NEO.
All restricted stock grants to NEOs under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan vest ratably over four
years from the grant date. Messrs. Foster and Reppert recommended that the Compensation Committee
reallocate a portion of their individual grants of restricted shares to other company employees,
including Messrs. Stout, Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol, for their diligence and dedication in
connection with the successful initial public offering of the company in October 2007 and in the
implementation of the companys strategies in 2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Number of |
|
Actual Number of |
Named Executive Officer |
|
Restricted Shares |
|
Restricted Shares Granted |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
David L. Magdol |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
19
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy
statement with Main Streets management and, based on our review and discussions, we recommended to
the Board of Directors of Main Street that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in
this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Arthur L. French, Chair
Joseph E. Canon
William D. Gutermuth
|
|
20
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table summarizes compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our President and
Chief Financial Officer and our four highest paid executive officers who did not serve as our Chief
Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer during 2008, all of whom we refer to as our NEOs, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
All Other |
|
|
Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary(1) |
|
Bonus(2) |
|
Awards(3) |
|
Compensation(4) |
|
Total |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
353,910 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,400 |
(5) |
|
$ |
431,310 |
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
87,188 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
89,719 |
|
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
316,410 |
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,400 |
(6) |
|
$ |
508,810 |
|
President & Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
77,813 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
80,344 |
|
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer, Senior
Vice President Finance and |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
215,160 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
52,500 |
|
|
$ |
35,072 |
(7) |
|
$ |
377,732 |
|
Administration and Treasurer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
54,863 |
|
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
215,160 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,750 |
|
|
$ |
33,570 |
(8) |
|
$ |
372,480 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
55,031 |
|
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
215,160 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
52,500 |
|
|
$ |
35,407 |
(9) |
|
$ |
378,067 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
55,031 |
|
|
David L. Magdol |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
215,160 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,750 |
|
|
$ |
33,570 |
(10) |
|
$ |
372,480 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
55,031 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2007 salary amounts reflect the actual salaries of the NEOs that were in
effect during the period from October 4, 2007, the completion of our initial
public offering, through December 31, 2007. All executive compensation is paid
by one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, Main Street Capital Partners, LLC. |
|
(2) |
|
These amounts reflect annual cash bonuses earned during 2008 by
the NEOs and were determined based on individual performance goals adopted by
the Compensation Committee. No cash bonuses were paid to NEOs in 2007. All
annual cash bonuses are paid by one of our wholly owned
subsidiaries, Main Street Capital Partners, LLC. |
|
(3) |
|
These amounts represent the dollar amount recognized for financial statement
reporting purposes with respect to the 2008 fiscal year for the fair value of
awards granted in 2008 as well as prior fiscal years, if any, as determined in
accordance with FAS 123R. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the
impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
Please see the discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of these
awards in Note M to the audited consolidated financial statements included in
the annual report accompanying this proxy statement. These amounts reflect our
accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value
that will be recognized by our NEOs. |
|
(4) |
|
For 2008, these amounts reflect (i) employer matching contributions we made to
our 401(k) Plan and (ii) the dollar value of dividends paid on unvested restricted
stock awards. For 2007, these amounts reflect employer matching contributions
we made to our 401(k) Plan during the period from October 4, 2007, the completion
of our initial public offering, through December 31, 2007. We make matching
contributions for each semi-monthly payroll period. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes $10,350 employer matching contributions to our 401(k) Plan and $22,050
dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes $10,350 employer matching contributions to our 401(k) Plan and $22,050
dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
21
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Includes $25,725 dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes $23,888 dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes $25,725 dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes $23,888 dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding restricted stock awards granted to our
NEOs in fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards; |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
of Stock |
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
Stock |
|
Awards |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
420,000 |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
420,000 |
|
David L. Magdol |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth the awards of restricted stock for which forfeiture provisions
were outstanding at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value of |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Shares of |
|
|
of Stock that |
|
Stock that have not |
Name |
|
have not Vested (#)(1) |
|
Vested ($)(2) |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
293,100 |
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
293,100 |
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
341,950 |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
317,525 |
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
341,950 |
|
David L. Magdol |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
317,525 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No restricted stock awards have been transferred. |
|
(2) |
|
The market value of shares of stock that have not vested was
determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2008, which was $9.77. |
22
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Each NEO, other than our Chief Executive Officer (who has signed a non-compete agreement and
serves at the discretion of our Board of Directors), is entitled under his employment agreement to
certain payments upon termination of employment or in the event of a change in control. The
following table sets forth those potential payments as of December 31, 2008 with respect to each
applicable NEO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
After Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause |
|
Control; Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
or Good |
|
Without Cause or |
|
|
Benefit |
|
Death(3) |
|
Disability(3) |
|
with Cause(4) |
|
Reason(3)(4) |
|
Good Reason(3)(4) |
Todd A. Reppert |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
632,820 |
|
|
$ |
949,230 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379,692 |
|
|
|
569,538 |
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740 |
|
|
|
430,320 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,370 |
|
|
|
215,160 |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740 |
|
|
|
430,320 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,370 |
|
|
|
215,160 |
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740 |
|
|
|
430,320 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,370 |
|
|
|
215,160 |
|
David L. Magdol |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740 |
|
|
|
430,320 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,370 |
|
|
|
215,160 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Severance pay includes an NEOs annual base salary and applicable
multiple thereof paid monthly beginning at the time of termination or
paid in lump-sum if termination is within one year of a change in
control. |
|
(2) |
|
Bonus compensation includes an NEOs current target annual bonus and
applicable multiple thereof paid monthly beginning at the time of
termination or paid lump-sum if termination is within one year of a
change in control. |
|
(3) |
|
Upon these termination events, the NEO will become fully vested in any
previously unvested stock-based compensation. |
|
(4) |
|
For a discussion of how the employment agreements define the term
Change of Control, see Compensation Discussion and AnalysisChange
in Control and Severance. The employment agreements define Cause as
conviction of a felony or other crime of moral turpitude; failure or
refusal to perform all duties and obligations; gross negligence or
willful misconduct to our material detriment; or the material breach
of the employment agreement or any provision of a uniformly applied
policy such as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The employment
agreements define Good Reason as the existence, without the
executives consent, of any of the following conditions at any time
during the two years prior to the executives termination: a material
diminution in an executives base salary, target bonus or authority
and duties (not including any position on our Board of Directors);
implementation of a requirement that the executive report to an
employee or corporate officer rather than directly to the Chairman of
the Board and the Chief Executive Officer or a material diminution in
the authority and responsibilities of the executives supervisor; a
material change in the location where the executives duties are to be
performed; or the material breach by us of the employment agreement,
including the failure of any successor to us to assume the terms of
the agreement. |
23
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our
common stock by:
|
|
|
each person known to us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding
shares of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
each of our directors and executive officers; and |
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group. |
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting
or investment power with respect to the securities. There is no common stock subject to options
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2009. Percentage of
beneficial ownership is based on 9,076,139 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 20, 2009.
Unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, each stockholder listed below has sole voting
and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the stockholder, and
maintains an address c/o Main Street Capital Corporation. Our address is 1300 Post Oak Boulevard,
Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Owned Beneficially |
Name |
|
Number |
|
Percentage |
Independent Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Appling Jr. |
|
|
19,239 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph E. Canon |
|
|
292,620 |
(1) |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Arthur L. French |
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William D. Gutermuth |
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Interested Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
1,068,785 |
(2) |
|
|
11.78 |
% |
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
654,089 |
(3) |
|
|
7.21 |
% |
Executive Officers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
67,537 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jason B. Beauvais |
|
|
9,176 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael S. Galvan |
|
|
8,575 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
227,972 |
(4) |
|
|
2.51 |
% |
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
239,486 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
% |
David L. Magdol |
|
|
247,767 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
% |
All Directors and Officers as a Group (12 persons) |
|
|
2,861,443 |
|
|
|
31.53 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
Includes (i) 63,121 shares of common stock held by the Dodge Jones Foundation for
which Mr. Canon has sole voting and investment power as Executive Vice President and
(ii) 218,183 shares of common stock held by JMK Investments, LP for which Mr. Canon
has shared voting and investment power as co-manager of its general partner. Mr.
Canon disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held by the Dodge Jones
Foundation and JMK Investments, LP. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 7,629 shares of common stock held by Foster Irrevocable Trust for the
benefit of Mr. Fosters children. Although Mr. Foster is not the trustee, and
accordingly does not have voting power or dispositive power over these shares, he
may from time to time direct the trustee to vote and dispose of these shares. Also
includes 2,222 shares and 2,175 shares held in custodial accounts for Mr. Fosters
daughters, Amy Foster and Brittany Foster, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 142,387 shares of common stock held by Reppert Investments Limited
Partnership which are beneficially owned by Mr. Reppert. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 188,947 shares of common stock held in margin accounts or otherwise pledged. |
24
The following table sets forth, as of March 20, 2009, the dollar range of our equity
securities that is beneficially owned by each of our directors.
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity |
|
|
Securities Beneficially |
|
|
Owned(1)(2)(3) |
Interested Directors: |
|
|
Vincent D. Foster
|
|
over $100,000 |
Todd A. Reppert
|
|
over $100,000 |
Independent Directors: |
|
|
Michael Appling Jr.
|
|
over $100,000 |
Joseph E. Canon
|
|
over $100,000 |
Arthur L. French
|
|
over $100,000 |
William D. Gutermuth
|
|
over $100,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) of the Exchange Act. |
|
(2) |
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by our directors is based on a stock
price of $9.47 per share as of March 20, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned are: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000,
$50,001-$100,000, or over $100,000. |
25
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to review Main Street Capital
Corporations financial matters. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence
requirements established by the 1940 Act and under the applicable listing standards of the Nasdaq
Stock Market. The Audit Committee is responsible for the selection, engagement, compensation,
retention and oversight of Main Streets independent registered public accounting firm. We are also
responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors that Main Streets audited financial
statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year.
In making our recommendation that Main Streets financial statements be included in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, we have taken the following steps:
|
|
|
We discussed with Grant Thornton LLP, or Grant Thornton, Main Streets independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2008, those matters
required to be discussed by Statements on Auditing Standards Nos. 61 and 90, each as
amended, issued by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, including information regarding the scope and results of the audit.
These communications and discussions are intended to assist us in overseeing the financial
reporting and disclosure process. |
|
|
|
|
We conducted periodic executive sessions with Grant Thornton, with no members of Main
Streets management present during those discussions. Grant Thornton did not identify any
material audit issues, questions or discrepancies, other than those previously discussed
with management, which were resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. |
|
|
|
|
We received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Grant Thornton
required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
regarding Grant Thorntons communications with us concerning independence, and we discussed
with Grant Thornton its independence from Main Street. We also considered whether the
provision of nonaudit services to Main Street is compatible with Grant Thorntons
independence. |
|
|
|
|
We determined that there were no former Grant Thornton employees, who previously
participated in the Main Street audit, engaged in a financial reporting oversight role at
Main Street. |
|
|
|
|
We reviewed, and discussed with Main Streets management and Grant Thornton, Main
Streets audited consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008, and consolidated
statements of income, changes in net assets and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2008. |
Based on the reviews and actions described above, we recommended to the Board of Directors
that Main Streets audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Michael Appling Jr., Chair
Joseph E. Canon
Arthur L. French
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE SALE OF COMMON STOCK, WITH APPROVAL OF OUR BOARD
OF DIRECTORS, DURING THE NEXT YEAR AT A PRICE BELOW NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
(ITEM 2)
We are a closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as BDC under the 1940
Act. The 1940 Act prohibits us from selling shares of our common stock at a price below the current
net asset value per share, or NAV, of such stock, with certain exceptions. One such exception would
permit us to sell shares of our common stock during the next year at a price below the then
current NAV if our stockholders approve such a sale and our Board of Directors makes certain
determinations. Pursuant to this provision and in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act,
we are seeking the approval of our stockholders so that we may sell or otherwise issue shares of
our common stock, in one or more public or private offerings, at a price per share below our then
current NAV, subject to certain conditions discussed below. If approved, the authorization would be
effective for a period expiring on the earlier of the anniversary of the date of the 2009 Annual
Meeting or the date of our 2010 Annual Meeting, which is expected to be held in June 2010.
Generally, equity securities sold in public securities offerings are priced based on market
prices, rather than NAV. We are seeking the approval of our common stockholders to offer and sell
shares of common stock at prices that, net of underwriting discount or commissions, may be less
than NAV so as to permit the flexibility in pricing that market conditions generally require.
Reasons to Offer Common Stock below NAV
Beginning in late 2007, the United States entered a recession. Throughout 2008, the economy
continued to deteriorate and many believe that the current recession could continue for an extended
period. During 2008, banks and others in the financial services industry reported significant
write-downs in the fair value of their assets, which has led to the failure of a number of banks
and investment companies, a number of distressed mergers and acquisitions, the government take-over
of the nations two largest government-sponsored mortgage companies, and the passage of the $700
billion Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 in October 2008 and the recently enacted $787
billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. In addition, the stock market has declined
significantly, with both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Global Select Market (on which our stock
trades), declining by nearly 40% between December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008. As the recession
deepened during 2008, unemployment rose and consumer confidence declined, which led to significant
reductions in spending by both consumers and businesses. All of this has led to significant stock
price volatility for capital providers such as Main Street and has made access to capital more
challenging for many firms. However, for firms that continue to have access to capital, the current
environment may provide more attractive investment opportunities than have been available in recent
periods. Our ability to take advantage of these opportunities will depend on our access to equity
capital.
As a BDC and a regulated investment company, or RIC, for tax purposes, Main Street is
dependent on its ability to raise capital through the issuance of common stock. RICs generally must
distribute substantially all of their earnings to stockholders as dividends in order to achieve
pass-through tax treatment, which prevents us from using those earnings to support new investments.
Further, BDCs must maintain a debt to equity ratio of no more than 1:1, which requires us to
finance our investments with at least as much equity as debt in the aggregate. In order to continue
to build our investment portfolio, and thereby support or grow our dividends, we endeavor to
periodically have access to capital through the public and private equity markets, enabling us to
take advantage of favorable investment opportunities as they arise.
Although our common stock has had a limited trading history, it has traded both at a premium
and at a discount in relation to NAV. The possibilities that shares of our common stock will trade
at a discount from NAV or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term are separate and
distinct from the risk that our NAV will decrease. It is not possible to predict whether any shares
of our common stock issued in the future will trade at, above or below NAV. The following table
lists the high and low sales prices for our common stock for each quarter since our initial public
offering, and the sales price as a percentage of NAV. On March 20, 2009, the last reported closing
sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $9.47 per share.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range |
|
High Sales |
|
Low Sales |
|
|
NAV(1) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Price to NAV(2) |
|
Price to NAV(2) |
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (to March
20, 2009) |
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
10.43 |
|
|
$ |
9.07 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
12.20 |
|
|
$ |
11.95 |
|
|
$ |
8.82 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
Third Quarter |
|
|
12.49 |
|
|
|
14.40 |
|
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
13.02 |
|
|
|
14.40 |
|
|
|
10.90 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
12.87 |
|
|
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
12.75 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 5, 2007 to
December 31, 2007(3) |
|
$ |
12.85 |
|
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
|
$ |
13.60 |
|
|
|
117 |
% |
|
|
106 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share, or NAV, is determined as of the last day in the
relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset value per share
on the date of the high and low sales prices. The net asset values shown are
based on outstanding shares at the end of each period. Net asset value has
not yet been determined for the first quarter of 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as the respective high or low share price divided by NAV. |
|
(3) |
|
Our stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on October 5, 2007. |
The unprecedented nature of the current credit market dislocation and uncertainty surrounding
the U.S. economy has led to significant stock market volatility, particularly with respect to the
stock of financial services companies. During times of increased price volatility, our common stock
may periodically trade below its NAV, which is not uncommon for business development companies. As
noted above, however, the current market dislocation has created, and we believe will continue to
create, favorable opportunities to invest, including opportunities that, all else being equal, may
increase NAV over the longer-term, even if financed with the issuance of common stock below NAV. We
expect to periodically be presented with attractive opportunities that require us to make an
investment commitment quickly, and we may be unable to capitalize on investment opportunities
presented unless we are able to quickly raise capital. Stockholder approval of the proposal to sell
shares below NAV, subject to the conditions detailed below, will provide us with the flexibility to
invest in those opportunities.
In addition, the recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 contained,
among other things, a provision that increases the maximum amount of combined small business
investment company, or SBIC, leverage (or SBIC leverage cap) from approximately $137 million to
$225 million for affiliated SBIC funds. Due to the increase in the maximum amount of SBIC leverage
available to affiliated SBIC funds, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Main Street Mezzanine
Fund, LP (the Fund), will now have access to incremental SBIC leverage to support
our future
investment activities. Since the increase in the SBIC leverage cap applies to affiliated SBIC
funds, we will allocate the increased borrowing capacity between the Fund and Main Street Capital
II, LP, a privately owned SBIC that we manage and therefore deemed to be affiliated with the
Fund for SBIC regulatory purposes. We currently estimate that at least $55 million to $60 million
of additional SBIC leverage is now accessible to us, through the Fund, for future investment
activities. To fully access such additional SBIC leverage under SBIC regulations, we may be
required to further capitalize the Fund. Stockholder approval of the proposal to sell shares below
NAV, subject to the conditions detailed below, will provide us with the flexibility in capitalizing
the Fund.
Our Board of Directors believes that having the flexibility to issue our common stock below
NAV in certain instances is in the best interests of our stockholders. If we were unable to access
the capital markets as attractive investment opportunities arise, our ability to grow over time and
continue to pay steady dividends to our stockholders could be adversely affected. It could also
have the effect of forcing us to sell assets that we would not otherwise sell, and such sales could
occur at times that are disadvantageous to sell.
28
Conditions to Sales Below NAV
If our stockholders approve this proposal, we will only sell shares of our common stock at a
price below NAV if the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
a majority of our independent directors who have no financial interest in the sale have
approved the sale; and |
|
|
|
|
a majority of such directors, who are not interested persons of Main Street, in
consultation with the underwriter or underwriters of the offering if it is to be
underwritten, have determined in good faith, and as of a time immediately prior to the
first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm commitments to purchase such shares or
immediately prior to the issuance of such shares, that the price at which such shares are
to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates the market value of those
shares, less any underwriting commission or discount. |
Key Stockholder Considerations
Before voting on this proposal or giving proxies with regard to this matter, you should
consider the potentially dilutive effect of the issuance of shares of our common stock at less than
NAV on the net asset value per outstanding share of common stock. Any sale of our common stock at a
price below NAV would result in an immediate dilution to our existing stockholders. This dilution
would include reduction in NAV as a result of the issuance of shares at a price below NAV and a
proportionately greater decrease in a stockholders interest in our earnings and assets and in
voting interest than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance. Our Board of
Directors will consider the potential dilutive effect of the issuance of shares at a price below
NAV when considering whether to authorize any such issuance.
The 1940 Act establishes a connection between common share sale price and NAV because, when
stock is sold at a sale price below NAV, the resulting increase in the number of outstanding shares
is not accompanied by a proportionate increase in the net assets of the issuer. Stockholders should
also consider that they will have no subscription, preferential or preemptive rights to additional
shares of our common stock that may be authorized for issuance, and thus any future issuance of our
common stock will dilute such stockholders holdings of common stock as a percentage of shares
outstanding to the extent stockholders do not purchase sufficient shares in the offering or
otherwise to maintain their percentage interest. Further, if our current stockholders do not
purchase any shares to maintain their percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is
above or below the then current NAV, their voting power will be diluted. For an illustration on
the potential dilutive effect of an offering of our common stock at a price below NAV, please see
the chart below under the heading Example of Dilutive Effect of the Issuance of Shares Below NAV.
Any sale of substantial amounts of our common stock or other securities in the open market may
adversely affect the market price of our common stock and may adversely affect our ability to
obtain future financing in the capital markets. In addition, future sales of our common stock to
the public may create a potential market overhang, which is the existence of a large block of
shares readily available for sale that could lead the market to discount the value of shares held
by other investors.
Example of Dilutive Effect of the Issuance of Shares Below NAV
Assume that Company XYZ has 1,000,000 total shares outstanding, $15,000,000 in total assets
and $5,000,000 in total liabilities. The net asset value per share of the common stock of Company
XYZ is $10.00. The following table illustrates the reduction to net asset value, or NAV, and the
dilution experienced by Stockholder A following the sale of 40,000 shares of the common stock of
Company XYZ at $9.50 per share, a price below its NAV per share.
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale |
|
Following Sale |
|
Percentage |
|
|
Below NAV |
|
Below NAV |
|
Change |
Reduction to NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,040,000 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
NAV per share |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.98 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Dilution to Existing Stockholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Percentage Held by Stockholder A |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
Total Interest of Stockholder A in NAV |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
99,808 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes that Stockholder A does not purchase additional shares in the sale of shares
below NAV. |
Required Vote
Pursuant to the 1940 Act, approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of: (1) a
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting; and (2)
a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting that
are not held by affiliated persons of Main Street, which includes directors, officers, employees,
and 5% stockholders.
For purposes of this proposal, the 1940 Act defines a majority of the outstanding shares as:
(A) 67% or more of the voting securities present at the Annual Meeting if the holders of more than
50% of the outstanding voting securities of Main Street are present or represented by proxy; or (B)
50% of the outstanding voting securities of Main Street, whichever is the less. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against this proposal.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO
AUTHORIZE US, WITH APPROVAL OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS, TO SELL SHARES OF OUR
COMMON STOCK DURING THE NEXT YEAR AT A PRICE BELOW OUR THEN CURRENT NET
ASSET VALUE PER SHARE.
30
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009
(ITEM 3)
Our Board of Directors has ratified the decision of the Audit Committee to appoint Grant
Thornton LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial
statements for the year ending December 31, 2009. No determination has been made as to what action
the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors would take if our stockholders fail to ratify the
appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee retains discretion to appoint
a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee concludes
such a change would be in the best interests of Main Street. We expect that representatives of
Grant Thornton LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a
statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.
For the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Main Street incurred the
following fees for services provided by Grant Thornton, including expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 (1) |
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
377,775 |
|
|
$ |
990,829 |
|
Audit Related Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees |
|
$ |
377,775 |
|
|
$ |
1,040,829 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fees incurred for 2007 include, in addition to the
fees related to the fiscal year 2007 audit, those fees
and expenses related to the audits of prior year
financial statements in connection with our initial
public offering. |
Audit Fees. Audit fees include fees for services that normally would be provided by the
accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and that generally
only the independent accountant can provide. In addition to fees for the audit of our annual
financial statements, the audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting and the review of our quarterly financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards, this category contains fees for comfort letters, statutory audits,
consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Audit Related Fees. Audit related fees are assurance related services that traditionally are
performed by the independent accountant, such as attest services that are not required by statute
or regulation.
Tax Fees. Tax fees include corporate and subsidiary compliance and consulting.
All Other Fees. Fees for other services would include fees for products and services other
than the services reported above.
It is the policy of our Audit Committee to preapprove all audit, review or attest engagements
and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting
firm, subject to, and in compliance with, the de minimis exception for non-audit services described
in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC. Our Audit Committee did not rely on the de minimis exception for any of the
fees disclosed above.
The proxy holders will vote all proxies received for approval of this proposal unless
instructed otherwise. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting,
in person or by proxy, is required to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP to serve as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. Abstentions
will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will not have any
effect on the result of the vote.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF
GRANT THORNTON LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR
THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009
31
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with Related Persons
We co-invested with Main Street Capital II, LP in several existing portfolio investments prior
to our initial public offering (the IPO), but did not co-invest with Main Street Capital II, LP
subsequent to the IPO and prior to June 2008. In June 2008, we received exemptive relief from the
SEC to allow us to resume co-investing with Main Street Capital II, LP in accordance with the terms
of such exemptive relief. Main Street Capital II, LP is managed by Main Street Capital Partners,
LLC, and Main Street Capital Partners, LLC is wholly owned by us. Main Street Capital II, LP is
a privately owned SBIC fund with similar investment objectives to us and which began its investment operations in
January 2006. The co-investments among us and Main Street Capital II, LP have all been made at the
same time and on the same terms and conditions. The co-investments were also made in accordance
with Main Street Capital Partners, LLCs conflicts policy and in accordance with the applicable
SBIC conflict of interest regulations.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2008, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries,
Main Street Capital Partners, LLC, received $3.3 million from Main Street Capital II, L.P. for
providing investment advisory services to Main Street Capital II, L.P. Messrs. Foster and Reppert
control the general partner of Main Street Capital II, L.P.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Parties
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into transactions with portfolio companies that
may be considered related party transactions. In order to ensure that we do not engage in any
prohibited transactions with any persons affiliated with us, we have implemented certain policies
and procedures whereby our executive officers screen each of our transactions for any possible
affiliations, close or remote, between the proposed portfolio investment, us, companies controlled
by us and our employees and directors. We will not enter into any agreements unless and until we
are satisfied that no affiliations prohibited by the 1940 Act exist or, if such affiliations exist,
we have taken appropriate actions to seek board review and approval or exemptive relief for such
transaction. Our Board of Directors reviews these procedures on an annual basis.
As required by the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards, the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors is required to review and approve any transactions with related
parties (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K). There have been no transactions
with related parties subsequent to our initial public offering.
In addition, our code of business conduct and ethics, which is applicable to all our all
employees, officers and directors, requires that all employees, officers and directors avoid any
conflict, or the appearance of a conflict, between an individuals personal interests and our
interests. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available at http://mainstcapital.com under
Governance in the Investor Relations section of our Web site.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive
officers, and persons who own 10% or more of our voting stock, to file reports of ownership and
changes in ownership of our equity securities with the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market. Directors,
executive officers and 10% or more holders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of those forms
furnished to us, or written representations that no such forms were required, we believe that our
directors, executive officers and 10% or more beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a)
filing requirements during the year ended December 31, 2008, except for (i) late filings on Form 4
related to Mr. Fosters purchases of our common stock on June 27, 2008 and June 30, 2008 and (ii) a
late filing on Form 3 related to Mr. Galvans appointment as Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer by our Board of Directors on February 6, 2008.
32
STOCKHOLDERS PROPOSALS
Any stockholder who wishes to have a qualified proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy
statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting must send notice of the proposal to our Corporate Secretary
at our principal executive office no later than _____, 2010. If you make such a proposal, you must
provide your name, address, the number of shares of common stock you hold of record or
beneficially, the date or dates on which such common stock was acquired and documentary support for
any claim of beneficial ownership.
In addition, any stockholder who intends to submit a proposal for consideration at our 2010
Annual Meeting, whether or not for inclusion in our proxy materials, or who intends to submit
nominees for election as directors at the meeting must notify our Corporate Secretary. Under our
by-laws, such notice must (1) be received at our executive offices no earlier than _______, 2009
or later than _______, 2010 and (2) satisfy specified requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors,
JASON B. BEAUVAIS
Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: _______ __, 2009
33
PRIVACY NOTICE
We are committed to protecting your privacy. This privacy notice explains the privacy policies
of Main Street and its affiliated companies. This notice supersedes any other privacy notice you
may have received from Main Street, and its terms apply both to our current stockholders and to
former stockholders as well.
We will safeguard, according to strict standards of security and confidentiality, all
information we receive about you. The only information we collect from you is your name, address,
and number of shares you hold. This information is used only so that we can send you annual reports
and other information about us, and send you proxy statements or other information required by law.
We do not share this information with any non-affiliated third party except as described
below.
|
|
|
The People and Companies that Make Up Main Street. It is our policy that only our
authorized employees who need to know your personal information will have access to it. Our
personnel who violate our privacy policy are subject to disciplinary action. |
|
|
|
|
Service Providers. We may disclose your personal information to companies that provide
services on our behalf, such as record keeping, processing your trades, and mailing you
information. These companies are required to protect your information and use it solely for
the purpose for which they received it. |
|
|
|
|
Courts and Government Officials. If required by law, we may disclose your personal
information in accordance with a court order or at the request of government regulators.
Only that information required by law, subpoena, or court order will be disclosed. |
34
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
June 11, 2009
INTERNET -Access www.voteproxy.com and follow the on-screen instructions. Have your proxy card
available when you access the web page, and use the Company Number and Account Number shown on your
proxy card.
TELEPHONE -Call toll-free 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437) in the United States or 1-718-921-8500
from foreign countries from any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. Have your proxy
card available when you call and use the Company Number and Account Number shown on your proxy
card.
Vote online/phone until 11:59 PM EST the day before the meeting.
MAIL -Sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.
IN PERSON -You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.
COMPANY NUMBER
ACCOUNT NUMBER
20630300000000000000 0 061109
1. Election of Directors: O Michael Appling, Jr. O Joseph E. Canon O Arthur L. French O William D.
Gutermuth O Vincent D. Foster O Todd A. Reppert FOR ALL NOMINEES WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL
NOMINEES FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below) INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for
any individual nominee(s), mark FOR ALL EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each nominee you
wish to withhold, as shown here: NOMINEES: 2. 3. 4.
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address
in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may
not be submitted via this method.
Signature of Stockholder
Date:
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Proposal to authorize us, with the approval of our Board of Directors, to sell shares of our common
stock during the next twelve months at a price below our then current net asset value per share.
Proposal to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton, LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009.
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly
come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, including procedural matters and matters
relating to the conduct of the meeting.
Signature of Stockholder Date:
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly,
each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian,
please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by
duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in
partnership name by authorized person. |
0
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON HELD ON JUNE 11, 2009 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON
BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
As an alternative to completing this form, you may enter your vote instruction by telephone at
1-800-PROXIES, or via the Internet at WWW.VOTEPROXY.COM and follow the simple instructions. Use the
Company Number and Account Number shown on your proxy card.
The undersigned hereby appoints Vincent D. Foster and Jason B. Beauvais as proxies, each with full
power of substitution, to represent and vote as designated on the reverse side, all the shares of
Common Stock of Main Street Capital Corporation held of record by the undersigned on April 15,
2009, at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders to be held at 1330 Post Oak Boulevard, First Floor
Auditorium, Houston, Texas, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Main Street Capitals Annual Report for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the Notice of 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and related Proxy
Statement.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed herein. If no direction is made,
this proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3. The proxy holders named above also will vote in
their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournment thereof, including procedural matters and matters relating to the conduct of the
meeting.
You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes on the reverse side.
The proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card or vote by telephone or
Internet as described below before the Annual Meeting.
Voting by telephone or Internet eliminates the need to return this proxy card. Your vote
authorizes the proxies named on the reverse side to vote your shares to the same extent as if you
had marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy card. Before voting, read the Proxy Statement and
Proxy Voting Instructions.
Thank you for voting.
(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)
14475 |