UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from: to
Commission File Number: 1-33723
Main Street Capital Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
41-2230745 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800 |
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
77056 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(713) 350-6000
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
n/a
(Former name former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock as of May 13, 2008 was 8,959,718.
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (cost: $55,000,187 and $43,053,372 as of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
$ |
61,063,818 |
|
|
$ |
48,108,197 |
|
Affiliate investments (cost: $33,891,189 and $33,037,053 as of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
36,595,287 |
|
|
|
36,176,216 |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments (cost: $7,034,396 and $3,381,001 as of March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
7,394,396 |
|
|
|
3,741,001 |
|
Investment in affiliated Investment Manager (cost: $18,000,000 as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007) |
|
|
17,395,271 |
|
|
|
17,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments (cost: $113,925,772 and $97,471,426 as of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
122,448,772 |
|
|
|
105,650,414 |
|
Idle funds investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,063,261 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
73,954,307 |
|
|
|
41,889,324 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,045,472 |
|
|
|
1,574,888 |
|
Deferred financing costs (net of accumulated amortization of $577,892 and $529,952 as
of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
1,638,590 |
|
|
|
1,670,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
199,087,141 |
|
|
$ |
174,848,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBIC debentures |
|
$ |
55,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
55,000,000 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
3,151,223 |
|
|
|
3,025,672 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
312,072 |
|
|
|
1,062,672 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
318,306 |
|
|
|
610,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
83,781,601 |
|
|
|
59,698,814 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share (150,000,000 shares authorized and
8,959,718 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007) |
|
|
89,597 |
|
|
|
89,597 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
104,076,033 |
|
|
|
104,076,033 |
|
Undistributed net realized earnings |
|
|
6,136,139 |
|
|
|
6,067,131 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments, net of income taxes |
|
|
5,003,771 |
|
|
|
4,916,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets |
|
|
115,305,540 |
|
|
|
115,149,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and net assets |
|
$ |
199,087,141 |
|
|
$ |
174,848,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
|
$ |
12.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, fee and dividend income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments |
|
$ |
1,906,902 |
|
|
$ |
1,123,953 |
|
Affiliate investments |
|
|
1,064,961 |
|
|
|
931,165 |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments |
|
|
433,367 |
|
|
|
198,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest, fee and dividend income |
|
|
3,405,230 |
|
|
|
2,253,468 |
|
Interest from idle funds and other |
|
|
622,136 |
|
|
|
159,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income |
|
|
4,027,366 |
|
|
|
2,412,577 |
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees to affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499,979 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
(844,407 |
) |
|
|
(706,654 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(678,897 |
) |
|
|
(35,765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
(1,523,304 |
) |
|
|
(1,242,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
2,504,062 |
|
|
|
1,170,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) FROM INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
611,250 |
|
Affiliate investments |
|
|
611,250 |
|
|
|
406,179 |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized gain from investments |
|
|
611,250 |
|
|
|
746,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET REALIZED INCOME |
|
|
3,115,312 |
|
|
|
1,917,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN UNREALIZED APPRECIATION
(DEPRECIATION) FROM INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments |
|
|
1,071,109 |
|
|
|
(661,250 |
) |
Affiliate investments |
|
|
(497,368 |
) |
|
|
213,821 |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,833 |
|
Investment in affiliated Investment Manager |
|
|
(229,729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) from
investments |
|
|
344,012 |
|
|
|
(137,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(256,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM
OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
3,202,636 |
|
|
$ |
1,779,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME PER COMMON SHARE-BASIC AND
DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET REALIZED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE-BASIC AND
DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS/DISTRIBUTIONS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM
OPERATIONS PER COMMON SHARE-BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
OUTSTANDING-BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
|
8,526,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members |
|
|
Limited |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Undistributed |
|
|
Investments, |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Partners |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid In |
|
|
Net Realized |
|
|
net of |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(General Partner) |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
181,770 |
|
|
$ |
25,239,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,266,043 |
|
|
$ |
13,585,479 |
|
|
$ |
43,272,531 |
|
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,827 |
|
Distributions to partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,600,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,600,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase resulting from
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,917,070 |
|
|
|
(137,596 |
) |
|
|
1,779,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
181,770 |
|
|
$ |
25,277,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,583,113 |
|
|
$ |
13,447,883 |
|
|
$ |
41,489,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
$ |
89,597 |
|
|
$ |
104,076,033 |
|
|
$ |
6,067,131 |
|
|
$ |
4,916,447 |
|
|
$ |
115,149,208 |
|
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,046,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,046,304 |
) |
|
Net increase resulting from
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,115,312 |
|
|
|
87,324 |
|
|
|
3,202,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
$ |
89,597 |
|
|
$ |
104,076,033 |
|
|
$ |
6,136,139 |
|
|
$ |
5,033,771 |
|
|
$ |
115,305,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations: |
|
$ |
3,202,636 |
|
|
$ |
1,779,474 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from
operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of unearned income |
|
|
(363,146 |
) |
|
|
(205,375 |
) |
Net payment-in-kind interest accrual |
|
|
(151,792 |
) |
|
|
(73,094 |
) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
47,940 |
|
|
|
42,288 |
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments |
|
|
(344,012 |
) |
|
|
137,596 |
|
Net realized gain from investments |
|
|
(611,250 |
) |
|
|
(746,891 |
) |
Changes in other assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
146,698 |
|
|
|
58,709 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
219,933 |
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
125,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable |
|
|
(750,600 |
) |
|
|
(630,891 |
) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(292,164 |
) |
|
|
(37,475 |
) |
Deferred debt origination fees received |
|
|
252,166 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,481,960 |
|
|
|
375,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in portfolio companies |
|
|
(18,076,602 |
) |
|
|
(3,086,198 |
) |
Principal payments received on loans and debt securities |
|
|
1,954,408 |
|
|
|
1,557,470 |
|
Proceeds from sale of equity securities and related notes |
|
|
704,654 |
|
|
|
1,127,250 |
|
Proceeds from idle funds investments |
|
|
24,063,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investment activities |
|
|
8,654,721 |
|
|
|
(401,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,827 |
|
Distribution to members and partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,600,000 |
) |
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
|
(3,046,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of SBIC debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,900,000 |
|
Proceeds from line of credit |
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of deferred loan costs and SBIC debenture fees |
|
|
(16,394 |
) |
|
|
(240,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
21,937,302 |
|
|
|
6,097,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
32,064,983 |
|
|
|
6,071,925 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
41,889,324 |
|
|
|
13,768,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
73,954,307 |
|
|
$ |
19,840,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Control Investments (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Café Brazil, LLC |
|
Casual Restaurant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity April 20, 2009) |
|
Group |
|
$ |
2,750,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,711,156 |
|
|
$ |
2,734,866 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 42.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,837 |
|
|
|
1,085,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,752,993 |
|
|
|
3,819,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBT Nuggets, LLC |
|
Produces and Sells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2011) |
|
IT Certification |
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
236,670 |
|
|
|
239,970 |
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2011) |
|
Training Videos |
|
|
1,860,000 |
|
|
|
1,808,398 |
|
|
|
1,860,000 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 29.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,000 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 10.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,549,068 |
|
|
|
3,644,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Manufacturing, LLC |
|
Industrial Metal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity August 31, 2012) |
|
Fabrication |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,189,126 |
|
|
|
1,189,126 |
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity August 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,816,433 |
|
|
|
1,816,433 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 18.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
|
|
1,020,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 8.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,637,559 |
|
|
|
4,575,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawthorne Customs & Dispatch Services, LLC |
|
Transportation/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity January 31, 2011) |
|
Logistics |
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
1,307,699 |
|
|
|
1,307,699 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 27.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
435,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 16.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,720,199 |
|
|
|
1,972,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hayden Acquisition, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity March 9, 2009) |
|
Utility Structures |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,760,281 |
|
|
|
1,760,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydratec Holdings, LLC
12.5% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2012) |
|
Agricultural Services |
|
|
5,700,000 |
|
|
|
5,592,935 |
|
|
|
5,592,935 |
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
1,295,244 |
|
|
|
1,276,911 |
|
|
|
1,276,911 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 60%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,669,846 |
|
|
|
8,669,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, LLC |
|
Retail Jewelry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity November 14, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,181,550 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
13% current / 6% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity November 14, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
1,085,759 |
|
|
|
1,061,656 |
|
|
|
1,085,759 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 25.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,000 |
|
|
|
815,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,619,206 |
|
|
|
3,100,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magna Card, Inc. |
|
Wholesale/Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% current / 0.4% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity September 30, 2010) |
|
Magnetic Products |
|
|
2,021,079 |
|
|
|
1,979,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 35.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,079,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAPCO Precast, LLC |
|
Precast Concrete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18% Secured Debt (Maturity January 31, 2013) |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
7,000,000 |
|
|
|
6,863,678 |
|
|
|
6,863,678 |
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity January 31, 2013) |
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,961,058 |
|
|
|
3,961,058 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 36.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,824,736 |
|
|
|
14,999,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quest Design & Production, LLC |
|
Design and Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity December 31, 2010) |
|
of Custom Display Systems |
|
|
4,067,700 |
|
|
|
4,060,918 |
|
|
|
3,020,918 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 26.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100,918 |
|
|
|
3,020,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA Acquisition Group, LP |
|
Processor of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity July 29, 2010) |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,650,000 |
|
|
|
1,604,525 |
|
|
|
1,650,000 |
|
Partnership Interest (7) (Fully diluted 18.3%) |
|
Aggregates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,500 |
|
|
|
3,435,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 18.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
3,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,044,525 |
|
|
|
8,535,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Scaffolding & Equipment, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity August 16, 2012) |
|
Scaffolding and |
|
|
1,062,208 |
|
|
|
1,052,640 |
|
|
|
1,052,640 |
|
13% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity August 16, 2012) |
|
Shoring Equipment |
|
|
3,236,945 |
|
|
|
3,178,920 |
|
|
|
3,178,920 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 18.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
992,063 |
|
|
|
1,025,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,223,623 |
|
|
|
5,256,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uvalco Supply, LLC |
|
Farm and Ranch Supply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 37.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787,500 |
|
|
|
787,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wicks N More, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity April 26, 2011) |
|
High-end Candles |
|
|
3,720,000 |
|
|
|
3,552,124 |
|
|
|
832,124 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity March 31, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
Prime Secured Debt (Maturity February 8, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 11.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 21.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,230,124 |
|
|
|
920,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Control Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000,187 |
|
|
|
61,063,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Affiliate Investments (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Millwork Company, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/Distributor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity February 5, 2012) |
|
of Wood Doors |
|
|
2,866,667 |
|
|
|
2,744,125 |
|
|
|
2,744,125 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 11.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,464 |
|
|
|
92,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,836,589 |
|
|
|
2,836,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Sensor Technologies, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 0.5% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2010) |
|
Commercial/ |
|
|
3,600,000 |
|
|
|
3,600,000 |
|
|
|
3,600,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 20.0%) |
|
Industrial Sensors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,650,000 |
|
|
|
4,350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlton Global Resources, LLC |
|
Processor of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity November 15, 2011) |
|
Industrial Minerals |
|
|
4,791,944 |
|
|
|
4,655,836 |
|
|
|
1,577,348 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 8.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,055,836 |
|
|
|
1,577,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston Plating & Coatings, LLC |
|
Plating & Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity July 19, 2011) |
|
Coating Services |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 11.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
2,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,000 |
|
|
|
2,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KBK Industries, LLC |
|
Specialty Manufacturer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity January 23, 2011) |
|
of Oilfield and |
|
|
3,937,500 |
|
|
|
3,744,312 |
|
|
|
3,937,501 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity July 1, 2009) |
|
Industrial Products |
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity March 31, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 14.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,131,812 |
|
|
|
5,837,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurus Healthcare, LP |
|
Healthcare Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity May 7, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
3,010,000 |
|
|
|
2,947,710 |
|
|
|
3,010,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 18.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,052,710 |
|
|
|
3,910,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Trench Safety, LLC |
|
Trench & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% PIK Debt (Maturity April 16, 2014) |
|
Safety Equipment |
|
|
374,647 |
|
|
|
332,366 |
|
|
|
332,366 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 10.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124,674 |
|
|
|
2,124,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulse Systems, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2009) |
|
Components for |
|
|
2,215,714 |
|
|
|
2,177,817 |
|
|
|
2,215,714 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 6.6%) |
|
Medical Devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,295,817 |
|
|
|
2,565,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation General, Inc. |
|
Taxi Cab/Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2010) |
|
Services |
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,413,158 |
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 24.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,483,158 |
|
|
|
3,840,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Air Systems, Ltd. |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity October 11, 2011) |
|
Chilling Systems |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
910,077 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vision Interests, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
Installer of Commercial |
|
|
3,760,000 |
|
|
|
3,550,543 |
|
|
|
3,550,543 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 8.9%) |
|
Signage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,000 |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 11.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,082,543 |
|
|
|
4,770,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WorldCall, Inc. |
|
Telecommunication/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity October 22, 2009) |
|
Information Services |
|
|
745,000 |
|
|
|
713,800 |
|
|
|
731,355 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 6.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,173 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 13.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
246,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957,973 |
|
|
|
1,157,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,891,189 |
|
|
|
36,595,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(5): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Teak Fine Hardwoods, Inc. |
|
Hardwood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Current/5.5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity April 13, 2011) |
|
Products |
|
|
1,151,866 |
|
|
|
1,136,642 |
|
|
|
1,136,642 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 3.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
490,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,266,642 |
|
|
|
1,626,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support Systems Homes, Inc. |
|
Manages Substance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Current/4% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
Abuse Treatment Centers |
|
|
1,541,152 |
|
|
|
1,523.737 |
|
|
|
1,523,737 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
158,888 |
|
|
|
157,100 |
|
|
|
157,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,680,837 |
|
|
|
1,680,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Innovations, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of Specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5% Secured Debt (Maturity January 15, 2015) |
|
Cutting Tools and Punches |
|
|
4,150,000 |
|
|
|
4,086,917 |
|
|
|
4,086,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Non-Control/Non- Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,034,396 |
|
|
|
7,394,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (Investment Manager) |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% of Membership Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
17,395,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
113,925,772 |
|
|
$ |
122,448,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Equity and warrants are non-income producing,
unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See footnote C for summary geographic location of portfolio companies. |
|
(3) |
|
Controlled investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (1940
Act), as investments in which more than 25% of the voting securities are owned or where greater than 50% of the board
representation is maintained. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate investments are defined by the 1940 Act as those Non-Control investments in which
between 5% and 25% of the voting securities are owned. |
|
(5) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are
neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments. |
|
(6) |
|
Net of prepayments and accumulated unearned income. |
|
(7) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
9
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Control Investments (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Café Brazil, LLC |
|
Casual Restaurant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity April 20, 2009) |
|
Group |
|
$ |
2,750,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,702,931 |
|
|
$ |
2,702,931 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 42.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,837 |
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,744,768 |
|
|
|
3,952,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBT Nuggets, LLC |
|
Produces and Sells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2011) |
|
IT Certification |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
354,678 |
|
|
|
354,678 |
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2011) |
|
Training Videos |
|
|
1,860,000 |
|
|
|
1,805,275 |
|
|
|
1,805,275 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 29.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,000 |
|
|
|
1,145,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 10.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,663,953 |
|
|
|
3,649,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Manufacturing, LLC |
|
Industrial Metal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity August 31, 2012) |
|
Fabrication |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,188,636 |
|
|
|
1,188,636 |
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity August 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,809,216 |
|
|
|
1,809,216 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 18.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 8.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,629,852 |
|
|
|
3,719,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawthorne Customs & Dispatch Services, LLC |
|
Transportation/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity January 31, 2011) |
|
Logistics |
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
1,304,693 |
|
|
|
1,304,693 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 27.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
435,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 16.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,717,193 |
|
|
|
1,969,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hayden Acquisition, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity March 9, 2009) |
|
Utility Structures |
|
|
1,955,000 |
|
|
|
1,901,040 |
|
|
|
1,901,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydratec Holdings, LLC |
|
Agricultural Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
5,700,000 |
|
|
|
5,588,729 |
|
|
|
5,588,729 |
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
1,845,244 |
|
|
|
1,825,911 |
|
|
|
1,825,911 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 60%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,214,640 |
|
|
|
9,214,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, LLC |
|
Retail Jewelry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity November 14, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,180,509 |
|
|
|
1,180,509 |
|
13% current / 6% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity November 14, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
1,069,457 |
|
|
|
1,044,190 |
|
|
|
1,044,190 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 25.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,000 |
|
|
|
815,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600,699 |
|
|
|
3,039,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magna Card, Inc. |
|
Wholesale/Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% current / 0.4% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity September 30, 2010) |
|
Magnetic Products |
|
|
2,021,079 |
|
|
|
1,958,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 35.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,058,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quest Design & Production, LLC |
|
Design and Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity December 1, 2010) |
|
of Custom Display |
|
|
3,991,542 |
|
|
|
3,964,853 |
|
|
|
3,964,853 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 26.0%) |
|
Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,004,853 |
|
|
|
4,004,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA Acquisition Group, LP |
|
Processor of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity July 29, 2010) |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,870,000 |
|
|
|
1,813,789 |
|
|
|
1,813,789 |
|
Partnership Interest (7) (Fully diluted 18.3%) |
|
Aggregates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,500 |
|
|
|
3,435,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 18.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
3,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,253,789 |
|
|
|
8,698,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Innovations, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2009) |
|
Specialty Cutting |
|
|
787,500 |
|
|
|
748,716 |
|
|
|
748,716 |
|
Prime Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2009) |
|
Tools and Punches |
|
|
262,500 |
|
|
|
249,572 |
|
|
|
249,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998,288 |
|
|
|
998,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Scaffolding & Equipment, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity August 16, 2012) |
|
Scaffolding and |
|
|
1,122,333 |
|
|
|
1,111,741 |
|
|
|
1,111,741 |
|
13% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity August 16, 2012) |
|
Shoring Equipment |
|
|
3,196,376 |
|
|
|
3,136,274 |
|
|
|
3,136,274 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 18.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
992,063 |
|
|
|
1,025,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,240,078 |
|
|
|
5,273,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wicks N More, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity April 26, 2011) |
|
High-end Candles |
|
|
3,720,000 |
|
|
|
3,455,444 |
|
|
|
1,685,444 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 11.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 21.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,025,444 |
|
|
|
1,685,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Control Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,053,372 |
|
|
|
48,108,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Affiliate Investments (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Millwork Company, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/Distributor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity February 5, 2012) |
|
of Wood Doors |
|
|
2,666,667 |
|
|
|
2,547,510 |
|
|
|
2,547,510 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 10.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,120 |
|
|
|
87,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,634,630 |
|
|
|
2,634,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Sensor Technologies, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 0.5% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2010) |
|
Commercial/ |
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,404,755 |
|
|
|
3,404,755 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 20.0%) |
|
Industrial Sensors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,454,755 |
|
|
|
4,154,755 |
|
|
Carlton Global Resources, LLC |
|
Processor of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity November 15, 2011) |
|
Industrial Minerals |
|
|
4,687,777 |
|
|
|
4,555,835 |
|
|
|
2,618,421 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 8.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,955,835 |
|
|
|
2,618,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston Plating & Coatings, LLC |
|
Plating & Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity July 19, 2011) |
|
Coating Services |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 11.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
2,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,000 |
|
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KBK Industries, LLC |
|
Specialty Manufacturer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity January 23, 2011) |
|
of Oilfield and |
|
|
3,937,500 |
|
|
|
3,730,881 |
|
|
|
3,730,881 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity July 1, 2009) |
|
Industrial Products |
|
|
623,063 |
|
|
|
623,063 |
|
|
|
623,063 |
|
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity January 31, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
686,250 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 14.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,616,444 |
|
|
|
5,740,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurus Healthcare, LP |
|
Healthcare Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity May 7, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
3,010,000 |
|
|
|
2,934,625 |
|
|
|
2,934,625 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 18.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,039,625 |
|
|
|
3,649,625 |
|
|
National Trench Safety, LLC |
|
Trench & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% PIK Debt (Maturity April 16, 2014) |
|
Safety Equipment |
|
|
365,334 |
|
|
|
314,805 |
|
|
|
314,805 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 10.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,107,113 |
|
|
|
2,107,113 |
|
|
Pulse Systems, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2009) |
|
Components for |
|
|
2,307,498 |
|
|
|
2,260,420 |
|
|
|
2,260,420 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 6.6%) |
|
Medical Devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,378,420 |
|
|
|
2,610,420 |
|
|
Transportation General, Inc. |
|
Taxi Cab/Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2010) |
|
Services |
|
|
3,600,000 |
|
|
|
3,501,966 |
|
|
|
3,501,966 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 24.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,571,966 |
|
|
|
3,841,966 |
|
|
Turbine Air Systems, Ltd. |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity October 11, 2011) |
|
Chilling Systems |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
905,213 |
|
|
|
905,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vision Interests, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
Installer of Commercial |
|
|
3,760,000 |
|
|
|
3,541,662 |
|
|
|
3,541,662 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 8.9%) |
|
Signage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,000 |
|
|
|
372,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 11.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,073,662 |
|
|
|
4,288,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WorldCall, Inc. |
|
Telecommunication/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity October 22, 2009) |
|
Information Services |
|
|
782,500 |
|
|
|
745,217 |
|
|
|
745,217 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 6.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,173 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 13.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
989,390 |
|
|
|
1,075,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,037,053 |
|
|
|
36,176,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(5): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Teak Fine Hardwoods, Inc. |
|
Hardwood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Current/5.5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity April 13, 2011) |
|
Products |
|
|
1,651,028 |
|
|
|
1,586,391 |
|
|
|
1,586,391 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 3.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
490,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,391 |
|
|
|
2,076,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support Systems Homes, Inc. |
|
Manages Substance Abuse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Current/4% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
Treatment Centers |
|
|
1,525,674 |
|
|
|
1,507,596 |
|
|
|
1,507,596 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
158,888 |
|
|
|
157,014 |
|
|
|
157,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,664,610 |
|
|
|
1,664,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Non-Control/Non- Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,381,001 |
|
|
|
3,741,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (Investment Manager) |
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% of Membership Interests |
|
Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
17,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97,471,426 |
|
|
$ |
105,650,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idle Fund Investments |
|
Investments in U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.691% Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note |
|
Agency Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Maturity April 11, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,421,791 |
|
|
$ |
3,421,791 |
|
4.691% Federal National Mortgage Association Discount Note
(Maturity April 2, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,425,490 |
|
|
|
3,425,490 |
|
4.675% Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note
(Maturity March 20, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,431,089 |
|
|
|
3,431,089 |
|
4.668% Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note
(Maturity March 5, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,437,408 |
|
|
|
3,437,408 |
|
4.673% Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note
(Maturity February 20, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,443,197 |
|
|
|
3,443,197 |
|
4.77% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Discount Note
(Maturity February 7, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,448,948 |
|
|
|
3,448,948 |
|
4.64% Federal National Mortgage Association Discount Note
(Maturity January 23, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,455,338 |
|
|
|
3,455,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Idle Fund Investments, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,063,261 |
|
|
$ |
24,063,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Equity and warrants are non-income producing,
unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See footnote C for summary geographic location of portfolio companies. |
|
(3) |
|
Controlled investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (1940
Act), as investments in which more than 25% of the voting securities are owned or where greater than 50% of the board
representation is maintained. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate investments are defined by the 1940 Act as those Non-Control investments in which
between 5% and 25% of the voting securities are owned. |
|
(5) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are
neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments. |
|
(6) |
|
Net of prepayments and accumulated unearned income. |
|
(7) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
12
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE A ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
1. Organization
Main Street Capital Corporation (MSCC) was formed on March 9, 2007 for the purpose of (i)
acquiring 100% of the equity interests of Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP (the Fund) and its
general partner, Main Street Mezzanine Management, LLC (the General Partner), (ii) acquiring 100%
of the equity interests of Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (the Investment Manager), (iii)
raising capital in an initial public offering, which was completed in October 2007 (the
Offering), and (iv) thereafter operating as an internally managed business development company
(BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The transactions
discussed above were consummated in October 2007 and are collectively termed the Formation
Transactions. The term Main Street refers to the Fund plus the General Partner prior to the
Offering and to MSCC and its subsidiaries, including the Fund and the General Partner, after the
Offering.
Immediately following the Formation Transactions, Main Street Equity Interests, Inc. (MSEI)
was created as a wholly owned consolidated subsidiary of MSCC. MSEI has elected for tax purposes to
be treated as a taxable entity and is taxed at normal corporate tax rates based on its taxable
income.
2. Basis of Presentation
Main Streets financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the
consolidated financial statements of Main Street include the accounts of MSCC, the Fund, MSEI and
the General Partner. The Formation Transactions involved an exchange of equity interests between
companies under common control. In accordance with the guidance on exchanges of equity interests
between entities under common control contained in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), Main Streets results of operations and cash
flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are presented as if the Formation Transactions had
occurred as of January 1, 2007. Main Streets financial position as of March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007 is presented on a consolidated basis. The effects of all intercompany transactions between
Main Street and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. As a result of adopting the
provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, in the first quarter of 2008, certain
reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform with the current financial
statement presentation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Main Street are presented in
conformity with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for
reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures
accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP are omitted. In the
opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial results included herein contain all
adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for the fair
presentation of financial statements for the interim periods included herein. The results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results to be expected for the full year. Also, the unaudited financial statements and
notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the
period ended December 31, 2007. Financial statements prepared on a U.S. GAAP basis require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and disclosures reported in
the financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the
future as more information becomes known, which could impact the amounts reported and disclosed
herein.
Under the investment company rules and regulations pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation S-X and
the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies issued by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (the AICPA Guide), Main Street is precluded from consolidating
portfolio company investments, including those in which it has a controlling interest, unless the
portfolio company is another investment company. An exception to this general principle in the
AICPA Guide occurs if Main Street owns a controlled operating company that provides all or
substantially all of its services directly to Main Street or to an investment company of Main
Street. None of the investments made by Main Street qualify for this exception. Therefore, Main
Streets portfolio investments are carried on the balance sheet at fair value, as discussed further
in Note B, with any adjustments to fair value recognized as Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation
(Depreciation) from Investments on the Statement of Operations until the investment is disposed of
resulting in any gain or loss on exit being recognized as a Net Realized Gain (Loss) from
Investments.
13
Portfolio Investment Classification
Main Street classifies its portfolio investments in accordance with the requirements of the
1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, Control Investments are defined as investments in which Main Street
owns more than 25% of the voting securities or has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board
representation. Under the 1940 Act, Affiliate Investments are defined as those Non-Control
Investments in which Main Street owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940
Act, Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined as investments that are neither Control
Investments nor Affiliate Investments. The Investment in affiliated Investment Manager represents
Main Streets investment in a wholly owned investment manager subsidiary that is accounted for as a
portfolio investment of Main Street.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1. Valuation of Investments
Main Street accounts for its portfolio investments at fair value. As a result, Main Street
adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), in the first quarter
of 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes
a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances
disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 157, Main Street
reported unearned income as a single line item on the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated
schedule of investments. This change in presentation had no impact on the overall net cost or fair
value of Main Streets investment portfolio and had no impact on Main Streets financial position
or results of operations.
Main Streets business plan calls for it to invest primarily in illiquid securities issued by
private companies and/or thinly-traded public companies. These investments may be subject to
restrictions on resale and generally have no established trading market. As a result, Main Street
determines in good faith the fair value of its portfolio investments pursuant to a valuation policy
and a valuation process approved by its Board of Directors and in accordance with SFAS 157. Under
SFAS 157, Main Street principally utilizes the market approach to estimate the fair value of its
warrant and equity investments and the income approach to estimate the fair value of its debt
investments. Under the market approach, Main Street estimates the enterprise value of the portfolio
companies in which it invests. The enterprise value is the fair value at which an enterprise could
be sold in a transaction between two willing parties, other than through a forced or liquidation
sale. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before income
taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited
cases, book value. There is no single methodology for estimating enterprise value. For any one
portfolio company, enterprise value is generally described as a range of values from which a single
estimate of enterprise value is derived. In estimating the enterprise value of a portfolio company,
Main Street analyzes various factors, including the portfolio companys historical and projected
financial results. Under the income approach, Main Street generally prepares and analyzes
discounted cash flow models based on its projections of the future free cash flows of the business
and company specific capital costs. Yield-to-maturity models are also used to present value the
future cash flow streams of Main Streets debt investments.
For investments where Main Street has control or could gain control
through an option or warrant security, the enterprise value
methodology is also considered for estimating the fair value of debt
investments.
Main Street reviews external events,
including private mergers and acquisitions involving comparable companies, and includes these
events in the valuation process.
Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, Main Streets estimate of fair value
may differ materially from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the
securities existed. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur
over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these
investments to be different than the valuations currently assigned. Main Street determines the fair
value of each individual investment and records changes in fair value as unrealized appreciation or
depreciation.
Main Street uses a standard investment ranking system in connection with its investment
oversight, portfolio management/analysis and investment valuation procedures. This system takes
into account both quantitative and qualitative factors of the portfolio company and the investments
held. Each quarter, Main Street estimates the fair value of each portfolio investment, and the
Board of Directors of Main Street oversees, reviews and approves, in good faith, Main Streets fair
value estimates.
Duff & Phelps, LLC, an independent valuation firm (Duff & Phelps), provided third party
valuation consulting services to Main Street which consisted of certain mutually agreed limited
procedures that Main Street identified and requested Duff & Phelps to perform (hereinafter referred
to as the Procedures). During 2007, Main Street asked Duff & Phelps to perform the Procedures, at
each quarter end, on a total of 24 portfolio companies comprising approximately 77% of the total
portfolio investments at fair value as of December 31, 2007. The Procedures were performed on
investments in 6 portfolio companies for each quarter ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and
September 30, 2007. For the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Procedures were performed on
investments in 5 portfolio companies. In addition, the Procedures were performed on the investment
in the Investment Manager. For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Procedures were performed on
investments in 5 portfolio companies comprising approximately
16% of the total portfolio investments at fair value as of March 31, 2008. Upon completion of
the Procedures in each case, Duff & Phelps concluded that the fair value, as determined by Main
Street, of those investments subjected to the Procedures did not appear to be unreasonable. The
Board of Directors of Main Street is ultimately and solely responsible for overseeing, reviewing
and approving, in good faith, Main Streets estimate of the fair value for the investments.
14
Main Street believes its Investments as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 approximate
fair value based on the market in which Main Street operates and other conditions in existence at
these reporting periods.
2. Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and dividend income is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that amounts are
expected to be collected. In accordance with Main Streets valuation policy, accrued interest is
evaluated periodically for collectibility. When a loan or debt security becomes 90 days or more
past due, and if Main Street otherwise does not expect the debtor to be able to service all of its
debt or other obligations, Main Street will generally place the loan or debt security on
non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest income on that loan or debt security until the
borrower has demonstrated the ability and intent to pay contractual amounts due. If a loan or debt
securitys status significantly improves regarding ability to service the debt or other
obligations, or if a loan or debt security is fully impaired, it will be removed from non-accrual
status. Dividend income is recorded as dividends are declared or at the point an obligation exists
for the portfolio company to make a distribution.
Main Street holds debt instruments in its portfolio that contain payment-in-kind (PIK)
interest provisions. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each debt
agreement, is added to the principal balance of the debt and is recorded as interest income. Thus,
the actual collection of this interest may be deferred until the time of debt principal repayment.
As of March 31, 2008, Main Street had two investments on non-accrual status. These investments
comprised approximately 2.4% of the total portfolio investments at fair value as of March 31, 2008
(excluding Main Streets investment in the Investment Manager). As of December 31, 2007, Main
Street had one investment that was on non-accrual status. This investment comprised approximately
3.1% of the total portfolio investments at fair value as of December 31, 2007 (excluding Main
Streets investment in the Investment Manager).
3. Fee Income Structuring and Advisory Services
Main Street may periodically provide services, including structuring and advisory services, to
its portfolio companies. For services that are separately identifiable and evidence exists to
substantiate fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally when the investment
transaction closes. Fees received in connection with debt financing transactions for services that
do not meet these criteria are treated as debt origination fees and are accreted into interest
income over the life of the financing.
4. Unearned Income Debt Origination Fees and Original Issue Discount
Main Street capitalizes upfront debt origination fees received in connection with financings
and reflects such fees as unearned income netted against Investments on the balance sheets. The
unearned income from such fees is accreted into interest income based on the effective interest
method over the life of the financing. In connection with its debt investments, Main Street
sometimes receives nominal cost warrants (nominal cost equity) that are valued as part of the
negotiation process with the particular portfolio company. When Main Street receives nominal cost
equity, Main Street allocates its cost basis in its investment between its debt securities and its
nominal cost equity at the time of origination. Any resulting discount from recording the debt is
reflected as unearned income, which is netted against the Investment and accreted into interest
income over the life of the debt.
5. Income Taxes
Main Street intends to qualify and elect for the tax treatment applicable to regulated
investment companies (RIC) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code), and, among other things, intends to make the required distributions to its
stockholders as specified therein. In order to qualify as a RIC, Main Street is required to timely
distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income, as defined by the
Code, each year. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, Main Street may
choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax
year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed
through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which
generated such taxable income.
15
MSCCs wholly owned subsidiary, MSEI, is a taxable entity which holds certain portfolio
investments of Main Street. MSEI is consolidated with Main Street, and the portfolio investments
held by MSEI are included in Main Streets consolidated financial statements. The purpose of MSEI
is to permit Main Street to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which are pass through
entities for tax purposes in order to comply with the source income requirements contained in the
RIC tax provisions of the Code. MSEI is not consolidated with Main Street for income tax purposes
and may generate income tax expense as a result of its ownership of certain portfolio investments.
This income tax expense, if any, is reflected in Main Streets Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
MSEI uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities
and their reported amounts in the financial statements, using statutory tax rates in effect for the
year in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided
against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Prior to the Formation Transactions, Main Street was taxed under the partnership provisions of
the Code. Under these provisions of the Code, the General Partner and limited partners were
responsible for reporting their share of the partnerships income or loss on their income tax
returns.
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to
temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses. Taxable income
generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, as investment gains or losses are
not included in taxable income until they are realized.
6. Net Realized Gains or Losses from Investments and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or
Depreciation from Investments
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the sale
or redemption of an investment and the cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized
appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments written-off during the
period net of recoveries. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation from investments
reflects the net change in the valuation of the investment portfolio pursuant to Main Streets
valuation guidelines and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized appreciation or
depreciation on exited investments.
7. Concentration of Credit Risks
Main Street places its cash in financial institutions, and, at times, such balances may be in
excess of the federally insured limit.
8. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. This statement addresses how to calculate fair value measurements required
or permitted under other accounting pronouncements. Accordingly, this statement does not require
any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this statement will
change current practice. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. Main Street adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 in the first
quarter of 2008. With the adoption of this statement, Main Street incorporated the income approach
to estimate the fair value of its debt investments principally using a yield-to-maturity model,
resulting in the recognition of $654,335 in unrealized appreciation from ten debt investments.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159), which provides
companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The
objective of SFAS 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the
volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS 159
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between
companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities
and to more easily understand the effect of the companys choice to use fair value on its earnings.
SFAS 159 also requires entities to display the fair value of the selected assets and liabilities on
the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other
accounting standards, including fair value measurement disclosures in SFAS 157. This Statement is
effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007.
Main Street adopted the provisions of SFAS 159 in the first quarter of 2008. Main Street did not
elect fair value measurement for assets or liabilities not already measured at fair value.
Therefore, the adoption of this statement did not have an impact on Main Streets consolidated
financial position or its results of operations.
16
NOTE C FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY AND PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
In connection with valuing portfolio investments, Main Street adopted the provisions of
SFAS 157 and SFAS 159 in the first quarter of 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of
inputs used to measure fair value, and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value
measurements. Main Street accounts for its portfolio investments at fair value.
Fair Value Hierarchy
In accordance with SFAS 157, Main Street has categorized its portfolio investments, based on
the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The
fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical
investments (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Portfolio investments recorded on Main Streets balance sheet are categorized based on the
inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1 Investments whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets
in an active market that Main Street has the ability to access (examples include investments in
active exchange-traded equity securities and investments in most U.S. government and agency
securities).
Level 2 Investments whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active
or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term
of the investment. Level 2 inputs include the following:
|
|
|
Quoted prices for similar assets in active markets (for example, investments in
restricted stock); |
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets (for example,
investments in thinly-traded public companies); |
|
|
|
|
Pricing models whose inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the
investment (for example, market interest rate indices); and |
|
|
|
|
Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from, or corroborated by,
observable market data through correlation or other means for substantially the full
term of the investment. |
Level 3 Investments whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require
inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These
inputs reflect managements own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in
pricing the investment (for example, investments in illiquid securities issued by private
companies).
As required by SFAS 157, when the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different
levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based
on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. For
example, a Level 3 fair value measurement may include inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and
2) and unobservable (Level 3). Therefore, gains and losses for such investments categorized within
the Level 3 table below may include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable
inputs (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Main Street conducts reviews of fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis.
Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification for certain
investments. As of March 31, 2008, all of Main Streets investment portfolio consisted of
investments in illiquid securities issued by private companies. The fair value determination for
these investments primarily consisted of unobservable inputs. As a result, all of Main Streets
portfolio investments were categorized as Level 3. The fair value determination of each portfolio
investment required one or more of the following unobservable inputs:
|
|
|
Financial information obtained from each portfolio company, including unaudited
statements of operations and balance sheets for the most recent period available as
compared to budgeted numbers; |
|
|
|
|
Current and projected financial condition of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Current and projected ability of the portfolio company to service its debt
obligations; |
|
|
|
|
Type and amount of collateral, if any, underlying the investment; |
|
|
|
|
Current financial ratios (e.g., fixed charge coverage ratio, interest coverage ratio,
net debt/EBITDA ratio) applicable to
the investment; |
17
|
|
|
Current liquidity of the investment and related financial ratios (e.g., current ratio
and quick ratio); |
|
|
|
|
Pending debt or capital restructuring of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Projected operating results of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Current information regarding any offers to purchase the investment; |
|
|
|
|
Current ability of the portfolio company to raise any additional financing as needed; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the economic environment which may have a material impact on the operating
results of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Internal occurrences that may have an impact (both positive and negative) on the
operating performance of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Qualitative assessment of key management; |
|
|
|
|
Contractual rights, obligations or restrictions associated with the investment; and |
|
|
|
|
Other factors deemed relevant. |
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of Main Streets Level 3
investments for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes from |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Type of |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Accretion of |
|
|
Redemptions/ |
|
|
New |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Investment |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unearned Income |
|
|
Repayments |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
to Realized |
|
|
(Depreciation) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Secured Debt |
|
$ |
64,581,986 |
|
|
$ |
357,802 |
|
|
$ |
(2,029,408 |
) |
|
$ |
15,333,109 |
|
|
$ |
(611,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,517,573 |
) |
|
$ |
75,114,666 |
|
Equity |
|
|
16,361,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751,000 |
|
|
|
17,899,808 |
|
Equity Warrant |
|
|
7,082,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,005,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,951,563 |
|
|
|
12,039,027 |
|
Investment Manager |
|
|
17,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229,729 |
) |
|
|
17,395,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
105,650,414 |
|
|
$ |
357,802 |
|
|
$ |
(2,029,408 |
) |
|
$ |
18,125,953 |
|
|
$ |
(611,250 |
) |
|
$ |
955,261 |
|
|
$ |
122,448,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Investments
Main Streets portfolio investments principally consist of secured debt, equity warrant and
direct equity investments in privately held companies. The debt investments are secured by either a
first or second lien on the assets of the portfolio company, generally bear interest at fixed
rates, and generally mature between five and seven years from original investment. Main Street also
receives nominally priced equity warrants and makes direct equity investments, usually in
connection with a debt investment in a portfolio company.
As discussed further in Note D, the Investment Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC.
However, the Investment Manager is accounted for as a portfolio investment of Main Street since it
conducts a significant portion of its investment management activities outside of MSCC or one of
its subsidiaries. To allow for more relevant disclosure of Main Streets core investment portfolio,
Main Streets investment in the Investment Manager has been excluded from the tables and amounts
set forth in this note.
Investment income, consisting of interest, dividends and fees, can fluctuate dramatically upon
repayment of a debt investment or sale of an equity interest. Revenue recognition in any given year
could be highly concentrated among several portfolio companies. For the three months ended March
31, 2008, Main Street recorded investment income from one portfolio company in excess of 10% of
total investment income. The investment income from that portfolio company represented
approximately 15% of the total investment income for the period, principally related to transaction
and structuring fees on the new investment in such company. For the three months ended March 31,
2007, Main Street did not record investment income from any portfolio company in excess of 10% of
total investment income.
As of March 31, 2008, Main Street had debt and equity investments in 29 portfolio companies
with an aggregate fair value of $105,053,501 and a weighted average effective yield on its debt
investments of 14.1%. As of December 31, 2007, Main Street had debt and equity investments in 27
portfolio companies with an aggregate fair value of $88,025,414 and a weighted average effective
yield on its debt investments of 14.3%. The weighted average yields were computed using the
effective interest rates for all debt investments at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
including amortization of deferred debt origination fees and accretion of original issue discount.
18
Summaries of the composition of Main Streets investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a
percentage of total portfolio investments are shown in following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
First lien debt |
|
|
82.2 |
% |
|
|
81.5 |
% |
Equity |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Second lien debt |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
First lien debt |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
|
|
70.1 |
% |
Equity |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Second lien debt |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the portfolio composition by geographic region of the United States
at cost and fair value as a percentage of total portfolio investments. The geographic composition
is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
31.9 |
% |
West |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
West |
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Streets portfolio investments are generally in lower middle-market companies in a
variety of industries. Set forth below are tables showing the composition of Main Streets
portfolio by industry at cost and fair value as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Precast concrete manufacturing |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Manufacturing |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Agricultural services |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Electronics manufacturing |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Mining and minerals |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Custom wood products |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Health care products |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Industrial equipment |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Transportation/logistics |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Health care services |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Metal fabrication |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Retail |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Equipment rental |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Infrastructure products |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Information services |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Industrial services |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Precast concrete manufacturing |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Mining and minerals |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Electronics manufacturing |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Agricultural services |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Health care products |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Custom wood products |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Transportation/logistics |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Health care services |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Industrial equipment |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Metal fabrication |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Retail |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Industrial services |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Equipment rental |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Infrastructure products |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Information services |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008, Main Street had one investment that was greater than 10% of its total
investment portfolio at fair value. That investment represented approximately 14.3% of the
portfolio at fair value. At December 31, 2007, Main Street had one investment that was greater than
10% of its total investment portfolio at fair value. That investment represented approximately
10.5% of the portfolio at fair value.
NOTE D WHOLLY OWNED INVESTMENT MANAGER
As part of the Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager became a wholly owned subsidiary
of MSCC. However, the Investment Manager is accounted for as a portfolio investment of Main Street
since the Investment Manager conducts a significant portion of its investment management activities
for Main Street Capital II, a separate SBIC fund, which is not part of MSCC or one of its
subsidiaries. The investment in the Investment Manager is accounted for using fair value
accounting, with the fair value determined by Main Street and approved, in good faith, by Main
Streets Board of Directors, based on the same valuation methodologies applied to determine the
original $18 million valuation. The original $18 million valuation for the Investment Manager was
based on the estimated present value of the net cash flows received for investment management
services provided to Main Street Capital II over the estimated dollar averaged life of the related
management contract, and was also based on comparable public market transactions. Any change in
fair value is recognized on Main Streets statement of operations as unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) in Investment in affiliated Investment Manager, with a corresponding increase (in
the case of appreciation) or decrease (in the case of depreciation) to
Investment in affiliated Investment Manager on Main Streets balance sheet. Main Street
believes that the valuation for the Investment Manager will decrease over the life of the
management contract with Main Street Capital II, absent obtaining additional future recurring cash
flows from performing investment management activities for other external investment entities.
20
The Investment Manager has elected for tax purposes to be treated as a taxable entity and is
taxed at normal corporate tax rates based on its taxable income. The taxable income of the
Investment Manager may differ from its book income due to temporary book and tax timing
differences, as well as permanent differences. The Investment Manager provides for any current
taxes payable and deferred tax items in its separate financial statements.
MSCC has a support services agreement with the Investment Manager. As a wholly owned
subsidiary of MSCC, the Investment Manager manages the day-to-day operational and investment
activities of Main Street. The Investment Manager pays normal operating and administrative
expenses, except those specifically required to be borne by MSCC, which principally include direct
costs that are specific to MSCCs status as a publicly traded entity. The expenses paid by the
Investment Manager include the cost of salaries and related benefits, rent, equipment and other
administrative costs required for Main Streets day-to-day operations.
Subsequent to the Formation Transactions and the Offering, the Investment Manager is
reimbursed for its excess expenses associated with providing investment management and other
services to MSCC and its subsidiaries, as well as Main Street Capital II. Each quarter, under a
support services agreement, MSCC makes payments to cover all expenses incurred by the Investment
Manager, less the recurring amounts that the Investment Manager receives from Main Street Capital
II, pursuant to a long-term investment advisory services agreement.
Summarized financial information for the Investment Manager is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
118,182 |
|
|
$ |
129,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
118,182 |
|
|
$ |
129,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities** |
|
$ |
262,993 |
|
|
$ |
274,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
262,993 |
|
|
$ |
274,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Management fee income from Main Street Capital II |
|
$ |
831,300 |
|
Compensation and other administrative expenses (net of reimbursement by MSCC) |
|
|
(831,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Includes $94,535 and $207,783 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, due
to MSCC. |
Prior to the Formation Transactions and the Offering, the Fund had a management agreement with
the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager managed the day-to-day operational and investment
activities of the Fund, paying similar types of operating expenses as noted in the support services
agreement with MSCC. Management fees paid by the Fund to the Investment Manager for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 were $499,979. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, expenses
reimbursed by MSCC to the Investment Manager in connection with the support services agreement were
$226,567.
NOTE E SBIC DEBENTURES
SBIC debentures payable at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were $55 million. SBIC
debentures provide for interest to be paid semi-annually, with principal due at the applicable
10-year maturity date. The weighted average interest rate as of March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007 was 5.7806%. Main Street is subject to regular compliance examinations by the SBA. There have
been no historical findings resulting from these examinations.
21
NOTE F REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT
On December 31, 2007, Main Street entered into a Treasury Secured Revolving Credit Agreement
(the Credit Agreement) among Main Street, Wachovia Bank, National Association, and Branch Banking
and Trust Company (BB&T), as administrative agent for the lenders. Under the Credit Agreement,
the lenders have agreed to extend revolving loans to Main Street in an amount not to exceed $100
million. The purpose of the Credit Agreement is to provide flexibility in the sizing of portfolio
investments and to facilitate the growth of Main Streets investment portfolio. The Credit
Agreement has a two-year term and bears interest, at Main Streets option, either (i) at the LIBOR
rate or (ii) at a published prime rate of interest, plus 25 basis points in either case. The Credit
Agreement also requires payment of 15 basis points per annum in unused commitment fees based on the
average daily unused balances under the facility.
As of March 31, 2008, Main Street had $25 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement. On
April 1, 2008, Main Street repaid the $25 million in borrowings under the Credit Agreement. As of
December 31, 2007, Main Street had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement. For the
three months ended March 31, 2008, interest expense and unused commitment fees for the Credit
Agreement totaled $3,819 and $38,299, respectively.
NOTE G FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights are prepared in accordance with the guidance for exchanges of equity interests
between entities under common control contained in SFAS 141, with the 2007 ratios and per share
amounts calculated as if the Formation Transactions and the Offering had occurred as of January 1,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period |
|
$ |
12.85 |
|
|
$ |
5.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (1) |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Net realized gains (1), (2) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments (1), (2) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Income taxes (1) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations (1) |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Net decrease in net assets from dividends paid to stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from distributions to partners, net of contributions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at March 31, 2008 and 2007 |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
|
$ |
4.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
13.68 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Shares outstanding at March 31, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
|
8,526,726 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. |
|
(2) |
|
Net realized gains and net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation can
fluctuate significantly from period to period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net assets at end of period |
|
$ |
115,305,540 |
|
|
$ |
41,489,832 |
|
Average net assets |
|
|
71,289,127 |
|
|
|
42,381,182 |
|
Average outstanding debt |
|
|
55,000,000 |
|
|
|
50,050,000 |
|
Ratio of total expenses, excluding interest expense, to average net assets (3) |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets (3) |
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (3) |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
2.76 |
% |
Total return based on change in net asset value(1)(2) |
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
4.11 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total return based on change in net asset value was calculated using the sum of ending net asset value plus
distributions to stockholders and/or members and partners during the period less capital contributions
during the period, divided by the beginning net asset value. |
|
(2) |
|
For the periods prior to the Formation Transactions, this ratio combines the total return for both the
managing investors (the General Partner) and the non-managing investors (limited partners). |
|
(3) |
|
Not annualized. |
22
NOTE H DIVIDEND, DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXABLE INCOME
On February 2, 2008, Main Streets Board of Directors declared a dividend of approximately $3
million or $0.34 per common share. The determination of the tax attributes of Main Streets
distributions is made annually, based upon its taxable income for the full year and distributions
paid for the full year. Therefore, a determination made on a quarterly basis may not be
representative of the actual tax attributes of distributions for a full year. Main Streets
estimates for the tax attributes of its distributions year-to-date as of March 31, 2008 allocate
approximately 80% of such distributions to ordinary income and 20% to long-term capital gains.
There can be no assurance that this determination is representative of the final tax attributes of
Main Streets 2008 distributions to its stockholders. Ordinary dividend distributions from a RIC do
not qualify for the 15% maximum tax rate on dividend income from domestic corporations and
qualified foreign corporations, except to the extent that the RIC received the income in the form
of qualifying dividends from domestic corporations and qualified foreign corporations (which Main
Street did not receive during the year-to-date period of 2008).
Main Street intends to elect to be treated as a RIC on its 2007 and 2008 tax returns. As a
RIC, Main Street generally will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary
income or capital gains that Main Street distributes to its stockholders as dividends. Main Street
must distribute at least 90% of its investment company taxable income to qualify for pass-through
tax treatment and maintain its RIC status. Main Street has distributed and currently intends to
distribute sufficient dividends to qualify as a RIC. As part of maintaining RIC status, taxable
income (subject to a 4% excise tax) pertaining to a given fiscal year may be distributed up to
12 months subsequent to the end of that fiscal year, provided such dividends are declared prior to
the filing of Main Streets federal income tax return.
One of Main Streets wholly owned subsidiaries, MSEI, is a taxable entity which holds certain
portfolio investments for Main Street. MSEI is consolidated with Main Street, and the portfolio
investments held by MSEI are included in Main Streets consolidated financial statements. The
purpose of MSEI is to permit Main Street to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which
are pass through entities for tax purposes in order to comply with the source income
requirements contained in the RIC tax provisions of the Code. MSEI is not consolidated with Main
Street for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as a result of its ownership of
various portfolio investments. This income tax expense, if any, is reflected in Main Streets
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Listed below is a reconciliation of Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations to
taxable income and to total distributions to common stockholders for the three months ended
March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
3,202,636 |
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation from investments, excluding taxable subsidiary, MSEI |
|
|
168,986 |
|
Net income from taxable subsidiary, MSEI, net of income tax provision |
|
|
(482,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income |
|
|
2,888,894 |
|
Taxable income earned in prior year and carried forward for distribution in current year |
|
|
1,445,059 |
|
Taxable income earned in current quarter and carried forward for distribution in next quarter |
|
|
(1,287,649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to common stockholders |
|
$ |
3,046,304 |
|
23
Prior to the Formation Transactions, the Fund was taxed under the partnership provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code. Under these provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the General Partner
and limited partners are responsible for reporting their share of the partnerships income or loss
on their income tax returns. Listed below is a reconciliation of Net Increase in Members Equity
and Partners Capital Resulting From Operations to taxable income for the three months ended March
31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in members equity and partners capital resulting from operations |
|
$ |
1,779,474 |
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation from investments |
|
|
137,596 |
|
Accrual basis to cash basis adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
Deferred debt origination fees included in taxable income |
|
|
48,000 |
|
Accretion of unearned fee income for book income |
|
|
(106,870 |
) |
Net change in interest receivable |
|
|
58,709 |
|
Net change in interest payable |
|
|
(630,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Taxable income |
|
$ |
1,286,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE I DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
Main Street maintains a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for the reinvestment of
dividends on behalf of its stockholders, unless a stockholder has elected to receive dividends in
cash. As a result, if Main Street declares a cash dividend, the companys stockholders who have not
opted out of the DRIP by the dividend record date will have their cash dividend automatically
reinvested into additional shares of MSCC common stock. Main Street has the option to satisfy the
share requirements of the DRIP through the issuance of shares of common stock or through open
market purchases of common stock by the DRIP plan administrator. Newly issued shares will be valued
based upon the final closing price of MSCCs common stock on the valuation date determined by Main
Streets Board of Directors. Shares purchased in the open market to satisfy the DRIP requirements
will be valued based upon the average price of the applicable shares purchased by the DRIP plan
administrator, before any associated brokerage or other costs. For the three months ended March 31,
2008, $1,248,255 of the total $3,046,304 distribution to stockholders represented DRIP
participation and 94,065 common stock were purchased in the open market to satisfy the DRIP
participation requirements. For the year ended December 31, 2007, $1,903,116 of the total
$2,912,820 distribution to stockholders represented DRIP participation and 132,992 shares of new
common stock were issued to satisfy the DRIP participation requirements.
NOTE J SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
Listed below are the supplemental cash flow disclosures for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,585,297 |
|
|
$ |
1,295,257 |
|
Taxes paid |
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
NOTE K RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Main Street co-invested with Main Street Capital II, LP (MSC II) in several investments
prior to the Offering. MSC II is managed by the Investment Manager, and the Investment Manager is
wholly owned by MSCC. MSC II is an SBIC fund with similar investment objectives to Main Street and
which began its investment operations in January 2006. The co-investments among Main Street and MSC
II were made at the same time and on the same terms and conditions. The co-investments were made in
accordance with the Investment Managers conflicts policy and in accordance with the applicable
SBIC conflict of interest regulations.
As discussed further in note, Wholly Owned Investment Manager, Main Street paid certain
management fees to the Investment Manager during the year ended December 31, 2007. Subsequent to
the Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager is a wholly owned, portfolio company of Main
Street. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Investment Manager had a payable of $94,535
and $207,783, respectively, due to MSCC related to the funding of recurring administrative expenses
required to support MSCCs business.
24
NOTE L SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to March 31, 2008, Main Street made a self-sponsored investment totaling $13.7
million in OMi Holdings, Inc., providing a one stop debt and equity financing for this designer,
manufacturer and installer of overhead material handling equipment.
On April 1, 2008, Main Street repaid the $25 million outstanding balance borrowed under the
Credit Agreement.
On April 9, 2008, Main Street exited its remaining debt investment in East Teak Hardwoods,
Inc. (East Teak). Main Street realized a cash internal rate of return of approximately 24% on its
total $4.2 million debt investment. Main Street continues to hold its original equity investment in
East Teak, a leading provider of teak lumber, exotic hardwoods and hardwood products with operating
locations in South Carolina and Washington.
On May 1, 2008, Main Street declared a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. This quarterly
dividend will be paid based upon the accumulated taxable income recognized by Main Street,
including excess undistributed taxable income from 2007 that was carried forward for distribution
during 2008. The quarterly dividend will be payable on June 12, 2008 to stockholders of record on
May 12, 2008.
25
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Please see Risk Factors and Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on March
21, 2008, for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these
statements. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements
and related notes and other financial information included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
ORGANIZATION
Main Street Capital Corporation (MSCC) was formed on March 9, 2007 for the purpose of (i)
acquiring 100% of the equity interests of Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP (the Fund) and its
general partner, Main Street Mezzanine Management, LLC (the General Partner), (ii) acquiring 100%
of the equity interests of Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (the Investment Manager), (iii)
raising capital in an initial public offering, which was completed in October 2007 (the
Offering), and (iv) thereafter operating as an internally managed business development company
(BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The transactions
discussed above were consummated in October 2007 and are collectively termed the Formation
Transactions. Immediately following the Formation Transactions, Main Street Equity Interests, Inc.
(MSEI) was created as a wholly owned consolidated subsidiary of MSCC. MSEI has elected for tax
purposes to be treated as a taxable entity and is taxed at normal corporate tax rates based on its
taxable income. Unless otherwise noted or the context otherwise indicates, the terms we, us,
our and Main Street refer to the Fund and the General Partner prior to the Offering and to MSCC
and its subsidiaries, including the Fund and the General Partner, subsequent to the Offering.
OVERVIEW
We are a specialty investment company focused on providing customized debt and equity
financing to lower middle-market companies, which we define as companies with annual revenues
between $10.0 and $100.0 million that operate in diverse industries. We invest primarily in secured
debt instruments, equity investments, warrants and other securities of lower middle-market
companies based in the United States. Our principal investment objective is to maximize our
portfolios total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital
appreciation from our equity-related investments. Our investments generally range in size from $2.0
million to $15.0 million. We seek to fill the current financing gap for lower middle-market
businesses, which have limited access to financing from commercial banks and other traditional
sources. The underserved nature of the lower middle-market creates the opportunity for us to meet
the financing needs of lower middle-market companies while also negotiating favorable transaction
terms and equity participations. Our ability to invest across a companys capital structure, from
senior secured loans to equity securities, allows us to offer portfolio companies a comprehensive
suite of financing solutions, or one stop financing.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements are prepared on an accrual basis in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the
financial statements of Main Street include the accounts of MSCC, the Fund, MSEI and the General
Partner. The Formation Transactions involved an exchange of equity interests between companies
under common control. In accordance with the guidance on exchanges of equity interests between
entities under common control contained in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), Main Streets results of operations and cash flows for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 are presented as if the Formation Transactions had occurred as of
January 1, 2007. Main Streets results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007 and financial position as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are
presented on a consolidated basis. The effects of all intercompany transactions between Main Street
and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been
made to prior period balances to conform with the current financial statement presentation.
26
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Main Street are presented in
conformity with GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for
reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures
accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. In the
opinion of our management, the unaudited consolidated financial results included herein contain all
adjustments, consisting solely of normal
recurring accruals considered necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for
the interim periods included herein. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31,
2008 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year.
Also, the unaudited financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with our audited
financial statements and notes thereto for the period ended December 31, 2007. Financial statements
prepared on a GAAP basis require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts and disclosures reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Those
estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known, which could
impact the amounts reported and disclosed in this report.
Under the investment company rules and regulations pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation S-X and
the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies issued by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (the AICPA Guide), we are precluded from consolidating portfolio
company investments, including those in which we have a controlling interest, unless the portfolio
company is another investment company. An exception to this general principle in the AICPA Guide
occurs if we own a controlled operating company that provides all or substantially all of its
services directly to us, or to an investment company of ours. None of the investments made by us
qualify for this exception. Therefore, our portfolio investments are carried on the balance sheet
at fair value, as discussed further in Note B, with any adjustments to fair value recognized as
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) from Investments on our Statement of
Operations until the investment is disposed of, resulting in any gain or loss on exit being
recognized as a Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Investments.
Investment Valuation
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our financial statements is the
valuation of our portfolio investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and
depreciation. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, approximately 62% and 60%, respectively,
of our total assets represented investments in portfolio companies valued at fair value (including
the investment in the Investment Manager). We are required to report our investments at fair value.
We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), in the first
quarter of 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value,
establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value, and
enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements.
We invest primarily in illiquid assets with the intention to hold these assets to
settlement or maturity. This is in contrast to the premise under SFAS 157 that assets
generally should be valued on the basis of their current market value and, if no market
exists, on the basis that they are sold in a hypothetical market at the end of each
quarter. We have not historically exited our investments through the individual sale
of such investments, rather we have typically exited our investments through a sale of
the portfolio company or through the free cash flow, re-financing or recapitalization
of the portfolio company.
Under SFAS 157, we principally utilize the market approach to estimate the fair value of our
warrant and equity investments and the income approach to estimate the fair value of our debt
investments. Under the market approach, we estimate the enterprise value of the portfolio companies
in which we invest. The enterprise value is the fair value at which an enterprise could be sold in
a transaction between two willing parties, other than through a forced or liquidation sale.
Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before income
taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited
cases, book value. There is no single methodology for determining enterprise value. For any one
portfolio company, enterprise value is generally described as a range of values from which a single
estimate of enterprise value is derived. In estimating the enterprise value of a portfolio company,
we analyze various factors, including the portfolio companys historical and projected financial
results. Under the income approach, we generally prepare and analyze discounted cash flow models
based on our projections of the future free cash flows of the business and company specific capital
costs. We also use yield-to-maturity models to determine the present value of the future cash flow
streams of our debt investments.
For investments where we have control or could gain control
through an option or warrant security, the enterprise value
methodology is also considered for estimating the fair value of debt
investments.
We review external events, including private mergers and
acquisitions involving comparable companies, and include these events in the valuation process.
Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, our estimate of fair value may
differ materially from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities
existed. In addition, changes in market environments and other events that may occur over the lives
of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be
different than the valuations currently assigned. We determine the fair value of each individual
investment and record changes in fair value as unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Revenue Recognition
Interest and Dividend Income
We record interest and dividend income on the accrual basis to the extent amounts are expected
to be collected. In accordance with our valuation policy, we evaluate accrued interest periodically
for collectibility. When a loan or debt security becomes 90 days or more past due, and if we
otherwise do not expect the debtor to be able to service all of its debt or other obligations, we
will generally place the loan or debt security on non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest
income on that loan or debt security until the borrower has demonstrated the ability and intent to
pay contractual amounts due. If a loan or debt securitys status significantly improves regarding
ability to service the debt or other obligations, or if a loan or debt security is fully impaired,
we will no longer
consider it to be on non-accrual status. Dividend income is recorded as dividends are declared
or at the point an obligation exists for the portfolio company to make a distribution.
27
Fee Income
We may periodically provide services, including structuring and advisory services, to our
portfolio companies. We recognize income from fees for providing such structuring and advisory
services when the services are rendered or the transactions are completed. We also receive up-front
debt origination or closing fees in connection with our debt investments. Such up-front debt
origination and closing fees are netted against the related investment as unearned income on our
balance sheet and amortized as additional interest income over the life of the related debt
investments.
Payment-in-Kind Interest (PIK)
While not significant to our total debt investment portfolio, we currently hold several loans
in our portfolio that contain PIK interest provisions. The PIK interest, computed at the
contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan
and recorded as interest income. To maintain RIC tax treatment (as discussed below), this non cash
source of income will need to be paid out to stockholders in the form of distributions, even though
we may not have collected the cash. We will stop accruing PIK interest and write off any accrued
and uncollected interest when it is determined that PIK interest is no longer collectible.
Income Taxes
We intend to qualify and elect for the tax treatment applicable to a RIC under Subchapter M of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and, among other things, intend to make
the required distributions to our stockholders as specified therein. In order to qualify as a RIC,
we are required to timely distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable
income, as defined by the Code, each year. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax
year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into
the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be
distributed prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such taxable
income.
MSCCs wholly owned subsidiary, MSEI, is a taxable entity which holds certain of our portfolio
investments. MSEI is consolidated with Main Street, and the portfolio investments held by MSEI are
included in our consolidated financial statements. The purpose of MSEI is to permit us to hold
equity investments in portfolio companies which are pass through entities for tax purposes in
order to comply with the source income requirements contained in the RIC tax requirements. MSEI
is not consolidated with Main Street for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as
a result of MSEIs ownership of various portfolio investments. This income tax expense, if any, is
reflected in our consolidated statement of operations.
MSEI uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities
and their reported amounts in the financial statements, using statutory tax rates in effect for the
year in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided
against deferred tax assets when we determine it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio investments principally consist of secured debt, equity warrants and direct equity
investments in privately held companies. The debt investments are secured by either a first or
second lien on the assets of the portfolio company, generally bear interest at fixed rates, and
generally mature between five and seven years from original investment. We also receive nominally
priced equity warrants and makes direct equity investments, usually in connection with a debt
investment in a portfolio company.
The Investment Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC. However, the Investment Manager
is accounted for as a portfolio investment of Main Street since it conducts a significant portion
of its investment management activities outside of MSCC and its subsidiaries. To allow for more
relevant disclosure of our core investment portfolio, our investment in the Investment Manager has
been excluded from the tables and amounts set forth below.
28
Summaries of the composition of our investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a
percentage of total portfolio investments are shown in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
First lien debt |
|
|
82.2 |
% |
|
|
81.5 |
% |
Equity |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Second lien debt |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
First lien debt |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
|
|
70.1 |
% |
Equity |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Second lien debt |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the portfolio composition by geographic region at cost and fair
value as a percentage of total portfolio investments. The geographic composition is determined by
the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
31.9 |
% |
West |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
West |
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set forth below are tables showing the industry composition of our portfolio at cost and fair
value as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Precast concrete manufacturing |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Manufacturing |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Agricultural services |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Electronics manufacturing |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Mining and minerals |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Custom wood products |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Health care products |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Industrial equipment |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Transportation/logistics |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Health care services |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Metal fabrication |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Retail |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Equipment rental |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Infrastructure products |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Information services |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Industrial services |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Precast concrete manufacturing |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Mining and minerals |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Electronics manufacturing |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Agricultural services |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Health care products |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Custom wood products |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Transportation/logistics |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Health care services |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Industrial equipment |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Metal fabrication |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Retail |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Industrial services |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Equipment rental |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Infrastructure products |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Information services |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our portfolio investments carry a number of risks including, but not limited to: (1) investing
in lower middle-market companies which have a limited operating history and financial resources;
(2) holding investments that are not publicly traded and which may be subject to legal and other
restrictions on resale; and (3) other risks common to investing in below investment grade debt and
equity investments in private, smaller companies.
PORTFOLIO ASSET QUALITY
We utilize an internally developed investment rating system for our entire portfolio of
investments. Investment Rating 1 represents a portfolio company that is performing in a manner
which significantly exceeds our original expectations and projections. Investment Rating 2
represents a portfolio company that in general is performing above our original expectations.
Investment Rating 3 represents a portfolio company that is generally performing in accordance with
our original expectations. Investment Rating 4 represents a portfolio company that is
underperforming our original expectations. Investments with such a rating require Main Street
monitoring/scrutiny. Investment Rating 5 represents a portfolio company that is significantly
underperforming. Investments with such a rating require heightened levels of Main Street monitoring
and scrutiny and involve the recognition of unrealized depreciation on such investment.
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on our 1 to 5 investment rating
scale at fair value as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (excluding Main Streets investment
in the Investment Manager):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Investment |
|
at |
|
|
Total of |
|
|
at |
|
|
Total of |
|
Rating |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
$ |
27,179 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
$ |
24,619 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
2 |
|
|
50,104 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
35,068 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
3 |
|
|
22,252 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
24,034 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
4 |
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
105,053 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
88,025 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Based upon our investment rating system, the weighted average rating of our portfolio as of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was approximately 2.1
and 2.2, respectively. As of March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, we had two and one, respectively, debt investments representing 2.4%
and 3.1%, respectively, of total portfolio fair value which were on non-accrual status.
In the event that the United States economy enters into a prolonged recession, it is
possible that the financial results of small- to mid-sized companies, similar to those
in which we invest, could experience deterioration, which could ultimately lead to
difficulty in meeting debt service requirements and an increase in defaults. While we
are not seeing signs of an overall, broad deterioration in our portfolio company results
at this time, we can provide no assurance that the performance of certain of our
portfolio companies will not be negatively impacted by these economic or other conditions
which could have a negative impact on our future results.
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Comparison of three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Net Change |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Income |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
Total Expenses |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Net Realized Gains from Investments |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Income |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation
(Depreciation) from Investments |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, total investment income was $4.0 million, a $1.6
million, or 67%, increase over the $2.4 million of total investment income for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The increase was attributable to a $1.1 million increase in interest, fee and
dividend income from investments and a $0.5 million increase in interest income from idle funds,
which was principally related to the remaining proceeds from our initial public offering. The
increase in interest, fee and dividend income was primarily attributable to (i) higher average
levels of outstanding debt investments, which was principally due to the closing of six new debt
investments since March 31, 2007, partially offset by debt repayments received during the same
period, and (ii) higher levels of cash dividend income and fee income from portfolio equity
investments.
Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, total expenses increased by approximately $0.3
million, or 23%, to approximately $1.5 million from $1.3 million for the three months ended March
31, 2007. The increase in total expenses was primarily attributable to a $0.1 million increase in
interest expense as a result of the additional $9.9 million of SBIC Debentures borrowed during
2007. In addition, general and administrative expenses increased $0.7 million, primarily
attributable to an increase in administration costs associated with being a public company.
However, Main Street incurred no management fee expenses during the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to $0.5 million in the corresponding period in 2007.
Net Investment Income
Net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $2.5 million, or a 114%
increase, compared to net investment income of $1.2 million during the three months ended March 31,
2007. The increase in net investment income was attributable to the increase in total investment
income, partially offset by the increase in total expenses.
Net Realized Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the net realized gains from investments was $0.6
million, representing a $0.1 million, or an 18% decrease over the net realized gains of $0.7
million during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The net realized gains during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 principally related to a realized gain on the sale of one investment,
compared to the sale or redemption of equity investments in two portfolio companies during the
three months ended March 31, 2007.
31
The lower net realized gains in the three months ended March 31, 2008, offset by the higher
net investment income during that period, resulted in a $1.2 million, or 63%, increase, in the net
realized income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared with the corresponding period in
2007.
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we recorded a net change in unrealized
appreciation in the amount of $0.3 million, or a $0.4 million increase over the
$(0.1) million in net change in unrealized depreciation for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The net change in unrealized appreciation for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 included (i) unrealized appreciation on seven investments in portfolio
companies totaling $3.8 million, including appreciation of $2.2 million on one recently
closed transaction, partially offset by $3.4 million in unrealized depreciation recognized
on four portfolio investments, (ii) unrealized appreciation on debt investments totaling
$0.7 million as a result of adopting SFAS 157, (iii) the reclassification of $0.6 million
of previously recognized unrealized gains into realized gains on one exited investment,
and (iv) unrealized depreciation of $0.2 million related to the Investment Manager.
As a result of these events, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations during
the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $3.2 million, or a 80% increase compared to a net
increase in net assets resulting from operations of $1.8 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we experienced a net increase in cash and
equivalents in the amount of $32.1 million. During that period, we generated $1.5 million of cash
from our operating activities, primarily from net investment income partially offset by the
semi-annual interest payment on our SBIC debentures. We also generated $8.7 million in net cash
from investing activities, principally including the funding of new investments and several smaller
follow-on investments for a total of $18.1 million, offset by proceeds from the maturity of a $24.1
million investment in idle funds investments, $2.0 million in cash proceeds from repayment of debt
investments and $0.7 million of cash proceeds from the redemption and sale of equity investments.
During the first three months of 2008, we generated $22.0 million in cash from financing
activities, which principally consisted of the net proceeds from a $25.0 million line of credit
borrowing, partially offset by $3.0 million of cash dividends to stockholders.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we experienced a net increase in cash and cash
equivalents in the amount of $6.1 million. During that period, we generated $0.4 million of cash
from our operating activities, primarily from net investment income, partially offset by the
semi-annual interest payment on our SBIC debentures. During the three months ended March 31, 2007,
we used $0.4 million in cash for investing activities. The first calendar quarter 2007 net cash
used for investing activities principally included the funding of one new investment and several
smaller follow-on investments for a total of $3.1 million of invested capital, partially offset by
$1.6 million in cash proceeds from repayment of debt investments and $1.1 million of cash proceeds
from the redemption and sale of two equity investments. During the first quarter of 2007, we
generated $6.1 million in cash from financing activities, which principally consisted of the net
proceeds from $9.9 million in additional SBIC debenture borrowings, partially offset by $3.6
million of cash distributions to partners.
Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2008, we had $74.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, and our net assets
totaled $115.3 million.
We intend to generate additional cash from future offerings of securities, future borrowings
and cash flow from operations, including income earned from investments in our portfolio companies
and, to a lesser extent, from the temporary investments of cash in U.S. government securities and
other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Our primary use of funds will
be investments in portfolio companies, operating expenses and cash distributions to holders of our
common stock. Consistent with estimates in prior periods, we continue to project that we will be
able to fund our investment activities through 2008 without requiring new capital.
In order to satisfy the Code requirements applicable to a RIC, we intend to distribute to our
stockholders substantially all our taxable income, but we may also elect to periodically spillover
certain taxable income from one tax year into another. In addition, as a business development
company, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total senior
securities, which
include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock we may issue in the future, of at least
200.0%. This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow.
32
We anticipate that we will continue to fund our investment activities through existing cash
and cash equivalents and a combination of future debt and additional equity capital. Due to our
status as a licensed SBIC, we have the ability to issue debentures guaranteed by the Small Business
Administration (the SBA) at favorable interest rates. Under the regulations applicable to SBICs,
an SBIC can have outstanding debentures guaranteed by the SBA generally in an amount up to twice
its regulatory capital, which generally is the amount of its equity capital. The maximum statutory
limit on the dollar amount of outstanding debentures guaranteed by the SBA issued by a single SBIC
or group of SBICs under common control as of March 31, 2008, was $130.6 million (which amount is
subject to increase on an annual basis based on cost-of-living index increases).
Because of our investment teams affiliations with Main Street Capital II, a separate SBIC
which commenced investment operations in January 2006, we and Main Street Capital II may be deemed
to be a group of SBICs under common control. Thus, the dollar amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures
that can be issued collectively by us and by Main Street Capital II may be limited to $130.6
million, absent relief from the SBA. Currently, we do not intend to borrow SBA-guaranteed
indebtedness in excess of $55.0 million based on our existing equity capital.
Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have fixed interest rates that approximate prevailing 10-year
Treasury Note rates plus a spread and have a maturity of ten years with interest payable
semi-annually. The principal amount of the debentures is not required to be paid before maturity
but may be pre-paid at any time. Debentures issued prior to September 2006 were subject to
pre-payment penalties during their first five years. Those pre-payment penalties no longer apply to
debentures issued after September 1, 2006. On March 31, 2008, we had $55 million of outstanding
indebtedness guaranteed by the SBA, which carried an average fixed interest rate of approximately
5.8%.
On December 31, 2007, we entered into a Treasury Secured Revolving Credit Agreement (the
Credit Agreement) among us, Wachovia Bank, National Association, and Branch Banking and Trust
Company (BB&T), as administrative agent for the lenders. Under the Credit Agreement, the lenders
have agreed to extend revolving loans to us in an amount not to exceed $100 million. The purpose of
the Credit Agreement is to provide us flexibility in the sizing of portfolio investments and to
facilitate the growth of our investment portfolio. The Credit Agreement has a two-year term and
bears interest, at our option, either (i) at the LIBOR rate or (ii) at a published prime rate of
interest, plus 25 basis points in each case. The applicable interest rates under the Credit
Agreement would be increased by 15 basis points if usage under the Credit Agreement is in excess of
50% of the days within a given calendar quarter. The Credit Agreement also requires payment of 15
basis points per annum in unused commitment fees based on average daily unused balances under the
facility. The Credit Agreement is secured by certain securities accounts maintained by BB&T and is
also guaranteed by the Investment Manager. As of March 31, 2008, we had $25 million outstanding
under this credit agreement. On April 1, 2008, we repaid the $25 million outstanding balance. As
of December 31, 2007, we had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
Current Market Conditions
The debt and equity capital markets in the United States have been severely impacted by
significant write-offs in the financial services sector relating to subprime mortgages and the
re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated bank loan market, among other things. These
events, along with the deterioration of the housing market, have led to worsening general economic
conditions which have impacted the broader financial and credit markets and have reduced the
availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial firms in
particular. Although we have been able to access the capital markets in the past to finance our
investment activities, due to the current turmoil in the debt markets and uncertainty in the equity
capital markets, we can provide no assurance that debt or equity capital will be available to us on
favorable terms, or at all.
In the event that the United States economy enters into a protracted recession, it is possible
that the results of some of the lower middle-market companies, similar to those in which we invest,
could experience deterioration, which could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting debt service
requirements and an increase in defaults. While we are not seeing signs of an overall, broad
deterioration in our portfolio company results at this time, we can provide no assurance that the
performance of certain of our portfolio companies will not be negatively impacted by economic or
other conditions which could have a negative impact on our future results.
33
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This statement addresses how to calculate fair value measurements required or
permitted under other accounting pronouncements. Accordingly, this statement does not require any
new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this statement will
change current practice. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 in the first quarter of
2008. With the adoption of this statement, Main Street incorporated the income approach to estimate
the fair value of its debt investments principally using a yield-to-maturity model, resulting in
the recognition of $654,335 in unrealized appreciation on its debt investments.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159), which provides
companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The
objective of SFAS 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the
volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS 159
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between
companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities
and to more easily understand the effect of the companys choice to use fair value on its earnings.
SFAS 159 also requires entities to display the fair value of the selected assets and liabilities on
the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other
accounting standards, including fair value measurement disclosures in SFAS 157. This Statement is
effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007.
Main Street adopted the provisions of SFAS 159 in the first quarter of 2008. Main Street did not
elect fair value measurement for assets or liabilities not already measured at fair value.
Therefore, the adoption of this statement did not have an impact on Main Streets consolidated
financial position or its results of operations.
Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant effect on our results of operations in any of the
reporting periods presented in this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We may be a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. These instruments include
commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of
the amount recognized in the balance sheet. However, as of March 31, 2008, we had no unused firm
commitments to extend credit to our portfolio companies, which are not reflected on our balance
sheet.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2007, our future fixed commitments for cash payments on contractual
obligations for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 and |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
thereafter |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
SBIC debentures payable |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
Interest due on SBIC debentures |
|
|
24,684 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
8,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
79,684 |
|
|
$ |
3,188 |
|
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,188 |
|
|
$ |
63,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCC is obligated to make payments under a support services agreement with the Investment
Manager. The Investment Manager is reimbursed for its expenses associated with providing investment
management and other services to MSCC and its subsidiaries, as well as Main Street Capital II.
Each quarter, as part of the support services agreement, MSCC makes payments to cover all expenses
incurred by the Investment Manager, less amounts the Investment Manager receives from Main Street
Capital II pursuant to a separate investment advisory services agreement.
Related Party Transactions
We co-invested with Main Street Capital II, LP (MSC II) in several investments prior to the
Offering. MSC II is managed by the Investment Manager, and the Investment Manager is wholly owned
by MSCC. MSC II is an SBIC fund with similar investment objectives to ours and which began its
investment operations in January 2006. The co-investments among MSC II and us were made at
the same time and on the same terms and conditions. The co-investments were made in accordance
with the Investment Managers conflicts policy and in accordance with the applicable SBIC conflict
of interest regulations.
34
As discussed further in note D, Wholly Owned Investment Manager, Main Street paid certain
management fees to the Investment Manager during the year ended December 31, 2007. Subsequent to
the Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager is a wholly owned, portfolio company of Main
Street. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Investment Manager had a payable of $94,535
and $207,783 due to MSCC, respectively, related to the funding of recurring administrative expenses
required to support MSCCs business.
Recent Developments
Subsequent to March 31, 2008, Main Street made a self-sponsored investment totaling $13.7
million in OMi Holdings, Inc., providing a one stop debt and equity financing for this designer,
manufacturer and installer of overhead material handling equipment.
On
April 1, 2008, Main Street repaid the $25 million
outstanding balance borrowed under the
Credit Agreement.
On April 9, 2008, Main Street exited its remaining debt investment in East Teak Hardwoods,
Inc. (East Teak). Main Street realized a cash internal rate of return of approximately 24% on its
total $4.2 million debt investment. Main Street continues to hold its original equity investment in
East Teak, a leading provider of teak lumber, exotic hardwoods and hardwood products with operating
locations in South Carolina and Washington.
On May 1, 2008, Main Street declared a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. This quarterly
dividend will be paid based upon the accumulated taxable income recognized by Main Street,
including excess undistributed taxable income from 2007 that was carried forward for distribution
during 2008. The quarterly dividend will be payable on June 12, 2008 to stockholders of record on
May 12, 2008.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. Changes in
interest rates may affect both our cost of funding and our interest income from portfolio
investments, cash and cash equivalents and idle funds investments. Our risk management systems and
procedures are designed to identify and analyze our risk, to set appropriate policies and limits
and to continually monitor these risks and limits by means of reliable administrative and
information systems and other policies and programs. Our investment income will be affected by
changes in various interest rates, including LIBOR and prime rates, to the extent of any of our
debt investments that include floating interest rates. The significant majority of our debt
investments are made with fixed interest rates for the term of the investment. However, as of March
31, 2008, approximately 15.2% of our debt investment portfolio (at cost) bore interest at floating
rates. All of our current outstanding indebtedness is subject to fixed interest rates for the
10-year life of such debt. As of March 31, 2008, we had not entered into any interest rate hedging
arrangements. At March 31, 2008, based on our applicable levels of floating-rate debt investments,
a 1% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our level of interest income from
debt investments.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, our President and Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Compliance Officer and our
Chief Accounting Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based
on that evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, our President and Chief Financial
Officer, our Chief Compliance Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer, have concluded that our
current disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them of material
information relating to us that is required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 that have materially
affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
35
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of our operations in
the normal course of business or otherwise, we are currently not a party to any pending material
legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There were no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, that we filed with the SEC on March 21,
2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the first quarter of 2008, as a part of Main Streets dividend reinvestment plan for
our common stockholders, we directed the plan administrator to purchase 94,065 shares of our common
stock for $1,248,255 in the open market in order to satisfy our obligations to deliver shares of
common stock to our stockholders with respect to our dividend for the first quarter of 2008. The
following chart summarizes repurchases of our common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
of Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Paid Per |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
January 1, 2008 through January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2008 through February 29,
2008 |
|
|
47,400 |
|
|
$ |
13.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008 |
|
|
46,665 |
|
|
$ |
13.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits.
Listed below are the exhibits which are filed as part of this report (according to the number
assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U. S.
C. 1350). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U. S.
C. 1350). |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as indicated, and incorporated herein by reference. |
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Street Capital Corporation
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008 |
/s/ Vincent D. Foster
|
|
|
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008 |
/s/ Todd A. Reppert
|
|
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer) |
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008 |
/s/ Michael S. Galvan
|
|
|
Michael S. Galvan |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(principal accounting officer) |
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008 |
/s/ Rodger A. Stout
|
|
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
Senior Vice President-Finance & Administration,
Chief Compliance Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |
|
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U. S.
C. 1350). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U. S. C. 1350). |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as indicated, and incorporated herein by reference. |
38