UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from: to
Commission File Number: 001-33723
Main Street Capital Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
41-2230745 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800 |
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
77056 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(713) 350-6000
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
n/a
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller
reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock as of August 12, 2008 was 9,225,363.
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (cost: $64,258,409 and $43,053,372 as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
$ |
70,135,635 |
|
|
$ |
48,108,197 |
|
Affiliate investments (cost: $33,866,635 and $33,037,053 as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
36,127,151 |
|
|
|
36,176,216 |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments (cost: $6,133,213 and $3,381,001 as of June
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
6,551,980 |
|
|
|
3,741,001 |
|
Investment in affiliated Investment Manager (cost: $18,000,000 as of June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007) |
|
|
17,160,538 |
|
|
|
17,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments (cost: $122,258,257 and $97,471,426 as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
129,975,304 |
|
|
|
105,650,414 |
|
Idle funds investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,063,261 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
40,858,475 |
|
|
|
41,889,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,203,954 |
|
|
|
1,574,888 |
|
Deferred financing costs (net of accumulated amortization of $668,532 and $529,952
as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
1,547,949 |
|
|
|
1,670,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
173,585,682 |
|
|
$ |
174,848,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBIC debentures |
|
$ |
55,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
55,000,000 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
481,402 |
|
|
|
3,025,672 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
1,100,589 |
|
|
|
1,062,672 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
345,956 |
|
|
|
610,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
56,927,947 |
|
|
|
59,698,814 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share (150,000,000 shares authorized and
8,959,718 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007) |
|
|
89,597 |
|
|
|
89,597 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
104,076,033 |
|
|
|
104,076,033 |
|
Undistributed net realized earnings |
|
|
5,685,966 |
|
|
|
6,067,131 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments, net of income taxes |
|
|
6,806,139 |
|
|
|
4,916,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets |
|
|
116,657,735 |
|
|
|
115,149,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and net assets |
|
$ |
173,585,682 |
|
|
$ |
174,848,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share |
|
$ |
13.02 |
|
|
$ |
12.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, fee and dividend income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments |
|
$ |
2,667,708 |
|
|
$ |
1,130,478 |
|
|
$ |
4,574,610 |
|
|
$ |
2,254,431 |
|
Affiliate investments |
|
|
1,043,901 |
|
|
|
1,577,492 |
|
|
|
2,108,862 |
|
|
|
2,508,657 |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments |
|
|
309,643 |
|
|
|
219,063 |
|
|
|
742,996 |
|
|
|
417,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest, fee and dividend income |
|
|
4,021,252 |
|
|
|
2,927,033 |
|
|
|
7,426,468 |
|
|
|
5,180,501 |
|
Interest from idle funds and other |
|
|
155,659 |
|
|
|
215,251 |
|
|
|
777,809 |
|
|
|
374,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income |
|
|
4,176,911 |
|
|
|
3,142,284 |
|
|
|
8,204,277 |
|
|
|
5,554,861 |
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees to affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(999,958 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
(921,206 |
) |
|
|
(840,588 |
) |
|
|
(1,803,842 |
) |
|
|
(1,547,242 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(669,130 |
) |
|
|
(135,570 |
) |
|
|
(1,309,799 |
) |
|
|
(171,335 |
) |
Professional costs related to initial public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(695,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(695,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
(1,590,336 |
) |
|
|
(2,171,387 |
) |
|
|
(3,113,641 |
) |
|
|
(3,413,785 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
2,586,575 |
|
|
|
970,897 |
|
|
|
5,090,636 |
|
|
|
2,141,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) FROM INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611,250 |
|
Affiliate investments |
|
|
99,154 |
|
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
710,404 |
|
|
|
256,179 |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized gain (loss) from investments |
|
|
99,154 |
|
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
710,404 |
|
|
|
596,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET REALIZED INCOME |
|
|
2,685,729 |
|
|
|
820,897 |
|
|
|
5,801,040 |
|
|
|
2,737,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN UNREALIZED APPRECIATION (DEPRECIATION)
FROM INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments |
|
|
(186,405 |
) |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
884,704 |
|
|
|
(641,250 |
) |
Affiliate investments |
|
|
(443,584 |
) |
|
|
450,001 |
|
|
|
(940,952 |
) |
|
|
663,822 |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments |
|
|
58,766 |
|
|
|
39,999 |
|
|
|
58,766 |
|
|
|
349,832 |
|
Investment in affiliated Investment Manager |
|
|
(234,733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net change in unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) from investments |
|
|
(805,956 |
) |
|
|
510,000 |
|
|
|
(461,944 |
) |
|
|
372,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
2,608,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,351,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
4,488,097 |
|
|
$ |
1,330,897 |
|
|
$ |
7,690,732 |
|
|
$ |
3,110,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME PER COMMON SHARE-BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET REALIZED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE-BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS/DISTRIBUTIONS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS PER
COMMON SHARE-BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
OUTSTANDING-BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
|
8,526,726 |
|
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
|
8,526,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members |
|
|
Limited |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Undistributed |
|
|
Investments, |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Partners |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid In |
|
|
Net Realized |
|
|
net of |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(General Partner) |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
181,770 |
|
|
$ |
25,239,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,266,043 |
|
|
$ |
13,585,479 |
|
|
$ |
43,272,531 |
|
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,465 |
|
Distributions to partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,587,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,587,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase resulting from
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,737,967 |
|
|
|
372,404 |
|
|
|
3,110,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
181,770 |
|
|
$ |
25,286,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,416,510 |
|
|
$ |
13,957,883 |
|
|
$ |
41,842,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
$ |
89,597 |
|
|
$ |
104,076,033 |
|
|
$ |
6,067,131 |
|
|
$ |
4,916,447 |
|
|
$ |
115,149,208 |
|
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,182,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,182,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase resulting from
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,801,040 |
|
|
|
1,889,692 |
|
|
|
7,690,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
$ |
89,597 |
|
|
$ |
104,076,033 |
|
|
$ |
5,685,966 |
|
|
$ |
6,806,139 |
|
|
$ |
116,657,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations: |
|
$ |
7,690,732 |
|
|
$ |
3,110,371 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from
operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of unearned income |
|
|
(595,189 |
) |
|
|
(412,929 |
) |
Net payment-in-kind interest accrual |
|
|
(223,439 |
) |
|
|
1,551 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
138,580 |
|
|
|
90,227 |
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments |
|
|
461,944 |
|
|
|
(372,404 |
) |
Net realized gain from investments |
|
|
(710,404 |
) |
|
|
(596,891 |
) |
Changes in other assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
165,365 |
|
|
|
31,828 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
220,891 |
|
|
|
(30,620 |
) |
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
(2,544,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,758 |
|
Accounts payable offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,914 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(259,446 |
) |
|
|
43,743 |
|
Deferred debt origination fees received |
|
|
377,366 |
|
|
|
197,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
4,722,130 |
|
|
|
2,649,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in portfolio companies |
|
|
(30,211,460 |
) |
|
|
(10,257,746 |
) |
Principal payments received on loans and debt securities |
|
|
5,747,542 |
|
|
|
5,440,540 |
|
Proceeds from sale of equity securities and related notes |
|
|
846,277 |
|
|
|
1,127,250 |
|
Proceeds from idle funds investments |
|
|
24,063,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investment activities |
|
|
445,620 |
|
|
|
(3,689,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,465 |
|
Distributions to members and partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,587,500 |
) |
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
|
(6,182,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of SBIC debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,900,000 |
|
Payment of deferred offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,201 |
) |
Payment of deferred loan costs and SBIC debenture fees |
|
|
(16,394 |
) |
|
|
(240,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(6,198,599 |
) |
|
|
4,934,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,030,849 |
) |
|
|
3,893,992 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
41,889,324 |
|
|
|
13,768,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
40,858,475 |
|
|
$ |
17,662,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Control Investments (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Café Brazil, LLC |
|
Casual Restaurant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity April 20, 2009) |
|
Group |
|
$ |
2,750,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,719,649 |
|
|
$ |
2,750,000 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 42.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,837 |
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,761,486 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceres Management, LLC (Lambs) |
|
Automotive Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2013) |
|
Services |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
2,352,548 |
|
|
|
2,352,548 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 42.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,552,548 |
|
|
|
3,552,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBT Nuggets, LLC |
|
Produces and Sells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2011) |
|
IT Certification |
|
|
1,860,000 |
|
|
|
1,811,640 |
|
|
|
1,860,000 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 29.1%) |
|
Training Videos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 10.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,315,640 |
|
|
|
3,810,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Manufacturing, LLC |
|
Industrial Metal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity August 31, 2012) |
|
Fabrication |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,189,653 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity August 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,823,923 |
|
|
|
1,980,000 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 18.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
|
|
1,020,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 8.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,645,576 |
|
|
|
4,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawthorne Customs & Dispatch Services, LLC |
|
Transportation/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity January 31, 2011) |
|
Logistics |
|
|
1,275,000 |
|
|
|
1,239,265 |
|
|
|
1,239,265 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 27.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
435,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 16.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,651,765 |
|
|
|
1,904,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydratec Holdings, LLC |
|
Agricultural Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
5,700,000 |
|
|
|
5,597,280 |
|
|
|
5,597,280 |
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
1,495,244 |
|
|
|
1,477,911 |
|
|
|
1,477,911 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 60%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,875,191 |
|
|
|
8,875,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, LLC |
|
Retail Jewelry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity November 14, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,182,662 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
13% current / 6% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity November 14, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
1,102,310 |
|
|
|
1,079,430 |
|
|
|
1,102,311 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 25.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,000 |
|
|
|
815,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638,092 |
|
|
|
3,117,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magna Card, Inc. |
|
Wholesale/Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% current / 0.4% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity September 30, 2010) |
|
Magnetic Products |
|
|
1,979,609 |
|
|
|
1,979,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 35.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,079,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAPCO Precast, LLC |
|
Precast Concrete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18% Secured Debt (Maturity February 1, 2013) |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
7,000,000 |
|
|
|
6,867,377 |
|
|
|
7,000,000 |
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity February 1, 2013) |
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,962,675 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 36.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,830,052 |
|
|
|
15,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMi Holdings, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity March 31, 2013) |
|
Overhead Cranes |
|
|
7,020,000 |
|
|
|
6,955,144 |
|
|
|
6,955,144 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 28.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,855,144 |
|
|
|
7,855,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quest Design & Production, LLC |
|
Design and Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% Secured Debt (Maturity June 30, 2013) |
|
of Custom Display |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
0% Secured Debt (Maturity June 30, 2013) |
|
Systems |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,865,060 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 40.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 20.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100,918 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA Acquisition Group, LP |
|
Processor of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity July 29, 2010) |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,320,000 |
|
|
|
1,287,025 |
|
|
|
1,320,000 |
|
Partnership Interest (7) (Fully diluted 18.3%) |
|
Aggregates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,500 |
|
|
|
3,435,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 18.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
3,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,727,025 |
|
|
|
8,205,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Scaffolding & Equipment, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity August 17, 2012) |
|
Scaffolding and |
|
|
1,002,083 |
|
|
|
993,497 |
|
|
|
993,497 |
|
13% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity August 17, 2012) |
|
Shoring Equipment |
|
|
3,278,029 |
|
|
|
3,222,179 |
|
|
|
3,222,179 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 18.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
992,063 |
|
|
|
1,025,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,207,739 |
|
|
|
5,240,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uvalco Supply, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 37.5%) |
|
Farm and Ranch Supply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
787,500 |
|
|
|
1,125,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wicks N More, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity April 26, 2011) |
|
High-end Candles |
|
|
3,816,680 |
|
|
|
3,552,124 |
|
|
|
212,000 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity April 1, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
Prime Secured Debt (Maturity March 9, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 11.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 21.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,230,124 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Control Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,258,409 |
|
|
|
70,135,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Affiliate Investments (4): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Millwork Company, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/Distributor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity February 5, 2012) |
|
of Wood Doors |
|
|
3,066,667 |
|
|
|
2,941,163 |
|
|
|
2,940,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 12.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,808 |
|
|
|
97,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,038,971 |
|
|
|
3,037,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Sensor Technologies, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 0.5% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2010) |
|
Commercial/ |
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 20.0%) |
|
Industrial Sensors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,850,000 |
|
|
|
4,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlton Global Resources, LLC |
|
Processor of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity November 15, 2011) |
|
Industrial Minerals |
|
|
4,791,944 |
|
|
|
4,655,835 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 8.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,055,835 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston Plating & Coatings, LLC |
|
Plating & Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity July 19, 2011) |
|
Coating Services |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 10.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
2,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,000 |
|
|
|
2,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KBK Industries, LLC |
|
Specialty Manufacturer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity January 23, 2011) |
|
of Oilfield and |
|
|
3,937,500 |
|
|
|
3,758,254 |
|
|
|
3,937,500 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity July 1, 2009) |
|
Industrial Products |
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
|
625,000 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity March 31, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
337,500 |
|
|
|
337,500 |
|
|
|
337,500 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 14.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,908,254 |
|
|
|
5,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurus Healthcare, LP |
|
Healthcare Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity May 7, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
2,835,000 |
|
|
|
2,788,839 |
|
|
|
2,835,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 18.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,893,839 |
|
|
|
4,035,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Trench Safety, LLC |
|
Trench & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% PIK Debt (Maturity April 16, 2014) |
|
Safety Equipment |
|
|
384,197 |
|
|
|
384,197 |
|
|
|
384,197 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 10.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,176,505 |
|
|
|
2,176,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulse Systems, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2009) |
|
Components for |
|
|
2,110,819 |
|
|
|
2,081,939 |
|
|
|
2,110,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 7.4%) |
|
Medical Devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,856 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,214,795 |
|
|
|
2,510,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation General, Inc. |
|
Taxi Cab/Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2010) |
|
Services |
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,421,920 |
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 24.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,491,920 |
|
|
|
3,840,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Air Systems, Ltd. |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity October 11, 2011) |
|
Chilling Systems |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
915,118 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vision Interests, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
Installer of Commercial |
|
|
3,760,000 |
|
|
|
3,559,738 |
|
|
|
3,760,000 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 8.9%) |
|
Signage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,000 |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 11.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,091,738 |
|
|
|
4,980,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WorldCall, Inc. |
|
Telecommunication/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity October 22, 2009) |
|
Information Services |
|
|
646,225 |
|
|
|
623,028 |
|
|
|
640,000 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 9.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,632 |
|
|
|
382,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
919,660 |
|
|
|
1,022,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,866,635 |
|
|
|
36,127,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (5): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Teak Fine Hardwoods, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 3.3%) |
|
Hardwood Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
490,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hayden Acquisition, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity March 9, 2009) |
|
Utility Structures |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,770,605 |
|
|
|
1,770,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support Systems Homes, Inc. |
|
Manages Substance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15% Current Debt (Maturity August 21, 2018) |
|
Abuse Treatment Centers |
|
|
241,375 |
|
|
|
241,375 |
|
|
|
241,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Innovations, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5% Secured Debt (Maturity January 16, 2015) |
|
Specialty Cutting Tools and Punches |
|
|
4,050,000 |
|
|
|
3,991,233 |
|
|
|
4,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Non-Control/Non- Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,133,213 |
|
|
|
6,551,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (Investment Manager)
100% of Membership Interests |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
17,160,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,258,257 |
|
|
$ |
129,975,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Equity and warrants are non-income producing,
unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See footnote C for summary geographic location of portfolio companies. |
|
(3) |
|
Control investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (1940
Act), as investments
in which more than 25% of the voting securities are owned or where
the ability to nominate greater than 50% of the board
representation is maintained. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in which between 5% and 25%
of the voting
securities are owned. |
|
(5) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are
neither Control investments nor
Affiliate investments. |
|
(6) |
|
Net of prepayments and accumulated unearned income. |
|
(7) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
9
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Control Investments (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Café Brazil, LLC |
|
Casual Restaurant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity April 20, 2009) |
|
Group |
|
$ |
2,750,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,702,931 |
|
|
$ |
2,702,931 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 42.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,837 |
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,744,768 |
|
|
|
3,952,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBT Nuggets, LLC |
|
Produces and Sells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2011) |
|
IT Certification |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
354,678 |
|
|
|
354,678 |
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2011) |
|
Training Videos |
|
|
1,860,000 |
|
|
|
1,805,275 |
|
|
|
1,805,275 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 29.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,000 |
|
|
|
1,145,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 10.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,663,953 |
|
|
|
3,649,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Manufacturing, LLC |
|
Industrial Metal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity August 31, 2012) |
|
Fabrication |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,188,636 |
|
|
|
1,188,636 |
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity August 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,809,216 |
|
|
|
1,809,216 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 18.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 8.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,629,852 |
|
|
|
3,719,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawthorne Customs & Dispatch Services, LLC |
|
Transportation/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity January 31, 2011) |
|
Logistics |
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
1,304,693 |
|
|
|
1,304,693 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 27.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
435,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 16.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,717,193 |
|
|
|
1,969,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hayden Acquisition, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity March 9, 2009) |
|
Utility Structures |
|
|
1,955,000 |
|
|
|
1,901,040 |
|
|
|
1,901,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydratec
Holdings, LLC
12.5% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2012) |
|
Agricultural Services |
|
|
5,700,000 |
|
|
|
5,588,729 |
|
|
|
5,588,729 |
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
1,845,244 |
|
|
|
1,825,911 |
|
|
|
1,825,911 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 60%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,214,640 |
|
|
|
9,214,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jensen
Jewelers of Idaho, LLC
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity November 14, 2011) |
|
Retail Jewelry |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,180,509 |
|
|
|
1,180,509 |
|
13% current
/ 6% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity November 14, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
1,069,457 |
|
|
|
1,044,190 |
|
|
|
1,044,190 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 25.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,000 |
|
|
|
815,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600,699 |
|
|
|
3,039,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magna Card, Inc. |
|
Wholesale/Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% current / 0.4% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity September 30, 2010) |
|
Magnetic Products |
|
|
2,021,079 |
|
|
|
1,958,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 35.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,058,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quest Design & Production, LLC |
|
Design and Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity December 1, 2010) |
|
of Custom Display |
|
|
3,991,542 |
|
|
|
3,964,853 |
|
|
|
3,964,853 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 26.0%) |
|
Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,004,853 |
|
|
|
4,004,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA Acquisition Group, LP |
|
Processor of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity July 29, 2010) |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,870,000 |
|
|
|
1,813,789 |
|
|
|
1,813,789 |
|
Partnership Interest (7) (Fully diluted 18.3%) |
|
Aggregates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,500 |
|
|
|
3,435,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 18.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
3,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,253,789 |
|
|
|
8,698,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Innovations, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2009) |
|
Specialty Cutting |
|
|
787,500 |
|
|
|
748,716 |
|
|
|
748,716 |
|
Prime Secured Debt (Maturity October 31, 2009) |
|
Tools and Punches |
|
|
262,500 |
|
|
|
249,572 |
|
|
|
249,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998,288 |
|
|
|
998,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Scaffolding & Equipment, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt (Maturity August 16, 2012) |
|
Scaffolding and |
|
|
1,122,333 |
|
|
|
1,111,741 |
|
|
|
1,111,741 |
|
13% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity August 16, 2012) |
|
Shoring Equipment |
|
|
3,196,376 |
|
|
|
3,136,274 |
|
|
|
3,136,274 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 18.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
992,063 |
|
|
|
1,025,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,240,078 |
|
|
|
5,273,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wicks N More, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity April 26, 2011) |
|
High-end Candles |
|
|
3,720,000 |
|
|
|
3,455,444 |
|
|
|
1,685,444 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 11.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 21.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,025,444 |
|
|
|
1,685,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Control Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,053,372 |
|
|
|
48,108,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Affiliate Investments (4): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Millwork Company, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/Distributor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity February 5, 2012) |
|
of Wood Doors |
|
|
2,666,667 |
|
|
|
2,547,510 |
|
|
|
2,547,510 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 10.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,120 |
|
|
|
87,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,634,630 |
|
|
|
2,634,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Sensor Technologies, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 0.5% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2010) |
|
Commercial/ |
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,404,755 |
|
|
|
3,404,755 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 20.0%) |
|
Industrial Sensors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,454,755 |
|
|
|
4,154,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlton Global Resources, LLC |
|
Processor of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity November 15, 2011) |
|
Industrial Minerals |
|
|
4,687,777 |
|
|
|
4,555,835 |
|
|
|
2,618,421 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 8.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,955,835 |
|
|
|
2,618,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston Plating & Coatings, LLC |
|
Plating & Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity July 19, 2011) |
|
Coating Services |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 11.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
2,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,000 |
|
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KBK Industries, LLC |
|
Specialty Manufacturer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity January 23, 2011) |
|
of Oilfield and |
|
|
3,937,500 |
|
|
|
3,730,881 |
|
|
|
3,730,881 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity July 1, 2009) |
|
Industrial Products |
|
|
623,063 |
|
|
|
623,063 |
|
|
|
623,063 |
|
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt (Maturity January 31, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
686,250 |
|
Member Units (7) (Fully diluted 14.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,616,444 |
|
|
|
5,740,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurus
Healthcare, LP
13% Secured Debt (Maturity May 7, 2009) |
|
Healthcare Facilities |
|
|
3,010,000 |
|
|
|
2,934,625 |
|
|
|
2,934,625 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 18.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,039,625 |
|
|
|
3,649,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Trench Safety, LLC |
|
Trench & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% PIK Debt (Maturity April 16, 2014) |
|
Safety Equipment |
|
|
365,334 |
|
|
|
314,805 |
|
|
|
314,805 |
|
Member Units (Fully diluted 10.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,107,113 |
|
|
|
2,107,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulse Systems, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Secured Debt (Maturity June 1, 2009) |
|
Components for |
|
|
2,307,498 |
|
|
|
2,260,420 |
|
|
|
2,260,420 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 6.6%) |
|
Medical Devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,378,420 |
|
|
|
2,610,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation General, Inc. |
|
Taxi Cab/Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity May 31, 2010) |
|
Services |
|
|
3,600,000 |
|
|
|
3,501,966 |
|
|
|
3,501,966 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 24.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,571,966 |
|
|
|
3,841,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Air Systems, Ltd. |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% Secured Debt (Maturity October 11, 2011) |
|
Chilling Systems |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
905,213 |
|
|
|
905,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vision Interests, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
Installer of Commercial |
|
|
3,760,000 |
|
|
|
3,541,662 |
|
|
|
3,541,662 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 8.9%) |
|
Signage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,000 |
|
|
|
372,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 11.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,073,662 |
|
|
|
4,288,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WorldCall, Inc. |
|
Telecommunication/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Secured Debt (Maturity October 22, 2009) |
|
Information Services |
|
|
782,500 |
|
|
|
745,217 |
|
|
|
745,217 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 6.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,173 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Warrants (Fully diluted 13.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
989,390 |
|
|
|
1,075,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,037,053 |
|
|
|
36,176,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment (1) (2) |
|
Industry |
|
Principal (6) |
|
|
Cost (6) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (5): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Teak Fine Hardwoods, Inc. |
|
Hardwood Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Current/5.5% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity April 13, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
1,651,028 |
|
|
|
1,586,391 |
|
|
|
1,586,391 |
|
Common Stock (Fully diluted 3.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
490,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,391 |
|
|
|
2,076,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support Systems Homes, Inc. |
|
Manages Substance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% Current/4% PIK Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
Abuse Treatment |
|
|
1,525,674 |
|
|
|
1,507,596 |
|
|
|
1,507,596 |
|
8% Secured Debt (Maturity June 5, 2012) |
|
Centers |
|
|
158,888 |
|
|
|
157,014 |
|
|
|
157,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,664,610 |
|
|
|
1,664,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,381,001 |
|
|
|
3,741,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (Investment Manager)
100% of Membership Interests |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
17,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97,471,426 |
|
|
$ |
105,650,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idle Fund Investments |
|
Investments in U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.691% Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note |
|
Agency Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Maturity April 11, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,421,791 |
|
|
$ |
3,421,791 |
|
4.691% Federal National Mortgage Association Discount Note
(Maturity April 2, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,425,490 |
|
|
|
3,425,490 |
|
4.675% Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note
(Maturity March 20, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,431,089 |
|
|
|
3,431,089 |
|
4.668% Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note
(Maturity March 5, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,437,408 |
|
|
|
3,437,408 |
|
4.673% Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Note
(Maturity February 20, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,443,197 |
|
|
|
3,443,197 |
|
4.77% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Discount Note
(Maturity February 7, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,448,948 |
|
|
|
3,448,948 |
|
4.64% Federal National Mortgage Association Discount Note
(Maturity January 23, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
3,455,338 |
|
|
|
3,455,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Idle Fund Investments, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,063,261 |
|
|
$ |
24,063,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All debt investments are income producing. Equity and warrants are non-income producing,
unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
See footnote C for summary geographic location of portfolio companies. |
|
(3) |
|
Control investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (1940
Act), as investments
in which more than 25% of the voting securities are owned or where
the ability to nominate greater than 50% of the board
representation is maintained. |
|
(4) |
|
Affiliate investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in which between 5% and 25%
of the voting
securities are owned. |
|
(5) |
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are
neither Control investments nor
Affiliate investments. |
|
(6) |
|
Net of prepayments and accumulated unearned income. |
|
(7) |
|
Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions. |
12
MAIN STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE A ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
1. Organization
Main
Street Capital Corporation (MSCC) was formed on March 9, 2007, for the purpose of (i)
acquiring 100% of the equity interests of Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP (the Fund) and its
general partner, Main Street Mezzanine Management, LLC (the General Partner), (ii) acquiring 100%
of the equity interests of Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (the Investment Manager), (iii)
raising capital in an initial public offering, which was completed in October 2007 (the
Offering), and (iv) thereafter operating as an internally managed business development company
(BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The transactions
discussed above were consummated in October 2007 and are collectively termed the Formation
Transactions. The term Main Street refers to the Fund and the General Partner prior to the
Offering and to MSCC and its subsidiaries, including the Fund and the General Partner, subsequent
to the Offering.
Immediately following the Formation Transactions, Main Street Equity Interests, Inc. (MSEI)
was created as a wholly owned consolidated subsidiary of MSCC. MSEI has elected for tax purposes to
be treated as a taxable entity and is taxed at normal corporate tax rates based on its taxable
income.
2. Basis of Presentation
Main Streets financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
consolidated financial statements of Main Street include the accounts of MSCC, the Fund, MSEI and
the General Partner. The Formation Transactions involved an exchange of equity interests between
companies under common control. In accordance with the guidance on exchanges of equity interests
between entities under common control contained in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), Main Streets results of operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007, and cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2007, are
presented as if the Formation Transactions had occurred as of January 1, 2007. Main Streets
results of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, and 2007, cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007 and financial positions
as of June 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007, are presented on a consolidated basis. The effects of all intercompany transactions
between Main Street and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. As a result of
adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), in the first quarter of 2008,
certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform with the current
financial statement presentation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Main Street are presented in
conformity with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for
reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures
accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP are omitted. In the
opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial results included herein contain all
adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for the fair
presentation of financial statements for the interim periods included herein. The results of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results to be expected for the full year. Also, the unaudited financial statements and
notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the
year ended December 31, 2007. Financial statements prepared on a U.S. GAAP basis require management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and disclosures reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as
more information becomes known, which could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein.
Under the investment company rules and regulations pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation S-X and
the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies issued by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (the AICPA Guide), Main Street is precluded from consolidating
portfolio company investments, including those in which it has a controlling interest, unless the
portfolio company is another investment company. An exception to this general principle in the
AICPA Guide occurs if Main Street owns a controlled operating company that provides all or
substantially all of its services directly to Main Street or to an investment company of Main
Streets. None of the investments made by Main Street qualify for this exception. Therefore, Main
Streets portfolio investments are carried on the balance sheet at fair value, as discussed further
in note B, with any adjustments to fair value recognized as Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation
(Depreciation) from Investments on the Statement of Operations until the investment is disposed
of, resulting in any gain or loss on exit being recognized as a Net Realized Gain (Loss) from
Investments.
13
Portfolio Investment Classification
Main Street classifies its portfolio investments in accordance with the requirements of the
1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, Control Investments are defined as investments in which Main Street
owns more than 25% of the voting securities or has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board
representation. Under the 1940 Act, Affiliate Investments are defined as investments in which
Main Street owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act,
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined as investments that are neither Control
investments nor Affiliate investments. The Investment in affiliated Investment Manager represents
Main Streets investment in a wholly owned investment manager subsidiary that is accounted for as a
portfolio investment of Main Street.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1. Valuation of Investments
Main Street accounts for its portfolio investments at fair value. As a result, Main Street
adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 in the first quarter
of 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes
a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances
disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. SFAS 157 requires Main Street to assume that
the portfolio investment is to be sold in the principal market to market participants, or in the
absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market.
Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market
that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact. In accordance with SFAS 157,
Main Street has considered its principal market, or the market in which Main Street exits its
portfolio investments with the greatest volume and level of activity. Prior to the adoption of SFAS
157, Main Street reported unearned income as a single line item on the consolidated balance sheets
and consolidated schedule of investments. Upon adoption of SFAS 157,
Main Street changed its balance sheet presentation for all periods to
reclassify unearned income to the associated debt investments. This change in presentation had no impact on the overall
net cost or fair value of Main Streets investment portfolio and had no impact on Main Streets
financial position or results of operations.
Main Streets business plan calls for it to invest primarily in illiquid securities issued by
private companies and/or thinly traded public companies. These investments may be subject to
restrictions on resale and will generally have no established trading market. As a result, Main
Street determines in good faith the fair value of its portfolio investments pursuant to a valuation
policy in accordance with SFAS 157 and a valuation process approved by its Board of Directors and
in accordance with the 1940 Act. Main Street reviews external events, including private mergers,
sales and acquisitions involving comparable companies, and includes this analysis in the valuation
process. Main Streets valuation policy is intended to provide a consistent basis for determining
the fair value of the portfolio.
Control investments are composed of equity and debt securities for which Main Street has the
ability to nominate a majority of the portfolio companys board
of directors. Market quotations are not readily available for Main Streets control investments. As a result, Main Street
determines the fair value of Control investments using a combination of market and income
approaches. Under the market approach, Main Street will typically use the enterprise value
methodology to determine the fair value of these investments. The enterprise value is the fair
value at which an enterprise could be sold in a transaction between two willing parties, other than
through a forced or liquidation sale. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on
multiples of earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows,
net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. There is no single methodology for
estimating enterprise value. For any one portfolio company, enterprise value is generally described
as a range of values from which a single estimate of enterprise value is derived. In estimating the
enterprise value of a portfolio company, Main Street analyzes various factors, including the
portfolio companys historical and projected financial results. Main Street allocates the
enterprise value to these investments in order of the legal priority of the investments. Main
Street will also use the income approach to determine the fair value of these securities, based on
projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio company or the debt
security will likely generate. The valuation approaches for Main Streets control investments
estimate the value of the investment if it were to sell, or exit, the investment, assuming the
highest and best use of the investment by market participants. In addition, these valuation
approaches consider the value associated with Main Streets ability to control the capital
structure of the portfolio company, as well as the timing of a potential exit.
14
Non-control investments are composed of debt and equity securities for which Main Street does
not have a controlling interest, or the ability to nominate a majority of the board of directors,
and for which market quotations for Main Streets non-control investments are not readily
available. For Main Streets non-control equity investments, Main Street primarily uses the market
approach to value its equity investments and the income approach to value its debt instruments. For
non-control debt investments, Main Street determines the fair value primarily using a yield
approach that analyzes the discounted cash flows of interest and principal for the debt security,
as set forth in the associated loan agreements, as well as the financial position and credit risk
of each of these portfolio
investments. Main Streets estimate of the expected repayment date of a debt security is
generally the legal maturity date of the instrument, as Main Street generally intends to hold its
loans to maturity. The yield analysis considers changes in leverage levels, credit quality,
portfolio company performance and other factors. Main Street will use the value determined by the
yield analysis as the fair value for that security; however, because of Main Streets intent to
hold its loans to maturity, the fair value will not exceed the cost of the investment. A change in
the assumptions that Main Street uses to estimate the fair value of its debt securities using the
yield analysis could have a material impact on the determination of fair value. If there is
deterioration in credit quality or a debt security is in workout status, Main Street may consider
other factors in determining the fair value of a debt security, including the value attributable to
the debt security from the enterprise value of the portfolio company or the proceeds that would be
received in a liquidation analysis.
Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, Main Streets estimate of fair value
may differ materially from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the
securities existed. In addition, changes in the market environment, portfolio company performance
and other events that may occur over the lives of the investments may cause the gains or losses
ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuations currently assigned.
Main Street determines the fair value of each individual investment and records changes in fair
value as unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Main Street uses a standard investment ranking system in connection with its investment
oversight, portfolio management/analysis and investment valuation procedures. This system takes
into account both quantitative and qualitative factors of the portfolio company and the investments
held. Each quarter, Main Street estimates the fair value of each portfolio investment, and the
Board of Directors of Main Street oversees, reviews and approves, in good faith, Main Streets fair
value estimates consistent with the 1940 Act requirements.
Duff & Phelps, LLC, an independent valuation firm (Duff & Phelps), has provided third-party
valuation consulting services to Main Street, which consisted of certain mutually agreed limited
procedures that Main Street identified and requested Duff & Phelps to perform (hereinafter referred
to as the Procedures). During 2007, Main Street asked Duff & Phelps to perform the Procedures, at
each quarter end, by reviewing a select number of investments each quarter. By year end, Duff &
Phelps had reviewed a total of 24 portfolio companies comprising approximately 77% of the total
portfolio investments at fair value as of December 31, 2007. The Procedures were performed on
investments in 6 portfolio companies for each quarter ended
March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007,
and
September 30, 2007. For the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Procedures were performed on
investments in 5 portfolio companies. In addition, Duff & Phelps performed the Procedures on the
investment in the Investment Manager at the beginning of 2007. For the six months ended June 30,
2008, the Procedures were performed on investments in 13 portfolio companies comprising
approximately 37% of the total portfolio investments at fair value as of June 30, 2008, with the
Procedures performed on investments in 5 portfolio companies for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008,
and investments in 8 portfolio companies for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Upon completion of
the Procedures in each case, Duff & Phelps concluded that the fair value, as determined by Main
Street, of those investments subjected to the Procedures did not appear to be unreasonable. The
Board of Directors of Main Street is ultimately and solely responsible for overseeing, reviewing
and approving, in good faith, Main Streets estimate of the fair value for the investments.
Main Street
believes its investments as of June 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, approximate
fair value based on the market in which Main Street operates and other conditions in existence at
those reporting periods.
2. Interest and Dividend Income
Main
Street records interest and dividend income on the accrual basis to the extent amounts are
expected to be collected. In accordance with Main Streets
valuation policy, Main Street evaluates accrued interest periodically for collectibility. When a loan or debt security becomes 90 days or more
past due, and if Main Street otherwise does not expect the debtor to be able to service all of its
debt or other obligations, Main Street will generally place the loan or debt security on
non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest income on that loan or debt security until the
borrower has demonstrated the ability and intent to pay contractual amounts due. If a loan or debt
securitys status significantly improves regarding ability to service the debt or other
obligations, or if a loan or debt security is fully impaired or
written off, Main Street will remove it from non-accrual status. Dividend income is recorded as dividends are declared or at the point an
obligation exists for the portfolio company to make a distribution.
Main Street holds debt instruments in its portfolio that contain payment-in-kind (PIK)
interest provisions. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each debt
agreement, is added to the principal balance of the debt and is recorded as interest income. Thus,
the actual collection of this interest may be deferred until the time of debt principal repayment.
As of June 30, 2008, Main Street had two investments on non-accrual status. These investments
comprised approximately 0.9% of the total portfolio investments at fair value as of June 30, 2008
(excluding Main Streets investment in the Investment Manager). As of December 31, 2007, Main
Street had one investment that was on non-accrual status. This investment comprised approximately
3.1%
of the total portfolio investments at fair value as of December 31, 2007 (excluding Main
Streets investment in the Investment Manager).
15
3. Fee Income Structuring and Advisory Services
Main Street may periodically provide services, including structuring and advisory services, to
its portfolio companies. For services that are separately identifiable and evidence exists to
substantiate fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally when the investment or
other applicable transaction closes. Fees received in connection with debt financing transactions
for services that do not meet these criteria are treated as debt origination fees and are accreted
into interest income over the life of the financing.
4. Unearned Income Debt Origination Fees and Original Issue Discount
Main Street capitalizes upfront debt origination fees received in connection with financings
and reflects such fees as unearned income netted against investments. Main Street will also
capitalize and offset direct loan origination costs against the origination fees received. The
unearned income from the fees, net of direct debt origination costs, is accreted into interest income
based on the effective interest method over the life of the financing.
In connection with its debt investments, Main Street sometimes receives nominal cost warrants
(nominal cost equity) that are valued as part of the negotiation process with the particular
portfolio company. When Main Street receives nominal cost equity, Main Street allocates its cost
basis in its investment between its debt securities and its nominal cost equity at the time of
origination. Any resulting discount from recording the debt is reflected as unearned income, which
is netted against the investment and accreted into interest income based on the effective interest
method over the life of the debt.
5. Income Taxes
Main Street intends to qualify and elect for the tax treatment applicable to regulated
investment companies (RIC) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code), and, among other things, intends to make the required distributions to its
stockholders as specified therein. As a RIC, Main Street generally
will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary
income or capital gains that Main Street distributes to its
stockholders as dividends. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, Main Street may
choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax
year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed
through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which
generated such taxable income.
MSCCs wholly owned subsidiary, MSEI, is a taxable entity which holds certain portfolio
investments of Main Street. MSEI is consolidated with Main Street for U.S. GAAP reporting purposes,
and the portfolio investments held by MSEI are included in Main Streets consolidated financial
statements. The purpose of MSEI is to permit Main Street to hold equity investments in portfolio
companies which are pass through entities for tax purposes in order to comply with the source
income requirements contained in the RIC tax provisions of the Code. MSEI is not
consolidated with
Main Street for income tax purposes and may generate income tax
expense as a result of MSEIs
ownership of certain portfolio investments. This income tax expense, if any, is reflected in Main
Streets Consolidated Statement of Operations.
MSEI uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities
and their reported amounts in the financial statements, using statutory tax rates in effect for the
year in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided
against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Prior to the Formation Transactions, Main Street was taxed under the partnership provisions of
the Code. Under these provisions of the Code, the General Partner and limited partners were
responsible for reporting their share of the partnerships income or loss on their income tax
returns.
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to
temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses. Taxable income
generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, as investment gains or losses are
not included in taxable income until they are realized.
16
6. Net Realized Gains or Losses from Investments and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or
Depreciation from Investments
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the sale
or redemption of an investment and the cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized
appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments written-off during the
period net of recoveries. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation from investments
reflects the net change in the valuation of the investment portfolio pursuant to Main Streets
valuation guidelines and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized appreciation or
depreciation on exited investments.
7. Concentration of Credit Risks
Main Street places its cash in financial institutions, and, at times, such balances may be in
excess of the federally insured limit.
8. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities. This FASB Staff Position (FSP) addresses whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be
included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS). This FSP shall be
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted
retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected
financial data) to conform to the provisions of this FSP. Early application is not permitted. Main
Street is currently analyzing the effect, if any, this statement may have on its consolidated
results of operations.
NOTE C FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY AND PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
In connection with valuing portfolio investments, Main Street adopted the provisions of
SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to
measure fair value, and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Main Street
accounts for its portfolio investments at fair value.
Fair Value Hierarchy
In accordance with SFAS 157, Main Street has categorized its portfolio investments, based on
the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The
fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical
investments (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Portfolio investments recorded on Main Streets balance sheet are categorized based on the
inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1 Investments whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets
in an active market that Main Street has the ability to access (examples include investments in
active exchange-traded equity securities and investments in most U.S. government and agency
securities).
Level 2 Investments whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active
or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term
of the investment. Level 2 inputs include the following:
|
|
|
Quoted prices for similar assets in active markets (for example, investments in
restricted stock); |
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets (for example,
investments in thinly traded public companies); |
|
|
|
|
Pricing models whose inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the
investment (for example, market interest rate indices); and |
|
|
|
|
Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from, or corroborated by,
observable market data through correlation or other means for substantially the full
term of the investment. |
Level 3 Investments whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require
inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These
inputs reflect managements own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in
pricing the investment (for example, investments in illiquid securities issued by private
companies).
17
As required by SFAS 157, when the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different
levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based
on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. For
example, a Level 3 fair value measurement may include inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and
2) and unobservable (Level 3). Therefore, gains and losses for such investments categorized within
the Level 3 table below may include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable
inputs (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Main Street conducts reviews of fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis.
Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification for certain
investments. As of June 30, 2008, all of Main Streets investment portfolio consisted of
investments in illiquid securities issued by private companies. The fair value determination for
these investments primarily consisted of unobservable inputs. As a result, all of Main Streets
portfolio investments were categorized as Level 3. The fair value determination of each portfolio
investment required one or more of the following unobservable inputs:
|
|
|
Financial information obtained from each portfolio company, including unaudited
statements of operations and balance sheets for the most recent period available as
compared to budgeted numbers; |
|
|
|
|
Current and projected financial condition of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Current and projected ability of the portfolio company to service its debt
obligations; |
|
|
|
|
Type and amount of collateral, if any, underlying the investment; |
|
|
|
|
Current financial ratios (e.g., fixed charge coverage ratio, interest coverage ratio,
net debt/EBITDA ratio) applicable to the investment; |
|
|
|
|
Current liquidity of the investment and related financial ratios (e.g., current ratio
and quick ratio); |
|
|
|
|
Pending debt or capital restructuring of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Projected operating results of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Current information regarding any offers to purchase the investment; |
|
|
|
|
Current ability of the portfolio company to raise any additional financing as needed; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the economic environment which may have a material impact on the operating
results of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Internal occurrences that may have an impact (both positive and negative) on the
operating performance of the portfolio company; |
|
|
|
|
Qualitative assessment of key management; |
|
|
|
|
Contractual rights, obligations or restrictions associated with the investment; and |
|
|
|
|
Other factors deemed relevant. |
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of Main Streets Level 3
investments for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes from |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Type of |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Accretion of |
|
|
Redemptions/ |
|
|
New |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Investment |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unearned Income |
|
|
Repayments |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
to Realized |
|
|
(Depreciation) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Debt |
|
|
64,581,986 |
|
|
|
595,189 |
|
|
|
(6,575,909 |
) |
|
|
24,206,192 |
|
|
|
(687,263 |
) |
|
|
(2,788,883 |
) |
|
|
79,331,312 |
|
Equity |
|
|
16,361,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,014,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,029,379 |
|
|
|
25,405,646 |
|
Warrant |
|
|
7,082,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
1,621,403 |
|
|
|
(99,154 |
) |
|
|
(451,561 |
) |
|
|
8,077,808 |
|
Investment Manager |
|
|
17,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464,462 |
) |
|
|
17,160,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,650,414 |
|
|
|
595,189 |
|
|
|
(6,650,909 |
) |
|
|
30,842,554 |
|
|
|
(786,417 |
) |
|
|
324,473 |
|
|
|
129,975,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Investments
Main Streets portfolio investments principally consist of secured debt, equity warrants and
direct equity investments in privately held companies. The debt investments are secured by either a
first or second lien on the assets of the portfolio company, generally bear interest at fixed
rates, and generally mature between five and seven years from original investment. Main Street also
receives nominally priced equity warrants and makes direct equity investments, usually in
connection with a debt investment in a portfolio company.
18
As
discussed further in note D, the Investment Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC.
However, the Investment Manager is accounted for as a portfolio investment of Main Street, since it
conducts a meaningful portion of its investment management activities for an entity other than
MSCC or one of its subsidiaries. To allow for more relevant disclosure of Main Streets core
investment portfolio, Main Streets investment in the Investment Manager has been excluded from the
tables and amounts set forth in this note.
Investment income, consisting of interest, dividends and fees, can fluctuate dramatically upon
repayment of a debt investment or sale of an equity interest. Revenue recognition in any given year
could be highly concentrated among several portfolio companies. For the six months ended June 30,
2008, Main Street recorded investment income from one portfolio company in excess of 10% of total
investment income. The investment income from that portfolio company represented approximately 20%
of the total investment income for the period, principally related to high levels of dividend
income and transaction and structuring fees on the new investment in such company. For the six
months ended June 30, 2007, Main Street did not record investment income from any portfolio company
in excess of 10% of total investment income.
As of June 30, 2008, Main Street had debt and equity investments in 31 portfolio companies
with an aggregate fair value of $112,814,766 and a weighted average effective yield on its debt
investments of 13.6%. As of December 31, 2007, Main Street had debt and equity investments in 27
portfolio companies with an aggregate fair value of $88,025,414 and a weighted average effective
yield on its debt investments of 14.3%. The weighted average yields were computed using the
effective interest rates for all debt investments at June 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, including
amortization of deferred debt origination fees and accretion of
original issue discount. At June 30, 2008, the total fair value
of the Main Street portfolio was 108% of the total portfolio at cost.
Summaries of the composition of Main Streets investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a
percentage of total portfolio investments are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
First lien debt |
|
|
81.1 |
% |
|
|
81.5 |
% |
Equity |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Second lien debt |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
First lien debt |
|
|
69.0 |
% |
|
|
70.1 |
% |
Equity |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Second lien debt |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the portfolio composition by geographic region of the United States
at cost and fair value as a percentage of total portfolio investments. The geographic composition
is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
|
31.9 |
% |
West |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
59.2 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
West |
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Streets portfolio investments are generally in lower middle-market companies conducting
business in a variety of industries. Set forth below are tables showing the composition of Main
Streets portfolio by industry at cost and fair value as of
June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Industrial equipment |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Precast concrete manufacturing |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Agricultural services |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Electronics manufacturing |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Custom wood products |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Retail |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Mining and minerals |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Health care products |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Transportation/logistics |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Metal fabrication |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Health care services |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Equipment rental |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Infrastructure products |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Information services |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Industrial services |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Precast concrete manufacturing |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Industrial equipment |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Electronics manufacturing |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Mining and minerals |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Agricultural services |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Retail |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Health care products |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Transportation/logistics |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Custom wood products |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Metal fabrication |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Health care services |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Industrial services |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Equipment rental |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Infrastructure products |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Information services |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
At June 30, 2008, Main Street had one investment that was greater than 10% of its total
investment portfolio at fair value. That investment represented
approximately 13.8% of the
portfolio at fair value. At December 31, 2007, Main Street had one investment that was greater than
10% of its total investment portfolio at fair value. That investment represented approximately
10.5% of the portfolio at fair value.
NOTE D WHOLLY OWNED INVESTMENT MANAGER
As part of the Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager became a wholly owned subsidiary
of MSCC. However, the Investment Manager is accounted for as a portfolio investment of Main Street,
since the Investment Manager conducts a significant portion of its investment management activities
for Main Street Capital II, LP (MSC II), a separate SBIC fund, which is not part of MSCC or one
of its subsidiaries. The investment in the Investment Manager is accounted for using fair value
accounting, with the fair value determined by Main Street and approved, in good faith, by Main
Streets Board of Directors, based on the same valuation methodologies applied to determine the
original $18 million valuation. The original valuation for the Investment Manager was based on the
estimated present value of the net cash flows received for investment management services provided
to MSC II, over the estimated dollar averaged life of the related management contract, and was also
based on comparable public market transactions. Any change in fair value is recognized on Main
Streets statement of operations as Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in Investment in
affiliated Investment Manager, with a corresponding increase (in the case of appreciation) or
decrease (in the case of depreciation) to Investment in affiliated Investment Manager on Main
Streets balance sheet. Main Street believes that the valuation for the Investment Manager will
decrease over the life of the management contract with MSC II, absent obtaining additional future
recurring cash flows from performing investment management activities for other external investment
entities.
The Investment Manager has elected, for tax purposes, to be treated as a taxable entity and is
taxed at normal corporate tax rates based on its taxable income. The taxable income of the
Investment Manager may differ from its book income due to temporary book and tax timing
differences, as well as permanent differences. The Investment Manager provides for any current
taxes payable and deferred tax items in its separate financial statements.
MSCC has a support services agreement with the Investment Manager. As a wholly owned
subsidiary of MSCC, the Investment Manager manages the day-to-day operational and investment
activities of Main Street. The Investment Manager pays normal operating and administrative
expenses, except those specifically required to be borne by MSCC, which principally include direct
costs that are specific to MSCCs status as a publicly traded entity. The expenses paid by the
Investment Manager include the cost of salaries and related benefits, rent, equipment and other
administrative costs required for Main Streets day-to-day operations.
Subsequent to the Formation Transactions and the Offering, the Investment Manager is
reimbursed for its excess expenses associated with providing investment management and other
services to MSCC and its subsidiaries, as well as MSC II. Each quarter, as part of the support
services agreement, MSCC makes payments to cover all expenses incurred by the Investment Manager,
less the recurring management fees that the Investment Manager receives from MSC II, pursuant to a
long-term investment advisory services agreement.
Summarized financial information for the Investment Manager is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
104,514 |
|
|
$ |
129,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
104,514 |
|
|
$ |
129,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities** |
|
$ |
249,087 |
|
|
$ |
274,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
249,087 |
|
|
$ |
274,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
fee income from MSC II |
|
$ |
1,662,600 |
|
Compensation and other administrative expenses (net of reimbursement by MSCC) |
|
|
(1,662,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Includes $58,095 and $207,783 as of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, due to
MSCC. |
21
Prior to the
Formation Transactions and the Offering, the Fund had a management agreement with
the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager managed the day-to-day operational and investment
activities of the Fund, paying similar types of operating expenses as noted in the support services
agreement with MSCC. Management fees paid by the Fund to the Investment Manager for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007, were $499,979 and $999,958, respectively. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, the net excess expenses reimbursed by MSCC to the Investment Manager in
connection with the support services agreement were $218,171 and $444,738, respectively.
NOTE E SBIC DEBENTURES
SBIC debentures payable at June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, were $55 million. SBIC
debentures provide for interest to be paid semi-annually, with principal due at the applicable
10-year maturity date. The weighted average interest rate as of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
was 5.7806%. The first principal maturity due under the existing SBIC debentures is during 2013, and the weighted average maturity for all SBIC debentures is 6.9 years from June 30, 2008. Main
Street is subject to regular compliance examinations by the SBA. There have been no historical
findings resulting from these examinations.
NOTE F REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT
On December 31, 2007, Main Street entered into a Treasury Secured Revolving Credit Agreement
(the Credit Agreement) among Main Street, Wachovia Bank, National Association, and Branch Banking
and Trust Company (BB&T), as administrative agent for the lenders. Under the Credit Agreement,
the lenders have agreed to extend revolving loans to Main Street in an amount not to exceed $100
million. The purpose of the Credit Agreement is to provide flexibility in the sizing of portfolio
investments and to facilitate the growth of Main Streets investment portfolio. The Credit
Agreement has a two-year term and bears interest, at Main Streets option, either (i) at the LIBOR
rate or (ii) at a published prime rate of interest, plus 25 basis points in either case. The
applicable interest rates under the Credit Agreement would be increased by 15 basis points if usage
under the Credit Agreement is in excess of 50% of the days within a given calendar quarter. The
Credit Agreement also requires payment of 15 basis points per annum in unused commitment fees based
on the average daily unused balances under the facility. The Credit Agreement is secured
by certain securities accounts maintained by BB&T and is also guaranteed by the Investment Manager.
As of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, Main Street had no outstanding borrowings under the
Credit Agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, interest expense and unused commitment
fees incurred under the Credit Agreement totaled $3,819 and $76,146, respectively.
NOTE G FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights are prepared in accordance with the guidance for exchanges of equity
interests between entities under common control contained in SFAS 141, with the 2007 ratios and per
share amounts calculated as if the Formation Transactions and the Offering had occurred as of
January 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Per Share Data: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net asset value at beginning of period |
|
$ |
12.85 |
|
|
$ |
5.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (1) |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
Net realized gains (1) (2) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments (1) (2) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
Income tax benefit (1) |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations (1) |
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
Net decrease in net assets from dividends paid to stockholders |
|
|
(0.69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from distributions to partners, net of contributions (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at June 30, 2008 and 2007 |
|
$ |
13.02 |
|
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
11.82 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Shares outstanding at June 30, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
8,959,718 |
|
|
|
8,526,726 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. |
|
(2) |
|
Net realized gains and net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation can
fluctuate significantly from period to period. |
|
(3) |
|
Capital contributions totaled $47,465. |
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net assets at end of period |
|
$ |
116,759,735 |
|
|
$ |
41,842,867 |
|
Average net assets |
|
|
86,343,108 |
|
|
|
42,201,743 |
|
Average outstanding debt |
|
|
55,000,000 |
|
|
|
51,700,000 |
|
Ratio of total expenses, excluding interest expense, to average net assets (3)(4) |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
4.42 |
% |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets (3)(4) |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
8.09 |
% |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (3)(4) |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.07 |
% |
Total return
based on change in net asset value (1)(2)(3)(4) |
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
|
7.19 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total return based on change in net asset value was calculated using the sum of ending net asset value plus
distributions to stockholders and/or members and partners during the period less capital contributions during the
period, divided by the beginning net asset value. |
|
(2) |
|
For the periods prior to the Formation Transactions, this ratio combines the total return for both the managing
investors (the General Partner) and the non-managing investors (limited partners). |
|
(3) |
|
Not annualized. |
|
(4) |
|
2007 amounts include professional costs related to the IPO. |
NOTE H DIVIDEND, DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXABLE INCOME
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, Main Streets Board of Directors declared
dividends of approximately $6.2 million, or $0.69 per share of common stock. The determination of
the tax attributes of Main Streets distributions is made annually, based upon its taxable income
for the full year and distributions paid for the full year. Therefore, a determination made on an interim period basis may not be representative of the actual tax attributes of distributions for a
full year. Main Streets estimates for the tax attributes of its distributions for the full year 2008 allocate approximately 45% of such distributions to ordinary income, 40% to long-term
capital gains and 15% to short-term capital gains. There can be no assurance that this
estimate is representative of the final tax attributes of Main Streets 2008 distributions to
its stockholders. Ordinary dividend distributions from a RIC do not qualify for the 15% maximum tax
rate on dividend income from domestic corporations and qualified foreign corporations, except to
the extent that the RIC received the income in the form of qualifying dividends from domestic
corporations and qualified foreign corporations (which Main Street did not receive during the
year-to-date period of 2008).
Main Street intends to elect to be treated as a RIC on its 2007 and 2008 tax returns. As a
RIC, Main Street generally will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary
income or capital gains that Main Street distributes to its stockholders as dividends. Main Street has distributed and currently intends to
distribute sufficient dividends to qualify as a RIC. As part of maintaining RIC status, taxable
income (subject to a 4% excise tax) pertaining to a given fiscal year may be
distributed up to 12 months subsequent to the end of that fiscal year, provided such dividends
are declared prior to the filing of Main Streets federal income tax return.
23
One of Main Streets wholly owned subsidiaries, MSEI, is a taxable entity which holds certain
portfolio investments for Main Street. MSEI is consolidated with Main Street, and the portfolio
investments held by MSEI are included in Main Streets consolidated financial statements. The
purpose of MSEI is to permit Main Street to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which
are pass through entities for tax purposes in order to comply with the source income
requirements contained in the RIC tax provisions of the Code. MSEI is not consolidated with Main
Street for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as a result of its ownership of
various portfolio investments. This income tax expense, if any, is reflected in Main Streets
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Listed below is a reconciliation of Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations to
taxable income and to total distributions to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
7,690,732 |
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments not taxable until realized |
|
|
461,944 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(2,351,636 |
) |
Pre-tax income of taxable subsidiary, MSEI, not consolidated for tax purposes |
|
|
(1,073,542 |
) |
Book income and tax income differences, including debt origination and structuring fees and realized gains |
|
|
1,643,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income |
|
|
6,371,397 |
|
Taxable income earned in prior year and carried forward for distribution in current year |
|
|
1,445,059 |
|
Taxable income earned in current quarter and carried forward for distribution |
|
|
(1,634,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to common stockholders |
|
$ |
6,182,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Formation Transactions, the Fund was taxed under the partnership provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code. Under these provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the General Partner
and limited partners are responsible for reporting their share of the partnerships income or loss
on their income tax returns. Listed below is a reconciliation of Net Increase in Members Equity
and Partners Capital Resulting from Operations to taxable income for the six months ended June 30,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in members equity and partners capital resulting from operations |
|
$ |
3,110,371 |
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation from investments |
|
|
(372,404 |
) |
Accrual basis to cash basis adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
Deferred debt origination fees included in taxable income |
|
|
197,711 |
|
Accretion of unearned fee income for book income |
|
|
(412,929 |
) |
Net change in interest receivable |
|
|
31,828 |
|
Net change in interest payable |
|
|
(161,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Taxable income |
|
$ |
2,392,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE I DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
Main Street maintains a dividend reinvestment plan (the DRIP) that provides for the reinvestment
of dividends on behalf of its stockholders, unless a stockholder has elected to receive dividends
in cash. As a result, if Main Street declares a cash dividend, the companys stockholders who have
not opted out of the DRIP by the dividend record date will have their cash dividend automatically
reinvested into additional shares of MSCC common stock. Main Street has the option to satisfy the
share requirements of the DRIP through the issuance of shares of common stock or through open
market purchases of common stock by the DRIP plan administrator. Newly issued shares will be valued
based upon the final closing price of MSCCs common stock on the valuation date determined by Main
Streets Board of Directors. Shares purchased in the open market to satisfy the DRIP requirements
will be valued based upon the average price of the applicable shares purchased by the DRIP plan
administrator, before any associated brokerage or other costs. For
the six months ended June 30, 2008, $2,362,437 of the total $6,182,205 in dividends paid to
stockholders represented DRIP participation and 174,781 shares of common stock were purchased in
the open market to satisfy the DRIP participation requirements. For the year ended December 31,
2007, $1,903,116 of the total $2,912,820 in dividends paid to stockholders represented DRIP
participation and 132,992 shares of common stock were issued to satisfy the DRIP participation
requirements. The shares disclosed above relate only to Main Streets DRIP and exclude any activity
related to broker-managed dividend reinvestment plans.
24
NOTE J SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
Listed below are the supplemental cash flow disclosures for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,627,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,295,257 |
|
Taxes paid |
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
NOTE K RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Main Street co-invested with MSC II in several existing portfolio investments prior to the
Offering, but did not co-invest with MSC II subsequent to the Offering and prior to June 2008. In
June 2008, Main Street received exemptive relief from the SEC to allow Main Street to resume
co-investing with MSC II. MSC II is managed by the Investment Manager, and the Investment Manager
is wholly owned by MSCC. MSC II is an SBIC fund with similar investment objectives to Main Street
and which began its investment operations in January 2006. The co-investments among Main Street and
MSC II had all been made at the same time and on the same terms and conditions. The co-investments
were also made in accordance with the Investment Managers conflicts policy and in accordance with
the applicable SBIC conflict of interest regulations.
As discussed further in note D, Wholly Owned Investment Manager, Main Street paid certain
management fees to the Investment Manager during the year ended December 31, 2007. Subsequent to
the Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager is a wholly owned portfolio company of Main
Street. At June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the Investment Manager had a payable of $58,095
and $207,783, respectively, due to MSCC related to the funding of recurring administrative expenses
required to support MSCCs business.
NOTE L SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 1, 2008, Main Streets Board of Directors approved the issuance of 245,645 shares of
restricted stock to Main Street employees pursuant to the Main Street Capital Corporation 2008
Equity Incentive Plan. These shares will vest over a four-year period from the grant date and will
be expensed over a four-year service period starting on the grant date.
On July 1, 2008, a total of 20,000 shares of restricted stock was issued to Main Streets
independent directors pursuant to the Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director
Restricted Stock Plan. One-half of those shares vested immediately on the grant date, and the
remaining half will vest on the day immediately preceding the next annual meeting at which Main
Street stockholders elect directors, provided that these independent directors have been in
continuous service as members of the Board through such date. As a result, 50% of those shares were
expensed during July 2008 with the remaining 50% to be expensed over a one-year service period
starting on the grant date.
On July 11, 2008, Main Street sold substantially all the assets of portfolio company TA
Acquisition Group, LP (Travis Aggregates) to a subsidiary of Texas Industries, Inc. (NYSE:
TXI). Main Street realized a $6.4 million gain, including structuring and advisory fees, related
to the sale. The net sale proceeds received by Main Street related to its equity interests in
Travis Aggregates were approximately 19 times Main Streets original equity investment of $0.4
million. Main Street recognized a total compounded annual rate of return over the term of its
investment in Travis Aggregates of approximately 56%, including interest, dividends, fees and the
gain realized on the sale of assets.
On July 31, 2008, Main Street declared a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. The quarterly dividend will
be payable on September 12, 2008, to stockholders of record on August 14, 2008. The ex-dividend date
for this quarterly dividend will be August 12, 2008.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Main Street will begin paying dividends to its shareholders
on a monthly basis instead of paying such dividends on a quarterly basis. Main Street anticipates
declaring per share monthly dividends during the fourth quarter of 2008 in the range of $0.12 to $0.125 per
month, or in the range of $0.36 to $0.375 per share for the entire fourth quarter of 2008. The anticipated
dividend range for the fourth quarter of 2008 represents a 9% to 14% increase from the per share dividend
paid in the fourth quarter of 2007. The projected dividend ranges for the fourth quarter of 2008
coupled with the dividends declared or paid to date during 2008 equate to a range of $1.41 to
$1.425 per share for the total 2008 calendar year dividends. These projected dividend ranges are based upon
Main Streets current estimate of total 2008 taxable income and anticipated portfolio activity.
25
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Please see Risk Factors and Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on March
21, 2008, for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these
statements. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements
and related notes and other financial information included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
ORGANIZATION
Main Street Capital Corporation (MSCC) was formed on March 9, 2007, for the purpose of (i)
acquiring 100% of the equity interests of Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP (the Fund) and its
general partner, Main Street Mezzanine Management, LLC (the General Partner), (ii) acquiring 100%
of the equity interests of Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (the Investment Manager), (iii)
raising capital in an initial public offering, which was completed in October 2007 (the
Offering), and (iv) thereafter operating as an internally managed business development company
(BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The transactions
discussed above were consummated in October 2007 and are collectively termed the Formation
Transactions. Immediately following the Formation Transactions, Main Street Equity Interests, Inc.
(MSEI) was created as a wholly owned consolidated subsidiary of MSCC. MSEI has elected for tax
purposes to be treated as a taxable entity and is taxed at normal corporate tax rates based on its
taxable income. Unless otherwise noted or the context otherwise indicates, the terms we, us,
our and Main Street refer to the Fund and the General Partner prior to the Offering and to MSCC
and its subsidiaries, including the Fund and the General Partner, subsequent to the Offering.
OVERVIEW
We are a principal investment firm focused on providing customized debt and equity financing
to lower middle-market companies, which we define as companies with annual revenues between $10.0
and $100.0 million that operate in diverse industries. We invest primarily in secured debt
instruments, equity investments, warrants and other securities of lower middle-market companies
based in the United States. Our principal investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total
return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our
equity-related investments. Our investments generally range in size from $2.0 million to $15.0
million. We seek to fill the current financing gap for lower middle-market businesses, which have
limited access to financing from commercial banks and other traditional sources. The underserved
nature of the lower middle market creates the opportunity for us to meet the financing needs of
lower middle-market companies while also negotiating favorable transaction terms and equity
participations. Our ability to invest across a companys capital structure, from senior secured
loans to equity securities, allows us to offer portfolio companies a comprehensive suite of
financing solutions, or one stop financing.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (U.S. GAAP). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007, the
consolidated financial statements of Main Street include the accounts of MSCC, the Fund, MSEI and
the General Partner. The Formation Transactions involved an exchange of equity interests between
companies under common control. In accordance with the guidance on exchanges of equity interests
between entities under common control contained in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), Main Streets results of operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007, are
presented as if the Formation Transactions had occurred as of January 1, 2007. Main Streets
results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007, cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007 and financial positions as of June 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007, are presented on a consolidated basis. The effects of all intercompany transactions
between Main Street and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. As a result of
adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), in the first quarter of 2008,
certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform with the current
financial statement presentation.
26
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Main Street are presented in
conformity with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for
reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of our management, the unaudited consolidated
financial results included herein contain all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring
accruals considered necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim
periods included herein. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year. Also, the
unaudited financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with our audited financial
statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007. Financial statements prepared on
a U.S. GAAP basis require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and
disclosures reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and
assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known, which could impact the
amounts reported and disclosed herein.
Under the investment company rules and regulations pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation S-X and
the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies issued by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (the AICPA Guide), we are precluded from consolidating portfolio
company investments, including those in which we have a controlling interest, unless the portfolio
company is another investment company. An exception to this general principle in the AICPA Guide
occurs if we own a controlled operating company that provides all or substantially all of its
services directly to us, or to an investment company of ours. None of the investments made by us
qualify for this exception. Therefore, our portfolio investments are carried on the balance sheet
at fair value, as discussed further in note B to our consolidated financial statements, with any
adjustments to fair value recognized as Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) from
Investments on our Statement of Operations until the investment is disposed of, resulting in any
gain or loss on exit being recognized as a Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Investments.
Investment Valuation
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our financial statements is the
valuation of our portfolio investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and
depreciation. As of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, approximately 75% and 60%, respectively,
of our total assets represented investments in portfolio companies valued at fair value (including
the investment in the Investment Manager). We are required to report our investments at fair value.
We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157, in the first
quarter of 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value,
establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value, and
enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements.
Our business plan calls for us to invest primarily in illiquid securities issued by private
companies and/or thinly traded public companies. These investments may be subject to restrictions
on resale and will generally have no established trading market. As a result, we determine in good
faith the fair value of our portfolio investments pursuant to a valuation policy in accordance with
SFAS 157 and a valuation process approved by our Board of Directors and in accordance with the 1940
Act. We review external events, including private mergers and acquisitions involving comparable
companies, and include this analysis in the valuation process. Our valuation policy is intended to
provide a consistent basis for determining the fair value of the portfolio.
Control investments are composed of equity and debt securities for which we have the ability
to nominate a majority of the portfolio companys board of directors. Market quotations are not
readily available for our control investments. As a result, we determine the fair value of control investments using a combination of market and income approaches. Under the market approach, we
will typically use the enterprise value methodology to determine the fair value of these
investments. The enterprise value is the fair value at which an enterprise could be sold in a
transaction between two willing parties, other than through a forced or liquidation sale.
Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before income
taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited
cases, book value. There is no single methodology for estimating enterprise value. For any one
portfolio company, enterprise value is generally described as a range of values from which a single
estimate of enterprise value is derived. In estimating the enterprise value of a portfolio company,
we analyze various factors, including the portfolio companys historical and projected financial
results. We allocate the enterprise value to these investments in order of the legal priority of
the investments. We will also use the income approach to determine the fair value of these
securities, based on projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio
company or the debt security will likely generate. The valuation approaches for our control
investments estimate the value of the investment if we were to sell, or exit, the investment,
assuming the highest and best use of the investment by market participants. In addition, these
valuation approaches consider the value associated with our ability to control the capital
structure of the portfolio company, as well as the timing of a potential exit.
27
Non-control
investments are composed of debt and equity securities for which we do not have a
controlling interest, or the ability to nominate a majority of the board of directors, and for
which market quotations for our non-control investments are not readily available. For our
non-control equity investments, we primarily use the market approach to value our equity investments and the
income approach to value our debt instruments. For non-control debt investments, we determine the
fair value, primarily using a yield approach that analyzes the discounted cash flows of interest
and principal for the debt security, as set forth in the associated loan
agreements, as well as the financial position and credit risk of each of these portfolio
investments. Our estimate of the expected repayment date of a debt security is generally the legal
maturity date of the instrument as we intend to hold our loans to maturity. The yield analysis
considers changes in leverage levels, credit quality, portfolio company performance and other
factors. We will use the value determined by the yield analysis as the fair value for that
security; however, because of our intent to hold our loans to maturity, the fair value will not
exceed the cost of the investment. A change in the assumptions that we use to estimate the fair
value of our debt securities using the yield analysis could have a material impact on the
determination of fair value. If there is deterioration in credit quality or a debt security is in
workout status, we may consider other factors in determining the fair value of a debt security,
including the value attributable to the debt security from the enterprise value of the portfolio
company or the proceeds that would be received in a liquidation analysis.
Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, our estimate of fair value may
differ materially from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities
existed. In addition, changes in the market environment, portfolio company performance and other
events that may occur over the lives of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately
realized on these investments to be different than the valuations currently assigned. We determine
the fair value of each individual investment and record changes in fair value as unrealized
appreciation or depreciation.
Revenue Recognition
Interest and Dividend Income
We record interest and dividend income on the accrual basis to the extent amounts are expected
to be collected. In accordance with our valuation policy, we evaluate accrued interest periodically
for collectibility. When a loan or debt security becomes 90 days or more past due, and if we
otherwise do not expect the debtor to be able to service all of its debt or other obligations, we
will generally place the loan or debt security on non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest
income on that loan or debt security until the borrower has demonstrated the ability and intent to
pay contractual amounts due. If a loan or debt securitys status significantly improves regarding
ability to service the debt or other obligations, or if a loan or debt security is fully impaired
or written off, we will remove it from non-accrual status. Dividend income is recorded as dividends
are declared or at the point an obligation exists for the portfolio company to make a distribution.
Fee Income
We may periodically provide services, including structuring and advisory services, to our
portfolio companies. For services that are separately identifiable and evidence exists to
substantiate fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally when the investment or
other applicable transaction closes. Fees received in connection with debt financing transactions
for services that do not meet these criteria are treated as debt origination fees, net of direct
loan origination costs, and are amortized, based on the effective interest method, as additional
interest income over the life of the related debt investment.
Payment-in-Kind (PIK) Interest
While not significant to our total debt investment portfolio, we currently hold several loans
in our portfolio that contain PIK interest provisions. The PIK interest, computed at the
contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan
and recorded as interest income. To maintain RIC tax treatment (as discussed below), this non-cash
source of income will need to be paid out to stockholders in the form of distributions, even though
we may not have collected the cash. We will stop accruing PIK interest and write off any accrued
and uncollected interest when it is determined that PIK interest is
no longer collectible. For the six months ended June 30, 2007,
PIK interest, net of PIK interest collected during that period, was
$223,439.
Income Taxes
We intend to
qualify and elect for the tax treatment applicable to a RIC under Subchapter M of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and, among other things, intend to make
the required distributions to our stockholders as specified therein. As a RIC, we generally will
not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we
distribute to our stockholders as dividends. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may
choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax
year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed
through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which
generated such taxable income.
28
MSCCs wholly owned subsidiary, MSEI, is a taxable entity which holds certain of our portfolio
investments. MSEI is consolidated with Main Street for U.S. GAAP reporting purposes, and the
portfolio investments held by MSEI are included in our consolidated financial statements. The
purpose of MSEI is to permit us to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which are
pass
through entities for tax purposes in order to comply with the source income
requirements
contained in the RIC tax provisions of the Code. MSEI is not consolidated with Main Street for income tax
purposes and may generate income tax expense as a result of MSEIs ownership of certain portfolio
investments. This income tax expense, if any, is reflected in our consolidated statement of
operations.
MSEI uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities
and their reported amounts in the financial statements, using statutory tax rates in effect for the
year in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided
against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized.
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio investments principally consist of secured debt, equity warrants and direct equity
investments in privately held companies. The debt investments are secured by either a first or
second lien on the assets of the portfolio company, generally bear interest at fixed rates, and
generally mature between five and seven years from original investment. We also receive nominally
priced equity warrants and make direct equity investments, usually in connection with a debt
investment in a portfolio company.
The Investment Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC. However, the Investment Manager
is accounted for as a portfolio investment of Main Street, since it conducts a meaningful portion
of its investment management activities for an entity other than MSCC or one of its subsidiaries. To allow for more
relevant disclosure of our core investment portfolio, our investment in the Investment Manager has
been excluded from the tables and amounts set forth below.
Summaries of the composition of our investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a
percentage of total portfolio investments are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
First lien debt |
|
|
81.1 |
% |
|
|
81.5 |
% |
Equity |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Second lien debt |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
First lien debt |
|
|
69.0 |
% |
|
|
70.1 |
% |
Equity |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Second lien debt |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the portfolio composition by geographic region of the United States
at cost and fair value as a percentage of total portfolio investments. The geographic composition
is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
|
31.9 |
% |
West |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Southwest |
|
|
59.2 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
West |
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Southeast |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Midwest |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Streets portfolio investments are generally in lower middle-market companies conducting
business in a variety of industries. Set forth below are tables showing the composition of Main
Streets portfolio by industry at cost and fair value as of
June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cost: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Industrial equipment |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Precast concrete manufacturing |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Agricultural services |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Electronics manufacturing |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Custom wood products |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Retail |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Mining and minerals |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Health care products |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Transportation/logistics |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Metal fabrication |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Health care services |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Equipment rental |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Infrastructure products |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Information services |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Industrial services |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fair Value: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Precast concrete manufacturing |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Industrial equipment |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Electronics manufacturing |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Mining and minerals |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Agricultural services |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Retail |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Health care products |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Transportation/logistics |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Custom wood products |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Metal fabrication |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Health care services |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Industrial services |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Equipment rental |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Infrastructure products |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Information services |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Our portfolio investments carry a number of risks including, but not limited to: (1) investing
in lower middle-market companies which have a limited operating history and financial resources;
(2) holding investments that are not publicly traded and which may be subject to legal and other
restrictions on resale; and (3) other risks common to investing in below investment grade debt and
equity investments in private, smaller companies.
PORTFOLIO ASSET QUALITY
We utilize an internally developed investment rating system for our entire portfolio of
investments. Investment Rating 1 represents a portfolio company that is performing in a manner
which significantly exceeds our original expectations and projections. Investment Rating 2
represents a portfolio company that, in general, is performing above our original expectations.
Investment Rating 3 represents a portfolio company that is generally performing in accordance with
our original expectations. Investment Rating 4 represents a portfolio company that is
underperforming our original expectations. Investments with such a rating require increased Main
Street monitoring and scrutiny. Investment Rating 5 represents a portfolio company that is
significantly underperforming. Investments with such a rating require heightened levels of Main
Street monitoring and scrutiny and involve the recognition of unrealized depreciation on such
investment.
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on our 1 to 5 investment rating
scale at fair value as of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007 (excluding Main Streets investment
in the Investment Manager):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Investment |
|
at |
|
|
Total of |
|
|
at |
|
|
Total of |
|
Rating |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
1 |
|
$ |
35,565 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
$ |
24,619 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
2 |
|
|
42,584 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
35,068 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
3 |
|
|
31,616 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
24,034 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
4 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
112,815 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
88,025 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based upon our
investment rating system, the weighted average rating of our portfolio as of
June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, was approximately 2.0 and 2.2, respectively.
As of June 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, we had two and one, respectively,
debt investments representing 0.9%
and 3.1%, respectively, of total portfolio fair value which were on non-accrual status.
In the event that the United States economy enters into a prolonged period of weakness, it is
possible that the financial results of small- to mid-sized companies, similar to those in which we
invest, could experience deterioration, which could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting debt
service requirements and an increase in defaults. In addition, the end markets for certain of our
portfolio companys products and services have experienced, and may continue to experience,
negative economic trends. While we are not seeing signs of an overall, broad deterioration in our
portfolio company results at this time, we can provide no assurance that the performance of certain
of our portfolio companies will not be negatively impacted by these economic or other conditions
which could have a negative impact on our future results.
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Comparison
of three months ended June 30, 2008, and June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Net Change |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Total Investment Income |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Total Expenses |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Investments |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Income |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation
(Depreciation) from Investments |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
NA |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
|
237 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Investment Income
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, total investment income was $4.2 million, a $1.1
million, or 33%, increase over the $3.1 million of total investment income for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. The increase was attributable to a $1.1 million increase in interest, fee and
dividend income from investments which was primarily due to (i) higher average levels of
outstanding debt investments, which was principally due to the closing of seven new debt
investments since June 30, 2007, partially offset by debt repayments received during the same
period, (ii) higher levels of cash dividend income from portfolio equity investments, and (iii)
higher levels of fee income from the closing of new investments during the three months ended June
30, 2008, as compared to the comparable period of 2007.
Expenses
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, total expenses decreased by approximately $0.6
million, or 27%, to approximately $1.6 million from $2.2 million for the three months ended June
30, 2007. The decrease in total expenses was primarily attributable to $0.7 million of professional
costs related to the initial public offering incurred during the comparable period of 2007 offset
by a $0.1 million increase in interest expense as a result of the additional $9.9 million of SBIC
Debentures borrowed during 2007. In addition, general and administrative expenses increased $0.5
million, primarily attributable to an increase in personnel and related costs, as well as
administration costs associated with being a public company. However, Main Street incurred no
management fee expenses due to its internally managed structure after the initial public offering
during the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $0.5 million in the corresponding period in
2007.
Net Investment Income
Net investment
income for the three months ended June 30, 2008, was $2.6 million, or a 166%
increase, compared to net investment income of $0.9 million during the three months
ended June 30,
2007. The increase in net investment income was attributable to the increase in total investment
income and the decrease in total expenses as discussed above.
Net Realized Income
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the net realized gains from investments was $0.1
million, representing a $0.2 million increase over the net realized losses of $0.1 million during
the three months ended June 30, 2007. The net realized gains during the three months ended June 30,
2008, principally related to a realized gain on the partial sale of one equity warrant investment,
compared to the realized loss on one equity investment during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The
higher net realized gains in the three months ended June 30, 2008, and the higher net
investment income during that period resulted in a $1.9 million, or 227%, increase, in the net
realized income for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the corresponding period in
2007.
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a net change in unrealized
depreciation in the amount of $0.8 million, or a $1.3 million decrease, compared to the $0.5
million in net change in unrealized appreciation for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The net
change in unrealized depreciation for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, included (i) unrealized
depreciation on three investments in portfolio companies totaling $2.5 million partially offset by
$2.0 million in unrealized appreciation recognized on
nine portfolio investments, (ii) the reclassification of $0.1 million of previously recognized
unrealized gains into realized gains on one exited investment, and (iii) unrealized depreciation of
$0.2 million related to the Investment Manager.
32
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized a cumulative income tax benefit of
$2.6 million, primarily consisting of non cash deferred tax benefits related to net unrealized
losses from certain portfolio investments transferred into MSEI, our wholly owned taxable
subsidiary. We do not anticipate incurring this level of deferred tax benefit in future periods.
As a result of these events, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations during
the three months ended June 30, 2008, was $4.5 million, or a 237% increase compared to a net
increase in net assets resulting from operations of $1.3 million during the three months ended June
30, 2007.
Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2008, and June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Net Change |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Total Investment Income |
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
Total Expenses |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Net Realized Gains from Investments |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Income |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation
(Depreciation) from Investments |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
NA |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
147 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, total investment income was $8.2 million, a $2.7
million, or 48%, increase over the $5.5 million of total investment income for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. The increase was attributable to a $2.2 million increase in interest, fee and
dividend income from investments and a $0.5 million increase in interest income from idle funds,
which was principally earned on the remaining proceeds from our initial public offering. The
increase in interest, fee and dividend income was primarily attributable to (i) higher average
levels of outstanding debt investments, which was principally due to the closing of seven new debt
investments since June 30, 2007, partially offset by debt repayments received during the same
period, (ii) higher levels of cash dividend income from portfolio equity investments, and (iii)
higher levels of fee income from the closing of new investments for the six months ended June 30,
2008, as compared to the comparable period of 2007.
Expenses
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, total expenses decreased by approximately $0.3
million, or 9%, to approximately $3.1 million from $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007. The decrease in total expenses was primarily attributable to $0.7 million of professional
costs related to the initial public offering incurred during the comparable period of 2007 offset
by a $0.2 million increase in interest expense as a result of
costs related to the U.S. Treasury-based line of credit. In addition, general and administrative expenses increased $1.2
million, primarily attributable to an increase in personnel and related costs, as well as
administration costs associated with being a public company. However, Main Street incurred no
management fee expenses due to its internally managed structure after the initial public offering
during the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $1.0 million in the corresponding period in
2007.
Net Investment Income
Net investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2008, was $5.1 million, or a 138%
increase, compared to net investment income of $2.1 million during the six months ended June 30,
2007. The increase in net investment income was attributable to the increase in total investment
income and the decrease in total expenses discussed above.
33
Net Realized Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the net realized gains from investments was $0.7
million, representing a $0.1 million, or a 19% increase over the net realized gains of $0.6 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2007. The net realized gains during the six months ended June
30, 2008, principally related to the realized gains on the sale of two equity warrant investments,
compared to realized gains or losses recognized on equity investments in three portfolio companies
during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The higher net realized gains in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the higher net
investment income during that period, resulted in a $3.1 million, or 112%, increase in the net
realized income for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the corresponding period in
2007.
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations
During the six
months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a net change in unrealized depreciation
in the amount of $0.5 million, or a $0.9 million decrease, compared to the $0.4 million in net
change in unrealized appreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The net change in
unrealized depreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2008, included (i) unrealized depreciation
on three investments in portfolio companies totaling $5.9 million offset by $5.9 million in
unrealized appreciation recognized on ten portfolio investments, (ii) unrealized appreciation on
debt investments totaling $0.7 million as a result of adopting SFAS 157, (iii) the reclassification
of $0.7 million of previously recognized unrealized gains into realized gains on two exited
investments, and (iv) unrealized depreciation of $0.5 million related to the Investment Manager.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized a cumulative income tax benefit of
$2.4 million primarily consisting of non-cash deferred tax benefits related to net unrealized
losses from certain portfolio investments transferred into MSEI, our wholly owned taxable
subsidiary. We do not anticipate incurring this level of deferred tax benefit in future periods.
As a result of these events, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations during
the six months ended June 30, 2008, was $7.7 million, or a 147% increase compared to a net increase
in net assets resulting from operations of $3.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced a net decrease in cash and cash
equivalents in the amount of $1.1 million. During that period, we generated $4.7 million of cash
from our operating activities, primarily from net investment income partially offset by the
semi-annual interest payment on our SBIC debentures. We also generated $0.4 million in net cash
from investing activities, principally including the funding of new investments and several smaller
follow-on investments for a total of $30.2 million, offset by proceeds from the maturity of a $24.1
million investment in idle funds investments, $5.7 million in cash proceeds from repayment of debt
investments and $0.8 million of cash proceeds from the redemption and sale of equity investments.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we used $6.2 million in cash for financing activities,
which principally consisted of the cash dividends to stockholders.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we experienced a net increase in cash and cash
equivalents in the amount of $3.9 million. During that period, we generated $2.7 million of cash
from our operating activities, primarily from net investment income, partially offset by the
semi-annual interest payment on our SBIC debentures. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we
used $3.7 million in cash for investing activities. During this period, net cash used for investing
activities principally included the funding of new investments and several smaller follow-on
investments for a total of $10.2 million of invested capital, partially offset by $5.4 million in
cash proceeds from repayment of debt investments and $1.1 million of cash proceeds from the
redemption and sale of two equity investments. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we generated
$4.9 million in cash from financing activities, which principally consisted of the net proceeds
from $9.9 million in additional SBIC debenture borrowings, partially offset by $4.6 million of cash
distributions to partners and $0.4 million for payment of SBIC debenture fees.
34
Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2008, we had $40.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, and our net assets
totaled $116.7 million.
We intend to generate additional cash from future offerings of securities, future borrowings
and cash flow from operations, including income earned from investments in our portfolio companies
and, to a lesser extent, from the temporary investments of cash in U.S. government securities and
other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Our primary uses of funds
will be investments in portfolio companies, operating expenses and cash distributions to holders of
our common stock. Consistent with estimates in prior periods, we continue to project that we will
be able to fund our investment activities through 2008 without requiring new capital.
On June 4, 2008, we received an exemptive order (the Order) from the SEC to permit
co-investments in portfolio companies among Main Street and certain of its affiliates pursuant to
the terms and conditions of the Order. The conditions of the Order generally provide that Main
Street may co-invest with its affiliates as long as, among other things: the co-investments are
made at the same time; are based upon identical financial terms; and are consistent with relative
allocation percentages approved by the independent members of Main Streets Board of Directors.
Pursuant to the Order, Main Street and its wholly owned subsidiaries will generally co-invest in
new portfolio investments with Main Street Capital II, LP, a Small Business Investment Company fund
managed by Main Street and its management team. The SECs issuance of the Order will likely slow
the pace of growth in Main Streets portfolio, but the benefits of co-investments include more
portfolio diversity and an extension of the time horizon for Main Streets existing and available
liquidity.
Due to restrictions under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act), we are not
generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We
may, however, sell our common stock at a price below the current net asset value of the common
stock if our board of directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of our
stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. At our annual stockholders meeting on June
17, 2008, our stockholders voted to allow us to issue common stock at a price below net asset value
per share for a period of one year. In any such case, however, the price at which our common stock
is to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our board of
directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing
commission or discount).
In order to satisfy the Code requirements applicable to a RIC, we intend to distribute to our
stockholders substantially all our taxable income, but we may also elect to periodically spillover
certain excess undistributed taxable income from one tax year into the next tax year. In addition,
as a business development company, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total
assets to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock we
may issue in the future, of at least 200.0%. This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow.
We anticipate that we will continue to fund our investment activities through existing cash
and cash equivalents and a combination of future debt and additional equity capital. Due to our
status as a licensed SBIC, we have the ability to issue debentures guaranteed by the Small Business
Administration (the SBA) at favorable interest rates. Under the regulations applicable to SBICs,
an SBIC can have outstanding debentures guaranteed by the SBA generally in an amount up to twice
its regulatory capital, which generally equates to the amount of its equity capital. The maximum
statutory limit on the dollar amount of outstanding debentures guaranteed by the SBA issued by a
single SBIC or group of SBICs under common control as of June 30, 2008, was $130.6 million (which
amount is subject to increase on an annual basis based on cost-of-living index increases).
Because
of our investment teams affiliations with Main Street Capital
II, LP (MSC II) a separate SBIC
which commenced investment operations in January 2006, we and
MSC II may be deemed
to be a group of SBICs under common control. Thus, the dollar amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures
that can be issued collectively by us and by MSC II may be limited to $130.6
million, absent relief from the SBA. Currently, we do not intend to borrow SBA-guaranteed
indebtedness in excess of $55.0 million based on our existing equity capital.
Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have fixed interest rates that approximate prevailing 10-year
Treasury Note rates plus a spread and have a maturity of ten years with interest payable
semi-annually. The principal amount of the debentures is not required to be paid before maturity
but may be pre-paid at any time. Debentures issued prior to September 2006 were subject to
pre-payment penalties during their first five years. Those pre-payment penalties no longer apply to
debentures issued after September 1, 2006. On June 30, 2008, we had $55 million of outstanding
indebtedness guaranteed by the SBA, which carried an average fixed interest rate of approximately
5.8%. The first maturity related to the SBIC debentures does not
occur until 2013, and the weighted average maturity is 6.9 years
from June 30, 2008.
On December 31, 2007, we entered into a Treasury Secured Revolving Credit Agreement (the
Credit Agreement) among us, Wachovia Bank, National Association, and Branch Banking and Trust
Company (BB&T), as administrative agent for the lenders. Under the Credit Agreement, the lenders
have agreed to extend revolving loans to us in an amount not to exceed $100 million. The purpose of
the Credit Agreement is to provide us flexibility in the sizing of portfolio investments and to
facilitate the growth of our investment portfolio. The Credit Agreement has a two-year term and
bears interest, at our option, either (i) at the LIBOR rate or (ii) at a published prime rate of
interest, plus 25 basis points in either case. The applicable interest rates under the Credit
Agreement would be increased by 15 basis points if usage under the Credit Agreement is in excess of
50% of the days within a given calendar quarter. The Credit Agreement also requires payment of 15
basis points per annum in unused commitment fees based on the average daily unused balances under
the facility. The Credit Agreement is secured by certain securities accounts maintained by BB&T and
is also guaranteed by the Investment Manager. As of June 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, we had no
outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
At
June 30, 2008, Main Street has a debt to equity ratio of 0.47 to 1.0 and a cash to debt ratio of 0.74 to 1.0.
Current Market Conditions
The debt and equity capital markets in the United States have been severely impacted by
significant write-offs in the financial services sector relating to the re-pricing of credit risk
and deterioration in various credit markets and products, among other things. These events, along
with the deterioration of the housing market, have led to worsening general economic conditions
which have impacted the broader financial and credit markets and have reduced the availability of
debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial firms in particular. Although we
have been able to access the capital markets in the past to finance our investment activities, due
to the current turmoil in the debt markets and uncertainty in the equity capital markets, we can
provide no assurance that debt or equity capital will be available to us on favorable terms, or at
all.
In the event that the United States economy enters into a protracted period of weakness, it is
possible that the results of some of the lower middle-market companies, similar to those in which
we invest, could experience deterioration, which could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting
debt service requirements and an increase in defaults. In addition, the end markets for certain of
our portfolio companys products and services have experienced, and may continue to experience,
negative economic trends. While we are not seeing signs of an overall, broad deterioration in our
portfolio company results at this time, we can provide no assurance that the performance of certain
of our portfolio companies will not be negatively impacted by economic or other conditions which
could have a negative impact on our future results.
35
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities. This FASB Staff Position (FSP) addresses whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be
included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS). This FSP shall be
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted
retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected
financial data) to conform to the provisions of this FSP. Early application is not permitted. We
are currently analyzing the effect, if any, this statement may have on our consolidated results of
operations.
Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant effect on our results of operations in any of the
reporting periods presented in this report. However, our portfolio companies have and may continue
to experience the impacts of inflation on their operating results, including escalations in their
costs for raw materials and required energy consumption.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We may be a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. These instruments include
commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of
the amount recognized in the balance sheet. However, as of June 30, 2008, we had no unused binding
commitments to extend credit to our portfolio companies, which are not reflected on our balance
sheet.
Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2008, our future fixed commitments for cash payments on contractual obligations
for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 and |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
thereafter |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
SBIC debentures payable |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
Interest due on SBIC debentures |
|
|
23,099 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
8,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
78,099 |
|
|
$ |
1,603 |
|
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,188 |
|
|
$ |
63,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCC is obligated to make payments under a support services agreement with the Investment
Manager. Subsequent to the Formation Transactions and the Offering, the Investment Manager is
reimbursed for its excess expenses associated with providing investment management and other
services to MSCC and its subsidiaries, as well as MSC II. Each
quarter, as part of the support services agreement, MSCC makes payments to cover all expenses
incurred by the Investment Manager, less the recurring management fees that the Investment Manager
receives from MSC II pursuant to a long-term investment advisory services agreement.
Related Party Transactions
We co-invested with MSC II in several existing portfolio investments prior to the Offering,
but did not co-invest with MSC II subsequent to the Offering and prior to June 2008. In June 2008,
we received exemptive relief from the SEC to allow us to resume co-investing with MSC II. MSC II is
managed by the Investment Manager, and the Investment Manager is wholly owned by MSCC. MSC II is an
SBIC fund with similar investment objectives to Main Street and which began its investment
operations in January 2006.
The co-investments among Main Street and MSC II had all been made at the same time and on the
same terms and conditions. The co-investments were also made in accordance with the Investment
Managers conflicts policy and in accordance with the applicable SBIC conflict of interest
regulations.
36
As discussed further in note D to our consolidated financials statements, Wholly Owned
Investment Manager, Main Street paid certain management fees to the Investment Manager during the
year ended December 31, 2007. Subsequent to the Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager is a
wholly owned, portfolio company of Main Street. At June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the
Investment Manager had a payable of $58,095 and $207,783 due to MSCC, respectively, related to the
funding of recurring administrative expenses required to support MSCCs business.
Recent Developments
On July 1, 2008, Main Streets Board of Directors approved the issuance of 245,645 shares of
restricted stock to Main Street employees pursuant to the Main Street Capital Corporation 2008
Equity Incentive Plan. These shares will vest over a four-year period from the grant date and will
be expensed over a four-year service period starting on the grant date.
On July 1, 2008, a total of 20,000 shares of restricted stock was issued to Main Street
independent directors pursuant to the Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director
Restricted Stock Plan. One-half of those shares vested immediately on the grant date, and the
remaining half will vest on the day immediately preceding the next annual meeting at which Main
Street stockholders elect directors, provided that these independent directors have been in
continuous service as members of the Board through such date. As a result, 50% of those shares were
expensed during July 2008 with the remaining 50% to be expensed over a one-year service period
starting on the grant date.
On July 11, 2008, Main Street sold substantially all the assets of portfolio company TA
Acquisition Group, LP (Travis Aggregates) to a subsidiary of Texas Industries, Inc. (NYSE:
TXI). Main Street realized a $6.4 million gain, including structuring and advisory fees, related
to the sale. The net sale proceeds received by Main Street related to its equity interests in
Travis Aggregates were approximately 19 times Main Streets original equity investment of $0.4
million. Main Street recognized a total compounded annual rate of return over the term of its
investment in Travis Aggregates of approximately 56%, including interest, dividends, fees and
the gain realized on the sale of assets.
On July 31, 2008, Main Street declared a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. The quarterly dividend
will be payable on September 12, 2008, to stockholders of record on August 14, 2008. The ex-dividend
date for this quarterly dividend will be August 12, 2008.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Main Street will begin paying dividends to its shareholders
on a monthly basis instead of paying such dividends on a quarterly basis. Main Street anticipates
declaring per share monthly dividends during the fourth quarter of 2008 in the range of $0.12 to $0.125 per
month, or in the range of $0.36 to $0.375 per share for the entire fourth quarter of 2008. The anticipated
dividend range for the fourth quarter of 2008 represents a 9% to 14% increase from the per share dividend
paid in the fourth quarter of 2007. The projected dividend ranges for the fourth quarter of 2008
coupled with the dividends declared or paid to date during 2008 equate to a range of $1.41 to
$1.425 per share for the total 2008 calendar year dividends. These projected dividend ranges are based upon
Main Streets current estimate of total 2008 taxable income and anticipated portfolio activity.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. Changes in
interest rates may affect both our cost of funding and our interest income from portfolio
investments, cash and cash equivalents and idle funds investments. Our risk management systems and
procedures are designed to identify and analyze our risk, to set appropriate policies and limits
and to continually monitor these risks and limits by means of reliable administrative and
information systems and other policies and programs. Our investment income will be affected by
changes in various interest rates, including LIBOR and prime rates, to the extent of any of our
debt investments that include floating interest rates. A high
percentage of our debt investments are made with fixed interest rates for the term of the investment. However, as of
June 30, 2008, approximately 14.5% of our debt investment portfolio (at cost) bore interest at floating
rates. All of our current outstanding indebtedness is subject to fixed interest rates for the
10-year life of such debt. As of June 30, 2008, we had not entered into any interest rate hedging
arrangements. At June 30, 2008, based on our applicable levels of floating-rate debt investments, a
1% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our level of interest income from
debt investments.
37
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, our President and Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Compliance Officer and our
Chief Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based
on that evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, our President and Chief Financial
Officer, our Chief Compliance Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer, have concluded that our
current disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them of material
information relating to us that is required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 that have materially
affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of our operations in
the normal course of business or otherwise, we are currently not a party to any pending material
legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There were no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, that we filed with the SEC on March 21,
2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, in connection with Main Streets dividend
reinvestment plan for our common stockholders, we directed the plan administrator to purchase
80,716 shares of our common stock for $1,114,182 in the open market in order to satisfy our
obligations to deliver shares of common stock to our stockholders with respect to our dividend for
the second quarter of 2008. The following chart summarizes repurchases of our common stock for the
three months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
of Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Paid Per |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2008 through May 31, 2008 |
|
|
80,098 |
|
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008 |
|
|
618 |
|
|
$ |
13.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on June 17, 2008, for the purpose of:
|
|
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of directors for a term of one year; |
|
|
|
|
Proposal No. 2 Approval of the Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan; |
|
|
|
|
Proposal No. 3 Approval of the Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee
Director Restricted Stock Plan; |
|
|
|
|
Proposal No. 4 Approval of a proposal to authorize us, with the approval of our Board
of Directors, to sell shares of our common stock during the next twelve months at a price
below its then current net asset value per share; |
|
|
|
|
Proposal No. 5 Approval of a proposal to authorize us, with the approval of our Board
of Directors, to issue warrants, options or rights to subscribe for, convert to, or
purchase our common stock in one or more offerings; and |
|
|
|
|
Proposal No. 6 Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2008. |
38
There were no broker non-votes for proposal nos. 1 and 6. All six matters were approved.
All nominees for directors for a one-year term as listed in our 2008 proxy statement were
elected by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
Michael Appling Jr. |
|
|
8,562,136 |
|
|
|
22,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
Joseph E. Canon |
|
|
8,560,692 |
|
|
|
23,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
Arthur L. French |
|
|
8,533,693 |
|
|
|
50,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
William D. Gutermuth |
|
|
8,559,692 |
|
|
|
24,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
8,316,800 |
|
|
|
267,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
8,562,536 |
|
|
|
21,863 |
|
The proposal to approve the Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan was
approved by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
5,650,379
|
|
358,209
|
|
38,755 |
The proposal to approve the Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director
Restricted Stock Plan was approved by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
5,897,230
|
|
120,080
|
|
30,032 |
The proposal to authorize us, with the approval of our Board of Directors, to sell shares of
our common stock during the next twelve months at a price below its then current net asset value
per share was approved by the following vote:
Including Votes by Our Affiliated Persons
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain * |
|
Broker Non-Vote * |
5,839,488
|
|
181,211
|
|
26,645
|
|
2,537,055 |
Excluding Votes by Our Affiliated Persons
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain * |
|
Broker Non-Vote * |
3,586,290
|
|
181,211
|
|
26,645
|
|
2,537,055 |
The proposal to authorize us, with the approval of our Board of Directors, to issue warrants,
options or rights to subscribe for, convert to, or purchase our common stock in one or more
offerings was approved by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
5,880,209
|
|
138,271
|
|
28,861 |
The recommendation to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2008 was approved by the
following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
8,563,447
|
|
9,764
|
|
11,188 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Abstain and Broker non-votes have the
effect of voting against the proposal. |
39
Item 6. Exhibits.
Listed below are the exhibits which are filed as part of this report (according to the number
assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
* |
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Main Street Capital Corporation (previously filed as exhibit (a) to
Main Street Capital Corporations Registration Statement on Form N-2 (Reg. 333-142879)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
* |
|
Main Street Capital Corporation Amended and Restated Bylaws effective May 1, 2008 (previously filed as
exhibit 99.1 to Main Street Capital Corporations current report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Main
Street Capital Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-151799)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.5 to Main Street Capital Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg.
No. 333-151799)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Main Street Capital Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg.
No. 333-151799)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted
Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Main Street Capital Corporations Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-151799)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350). |
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibit previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as indicated, and incorporated herein by reference. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Street Capital Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 12, 2008
|
|
/s/ Vincent D. Foster
Vincent D. Foster
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 12, 2008
|
|
/s/ Todd A. Reppert
Todd A. Reppert
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 12, 2008
|
|
/s/ Michael S. Galvan
Michael S. Galvan
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 12, 2008
|
|
/s/ Rodger A. Stout
Rodger A. Stout
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President-Finance & Administration, |
|
|
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
41
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
* |
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Main Street Capital Corporation (previously filed as exhibit (a) to
Main Street Capital Corporations Registration Statement on Form N-2 (Reg. 333-142879)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
* |
|
Main Street Capital Corporation Amended and Restated Bylaws effective May 1, 2008 (previously filed as
exhibit 99.1 to Main Street Capital Corporations current report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Main
Street Capital Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-151799)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.5 to Main Street Capital Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg.
No. 333-151799)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Main Street Capital Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg.
No. 333-151799)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement Main Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted
Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Main Street Capital Corporations Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-151799)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350). |
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibit previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as indicated, and incorporated herein by reference. |
42