Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Pages 69–71
3.Comment: The Staff notes that the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (the
“2020 10-K”), included a confirmation of securities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, “by
correspondence with custodians, portfolio companies or agents, or by other appropriate auditing
procedures where replies were not received.” Such an opinion is required by Section 30(g) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), for investment companies
registered under the 1940 Act and, as discussed in Dear CFO Letter 2019-01, the Staff believes
that it is best practice for a business development company (“BDC”) to have its auditor verify all
of the securities owned by the BDC, either by actual examination or by receipt of a certificate
from the custodian, and affirmatively state in the audit opinion whether the auditor has confirmed
the existence of all such securities. Please explain in correspondence (1) why the Reports of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in the Company’s Annual Reports on
Form 10-K filed after the 2020 10-K do not include the confirmation of securities opinion
discussed above and (2) confirm whether such confirmation has been completed by the
Company’s auditors for such years.
Response: The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has confirmed that (i)
the confirmation of securities owned verification language referenced in the Staff’s comment was
inadvertently omitted from the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the
Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K filed after the 2020 10-K, (ii) its audits of the
Company’s December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 financial statements included confirmation of
securities owned by the Company and (iii) it will ensure that its future Reports of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm specifically state that this confirmation was performed.
Statement of Operations Disclosures, Page 73
4.Comment: The Staff notes that as part of the Staff’s review of the Company’s filings made under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, conducted in July 2013, the Staff issued a
comment regarding how excise taxes were presented on the Company’s Consolidated Statement
of Operations. At that time, the Company determined that the amount of excise tax was not
material and, thus, believed that putting all income taxes below the net investment income line
item was appropriate. Please confirm in correspondence (1) whether the Company still considers
the amount of excise tax immaterial and properly included below the net investment income line
item and (2) that if excise taxes applicable to items above net investment income is determined to
be material, the Company will include applicable taxes above the net investment income line
item. See Rule 6-07(5) and (7)(d) of Regulation S-X.
Response: Confirmed that the Company has determined that the amount of excise tax applicable
to items above net investment income is not material and, thus, still believes that putting all
income taxes below the net investment income line item is appropriate. Also confirmed that at
any time that the amount of excise tax applicable to items above net investment income is
determined to be material, the Company will undertake to include applicable taxes above the net
investment income line item.